Orientations of the hydroxyl and isopropyl groups in the cis and trans conformers of 2-isopropylphenol and 2-isopropyl-6-methylphenol

1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
pp. 1656-1659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Brenda M. Addison ◽  
Rudy Sebastian ◽  
Timothy A. Wildman
Keyword(s):  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Hydroxyl Groups ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Isopropyl Group ◽  
Phenol Derivatives ◽  
Hydroxyl Protons ◽  
Cis And Trans ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

Measurement of the long-range spin–spin coupling constants between methine or hydroxyl protons and the ring protons in 2-isopropylphenol shows that the trans conformer is favored by 2.5 ± 0.3 kJ/mol for a 2 mol% solution in CCl4, at 305 K. In this conformer the methine C—H bond of the isopropyl group points towards the hydroxyl group. In the cis conformer, the C—H bond points away from the hydroxyl group. In 2-isopropyl-6-methylphenol the conformation in which the O—H bond lies trans to the isopropyl group is preferred by 1.2 ± 0.3 kJ/mol in free energy at 305 K in CCl4 solution. This result agrees with an additive superposition of the conformational preferences of the hydroxyl groups in the monosubstituted phenol derivatives. Molecular orbital calculations do not agree with the existence of a cis conformer.

In-plane and out-of-plane conformational preferences of the sulfhydryl group in some halothiophenol derivatives

1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1421-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
William J. E. Parr
Keyword(s):  
Sulfhydryl Group ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Recent Analysis ◽  
Phenol Derivatives ◽  
Out Of Plane ◽  
Intramolecular Hydrogen ◽  
Cis And Trans ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

Long-range spin–spin coupling constants between sulfhydryl protons and ring protons in some halothiophenol derivatives in CCl4 solutions are reported. In contrast to the corresponding phenol derivatives, substantial amounts of out-of-plane conformers are present at 305 K for all but 2,6-dichlorothiophenol. The cis and trans conformers differ by only about 0.2 kcal/mol in free energy for 2,4-dibromothiophenol and 2,4-dichlorothiophenol, in good agreement with a recent analysis of the dipole moment observed for the latter compound. The barrier to internal rotation of the sulfhydryl group is considerably smaller than for a hydroxyl group and rough estimates are given for the barrier in a few compounds. For example, the barrier in 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol is lower than in 2,6-dichlorothiophenol. STO-3G MO calculations overestimate the internal barrier to rotation of the sulfhydryl group, but yield charge densities for this group which indicate that a major cause of the relative weakness of its intramolecular hydrogen bonds resides in its lack of polarity.

A proton magnetic resonance estimate of the extent of intramolucular hydrogen bonding in derivatives of 2-trifluoromethyl phenol. Solvent effects

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 2243-2248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
J. Brian Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Vapor Phase ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Hydroxyl Protons ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between hydroxyl protons and ring protons or fluorine nuclei are used to establish the conformer populations in iodine and brornine derivatives of 2-trifluoromethylphenol in C6H12, CCl4, and C6D6 solutions. The sequence Cl, [Formula: see text] is established for the so-called hydrogen bonding preferences of the hydroxyl group in 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenols, the corresponding free energy sequence being −ΔG = 1690, 1690 > 1300 > 1230 > 0 ± 200 cal/mol at 32 °C in CCl4 solution. An indirect estimate of the free energy differences in the vapor phase suggests the sequence −ΔG = 2800, 2800 > 2400 > 2300 > 1100 ± 300 cal/mol; the latter value meaning that the hydroxyl group in 4-bromo-2-trifluoromethylphenol prefers the CF3 group by this amount in the vapor phase. Benzene interacts preferentially with the OH group in this compound to the extent of 1300 cal/mol (ΔG), referenced to the vapor phase.

