THE COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES: VII. ARGON IN THE TEMPERATURE RANGE 0–600 °C. AND THE PRESSURE RANGE 10–80 ATMOSPHERES

1953 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 722-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Whalley ◽  
Y. Lupien ◽  
W. G. Schneider

The virial coefficients of argon have been measured in the temperature and pressure range described. "Best" values of the virial coefficients have been computed from all measurements reported in the literature.

1955 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Whalley ◽  
Y. Lupien ◽  
W. G. Schneider

The virial coefficients of xenon have been measured in the temperature and pressure range described. The results are compared with previous measurements.


Precision measurements of the refractive index of ethylene and neo pentane over a pressure range 0 to 1 atm and a temperature range of 25 to 70 °C were made and used to calculate virial coefficients. Some measurements on air and n -hexane are also reported. Certain aspects of the use of the Rayleigh refractometer are discussed.


1969 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Bruges ◽  
M. R. Gibson

Equations specifying the dynamic viscosity of compressed water and steam are presented. In the temperature range 0-100cC the location of the inversion locus (mu) is defined for the first time with some precision. The low pressure steam results are re-correlated and a higher inversion temperature is indicated than that previously accepted. From 100 to 600°C values of viscosity are derived up to 3·5 kilobar and between 600 and 1500°C up to 1 kilobar. All the original observations in the gaseous phase have been corrected to a consistent set of densities and deviation plots for all the new correlations are given. Although the equations give values within the tolerances of the International Skeleton Table it is clear that the range and tolerances of the latter could with some advantage be revised to give twice the existing temperature range and over 10 times the existing pressure range at low temperatures. A list of the observations used and their deviations from the correlating equations is available as a separate publication.


2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-38
Author(s):  
L. B. Damdinova ◽  
B. B. Damdinov ◽  
M. O. Rampilov ◽  
S. V. Kanakin

This study examines the compositions of the ore and the ore formation solutions, conditions of formation, and sources of Be mineralization using the Aunikskoye F-Be deposit, which is an integral part of the Western Transbaikal beryllium-bearing provinces, as a representative example. Further, the main factors responsible for the formation of beryllium mineralization were evaluated. The ore deposits are presented by the feldsparic–fluorspar–phenacite–bertrandite metasomatites formed in the carboniferous limestones during their metasomatic alternation with hydrothermal solutions by introducing F, Be, and other associated elements. The formation of early phenacite–fluorspar association occurred in high-fluorite СО2-containing solutions of elevated alkalinity with a salinity of ~10.5%–12% wt eq. NaCl in a temperature range of ~ 370–260 °С at pressures ranging from 1873 to 1248 bar. More recent fluorite and bertrandite deposits were formed by solutions with a salinity of 6.4%–7.7% wt eq. NaCl in a temperature range of ~156 °C–110 °C and a pressure range of 639–427 bar. The examination of the isotopic signature of the ore association minerals confirmed the apocarbonate nature of the main ore deposit and allowed the determination of the magmatogene nature of the ore-forming paleothermal springs, which are the source of subalkaline leucogranites. The primary factors that influenced the formation of the F-Be ore included the reduction of the F activity in solutions because of the binding of Ca and F in fluorite as well as because of the decrease in temperature during the ore deposition process. The elevated alkalinity of the ore-formation solutions resulted in the low solubility of the Be complexes, which caused a relatively low Be content in the ore and a relatively small amount of mineralization in the deposit.


2011 ◽  
Vol 225 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1271-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Kappler ◽  
Judit Zádor ◽  
Oliver Welz ◽  
Ravi X. Fernandez ◽  
Matthias Olzmann ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 2211-2216 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hahne ◽  
P. Krebs ◽  
U. Schindewolf

The electrical conductivity of metal–ammonia solutions can be described by an equilibrium of solvated electrons of low mobility and of free electrons of high mobility. With proper choice of the equilibrium constant and its temperature and pressure dependence and of the solvation number of the solvated species the experimental conductivities can be matched in the temperature and pressure range from 240 to 420 K and up to 1000 bar over the entire concentration range from 0.1 mol/ℓ to saturation, also fitting the extrema of the temperature and pressure coefficients of the conductivity around 1 mol/ℓ.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document