A proton magnetic resonance estimate of the extent of intramolucular hydrogen bonding in derivatives of 2-trifluoromethyl phenol. Solvent effects

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 2243-2248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
J. Brian Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Vapor Phase ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Group ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Hydroxyl Protons ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between hydroxyl protons and ring protons or fluorine nuclei are used to establish the conformer populations in iodine and brornine derivatives of 2-trifluoromethylphenol in C6H12, CCl4, and C6D6 solutions. The sequence Cl, [Formula: see text] is established for the so-called hydrogen bonding preferences of the hydroxyl group in 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenols, the corresponding free energy sequence being −ΔG = 1690, 1690 > 1300 > 1230 > 0 ± 200 cal/mol at 32 °C in CCl4 solution. An indirect estimate of the free energy differences in the vapor phase suggests the sequence −ΔG = 2800, 2800 > 2400 > 2300 > 1100 ± 300 cal/mol; the latter value meaning that the hydroxyl group in 4-bromo-2-trifluoromethylphenol prefers the CF3 group by this amount in the vapor phase. Benzene interacts preferentially with the OH group in this compound to the extent of 1300 cal/mol (ΔG), referenced to the vapor phase.

Proton spin–spin coupling constants and intramolecular hydrogen bonding in bromine derivatives of 1,3-dihydroxybenzene

1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (14) ◽  
pp. 2228-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
J. Brian Rowbotham
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Bond ◽  
Hydrogen Bonding ◽  
Proton Spin ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Hydroxyl Groups ◽  
Oh Groups ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The conformational preferences in CCl4 solution at 32 °C of the hydroxyl groups in bromine derivatives of 1,3-dihydroxybenzene are deduced from the long-range spin–spin coupling constants between hydroxyl protons and ring protons over five bonds. Two hydroxyl groups hydrogen bond to the same bromine substituent in 2-bromo-1,3-dihydroxybenzene but prefer to hydrogen bond to different bromine substituents when available, as in 2,4-dibromo-1,3-dihydroxybenzene. When the OH groups can each choose between two ortho bromine atoms, as in 2,4,6-tribromoresorcinol, they apparently do so in a very nearly statistical manner except that they avoid hydrogen bonding to the common bromine atom.

A proton magnetic resonance determination of the small rotational barriers about the C—Si bond in phenyl derivatives of chloro and methyl silanes

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. E. Parr ◽  
Ted Schaefer
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Proton Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Molecular Orbital Calculations ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of ◽  
Low Energy Conformations

The long-range spin–spin coupling constants between protons bonded to silicon and ring protons in C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, C6H5SiH2CH3, C6H5SiHCl2, and C6H5SiH(CH3)2 are determined from the proton magnetic resonance spectra of benzene solutions. A hindered rotor treatment of the barrier to internal rotation about the C—Si bond, in conjunction with the coupling constants over six bonds, allows the deduction of the low-energy conformations for C6H5SiH(CH3)2 and for C6H5SiHCl2, as well as of barriers of 1.0 ± 0.2 kcal/mol. The approach becomes less reliable for C6H5SiH2CH3 and for C6H5SiH2Cl and, particularly for the latter compound, the derived barrier is very likely an upper limit only. Ab initio molecular orbital calculations of the conformational energies are reported for C6H5SiH3, C6H5SiH2Cl, and for C6H5SiHCl2.

scholarly journals The conformational behaviour of 5Jm(F,CH) in 3,5-difluoro derivatives of toluene, ethylbenzene, and cumene. Applications

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1490-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Craig S. Takeuchi ◽  
Steven Eric Sveinson
Keyword(s):  
Large Degree ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Derivatives Of

The CNDO/2 and INDO MO FPT values for 5Jm(F,CH3) in 3-fluoro- and 3,5-difluorotoluene are exactly reproduced by A cos2 θ + B sin2 θ + C sin2 (θ/2). Here θ is the angle by which the α C—H bond twists out of the benzene plane. Adjustment of A,B, and C to give an agreement with experiment for 3,5-difluorotoluene yields an equation, best considered empirical, which is tested by 5J(F,CH) in 3,5-difluoroethylbenzene and 3,5-difluoroisopropylbenzene. The equation reproduces 5J(F,CH) in these two compounds, the values of [Formula: see text] being derived from 6Jp(H,CH), the spin–spin coupling constants over six bonds between the α and para ring protons. 5J(F,CH) is obtained for the asymmetrical compounds, 2,3-difluorobenzylidene diacetate and 2-bromo-5-fluorobenzylidene diacetate. It is shown how 5J(F,CH) in the latter can discriminate between two conformers, each of which, on the basis of 6J(H,CH), will be characterized by a large degree of torsion about the [Formula: see text] bond.

Theoretical and experimental conformational preferences of the aldehyde and fluoroaldehyde groups in 2-methylbenzaldehyde, 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde, and 4-chloro-2-methylbenzoyl fluoride. Proximate couplings

1980 ◽  
Vol 58 (22) ◽  
pp. 2364-2368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ted Schaefer ◽  
Salman R. Salman ◽  
Timothy A. Wildman
Keyword(s):  
Free Energy ◽  
Benzene Solution ◽  
Energy Difference ◽  
Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Coupling ◽  
Mo Calculations ◽  
Conformational Preferences ◽  
Spin Coupling Constants ◽  
Spin Spin Coupling ◽  
Anti Form

On the basis of long-range spin–spin coupling constants, the O-syn conformation of 2-methylbenzaldehyde in CCl4 solution at 305 K is favored over the O-anti form by a free energy of 0.53 kJ/mol. This number is compatible with other experiments, as well as with STO-3G MO calculations in which the geometry of the substituents is optimized. The latter yield 0.52 kJ/mol in the internal energy difference. In benzene solution, 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde exists in the O-anti form to the extent of at least 95% at 305 K. In CCl4 solution at this temperature, the population of the O-syn conformer of 4-chloro-2-methylbenzoyl fluoride is likely 75% or more of the total, in semiquantitative agreement with STO-3G optimization procedures. Substantial proximate couplings exist between 1H and 19F nuclei in the sidechains of the latter two compounds and are compared with INDO MO FPT computations. These yield negative values for [Formula: see text] in 2-trifluoromethylbenzaldehyde, whereas the experimental value is 2.23 Hz.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document