On the existence of cis and trans conformational isomers in 2-methylphenol and 4-chloro-2-methylphenol

1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (13) ◽  
pp. 1788-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Kalvin Chum
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Energy Difference ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Trans Form ◽  
Hydroxyl Proton ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Cis And Trans ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The analysis of the proton magnetic resonance spectra of 2-methylphenol and of 4-chloro-2-methylphenol in benzene-d6 and CCl4 solutions yields spin–spin coupling constants over five bonds between the hydroxyl proton and the meta ring protons. These coupling constants are related to the intramolecular equilibrium between conformers in which the hydroxyl group is oriented cis or trans to the methyl group. The free energy difference between the conformers is 0.4 ± 0.1 kcal/mol, with the trans form being the more stable. The concentration dependence of the hydroxyl proton chemical shift of the chloro compound in CCl4 suggests that dimerization is relatively unimportant and yields rough values for the extent of self-association. It is argued that the derived free energy values refer to the intramolecular equilibrium for the monomers.

Information from stereospecific spin–spin couplings about the relative absorptivities of the hydroxyl stretching bands in 2-iodophenol solutions

1981 ◽  
Vol 59 (21) ◽  
pp. 3021-3025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Rudy Sebastian ◽  
Timothy A. Wildman
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Temperature Dependent ◽  
Hydroxyl Proton ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Cis And Trans ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The stereospecific spin–spin coupling constants between the hydroxyl proton and the ring protons for 2-iodophenol in various solvents yield some free energy differences between the cis and trans conformations of this molecule at 305 K. Comparison with areas of the hydroxyl stretching bands in the same or similar solvents shows that the ratio of the absorptivity coefficients for the two conformers is sensitive to solvent. It is suggested that this ratio is temperature dependent and therefore apparent enthalpy differences must be considered tentative for at least some solutions. Molecular orbital calculations are consistent with the arguments concerning the absorptivity coefficients.

Proton spin–spin coupling constants and intramolecular hydrogen bonding in bromine derivatives of 1,3-dihydroxybenzene

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 2228-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
J. Brian Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Proton Spin ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Groups ◽  
Oh Groups ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The conformational preferences in CCl4 solution at 32 °C of the hydroxyl groups in bromine derivatives of 1,3-dihydroxybenzene are deduced from the long-range spin–spin coupling constants between hydroxyl protons and ring protons over five bonds. Two hydroxyl groups hydrogen bond to the same bromine substituent in 2-bromo-1,3-dihydroxybenzene but prefer to hydrogen bond to different bromine substituents when available, as in 2,4-dibromo-1,3-dihydroxybenzene. When the OH groups can each choose between two ortho bromine atoms, as in 2,4,6-tribromoresorcinol, they apparently do so in a very nearly statistical manner except that they avoid hydrogen bonding to the common bromine atom.

A proton magnetic resonance determination of the small rotational barriers about the C—Si bond in phenyl derivatives of chloro and methyl silanes

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Ted Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Proton Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of ◽  
Low Energy Conformations

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between protons bonded to silicon and ring protons in C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, C6H5SiH2CH3, C6H5SiHCl2, and C6H5SiH(CH3)2 are determined from the proton magnetic resonance spectra of benzene solutions. A hindered rotor treatment of the barrier to internal rotation about the C—Si bond, in conjunction with the coupling constants over six bonds, allows the deduction of the low-energy conformations for C6H5SiH(CH3)2 and for C6H5SiHCl2, as well as of barriers of 1.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol. The approach becomes less reliable for C6H5SiH2CH3 and for C6H5SiH2Cl and, particularly for the latter compound, the derived barrier is very likely an upper limit only. Ab initio molecular orbital calculations of the conformational energies are reported for C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, and for C6H5SiHCl2.

INDO Molecular Orbital Calculations of Nuclear Spin–Spin Coupling Constants Over Three Bonds Between 13C and 1H in Some Simple Molecules

1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wasylishen ◽  
T. Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Dihedral Angle ◽  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Methyl Proton ◽  
Coupling Path ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Simple Molecules ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

Molecular orbital calculations, at the INDO level, of the spin–spin coupling constants over three bonds between carbon-13 and protons are reported for a number of simple molecules. In propane the coupling depends on dihedral angle in the Karplus manner. Fluorine substituents cause changes in the computed coupling which are best described as alternating with the number of bonds intervening between the substituent and the coupled nuclei. Finer details of this phenomenon are discussed and calculations on propyllithium are performed. Replacement of a central carbon atom in propane by a heteroatom does not radically alter the computed couplings. The presence of a carbonyl group in the coupling path results in an overestimate of the magnitude of the coupling. In propene the coupling between 13C in position 1 and a methyl proton displays a maximum when the C—H bond of the methyl group lies parallel to the π orbitals. In toluene the coupling to a methyl proton is insensitive to the dihedral angle over half its range, a result of importance to structural studies. Among other molecules under consideration are methylacetylene, propionaldehyde, and the strained bicyclobutane. It is suggested that in certain instances the mean of the predictions from the INDO and CNDO/2 procedures may agree better with experiment than will the prediction from either procedure alone. Calculations on fluorobenzene and 1,2-difluorobenzene suggest that the main experimental trends of the couplings between carbon and protons within the benzene ring are reproduced. Such is perhaps not true for the five-membered heterocycles.

199Hg-1H Spin-spin coupling in vinyl and ethynyl mercurials

1964 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
PR Wells ◽  
W Kitching
Keyword(s):  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Cis And Trans ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The proton magnetic spectra of cis and trans-2-chlorovinylmercuric chloride, bis(trans-2-chlorovinyl)mercury, and methylethynylmercury have been determined. Large variations in the 199Hg-1H spin-spin coupling constants are observed for different hybridization states and different geometries.

Mechanisms of 1H,1H; 1H,13C; and 13C,13C spin–spin coupling constants in benzyl cyanide and some derivatives. Experimental and theoretical estimates of internal rotational potentials

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 2013-2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Glenn H. Penner
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Cyano Group ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Similar Data ◽  
Orbital Theory ◽  
Benzyl Cyanide ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The mechanisms of long-range spin–spin coupling constants involving the methylene protons and the 13C nucleus of the cyano group are discussed for benzyl cyanide. Analysis of the 1H nmr spectrum of benzyl cyanide-8-13C in benzene-d6 solution yields nJ(H,CH2) and nJ(H,13CN) for n = 4–6. Similar data are reported for the 2,6-dichloro and 2,6-difluoro derivatives, together with some sign determinations. nJ(13C,13CN), n = 1–5, are given for the three compounds. It is shown that all these parameters are consistent with a small barrier to internal rotation about the [Formula: see text] bond in benzyl cyanide in solution. Computations at various levels of molecular orbital theory agree that this barrier is small. The nJ(13C, 13CN) imply a stabilization in polar solvents of the conformation in which the cyano group of benzyl cyanide lies in a plane perpendicular to the benzene plane. The molecular orbital calculations indicate a predominantly twofold nature of the internal barrier, although a significant fourfold component is also present. The coupling constants cannot discern the presence of the fourfold component for benzyl cyanide nor for its 2,6-difluoro derivative. 1J(13C,13CN) is solvent dependent. A table of the computed sidechain geometries is appended.

scholarly journals Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectrum of 1-Penten-3-yne. INDO and CNDO/2 Molecular Orbital Calculations on Long-Range Spin–Spin Coupling Constants in Enynes

1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 1863-1867 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ernst ◽  
H. M. Hutton ◽  
T. Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Orbital ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Benzene Solution ◽  
Parent Compound ◽  
Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectrum ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling

The high resolution p.m.r. spectra of 1-penten-3-yne in carbon disulfide and in benzene solution are analyzed. Long-range spin–spin coupling constants are discussed in terms of σ and π electron contributions. Comparisons are made with the isomeric 2-methyl-1-buten-3-yne and the parent compound, vinylacetylene. The results of INDO and CNDO/2 molecular orbital calculations are compared to the experimental coupling constants. It is concluded that the π electron contribution to 5J in enyne systems is +0.6 to 0.7 Hz and that σ electron contributions are rather small, the transoid ("pseudo-zig–zag") being larger than the cisoid one. Observed allylic coupling constants in the propene derivative are compared with the calculated values, including those for propene and 2-cyanopropene, available in the literature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document