Pile group elastic load response prediction: friction piles embedded in cohesive soils

1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-592
Author(s):  
R. A. Douglas ◽  
R. Butterfield
Keyword(s):  
Design Procedure ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
Response Prediction ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Cohesive Soils ◽  
Pile Groups ◽  
Elastic Load ◽  
Stiffness Reduction ◽  
Load Response ◽  
Group Response

Predicting the elastic vertical working load response of friction pile groups embedded in cohesive soils is a problem still requiring a solution that can be easily implemented by practising engineers. A design procedure based on an extensive analysis of the results of a computer program is presented as a solution to the problem.The program was used to study the effects of the interaction of closely spaced piles in groups, on the pile group response to loading. It is possible to define an average pile stiffness (load per unit displacement) and discuss a reduction of this stiffness, due to pile interaction, when the pile is placed in a group of similar piles. This interaction is accounted for by a stiffness reduction factor, ρ.The design approach is compared with load tests at model and full scale, with good agreement. Key words: piles, pile groups, working loads, elastic pile displacements.

scholarly journals The Effect of Vertical Loads and the Pile Shape on Pile Group Response under Lateral Two-Way Cyclic Loading

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 2377-2391
Author(s):  
Aseel Kahlan Mahmood ◽  
Jasim M Abbas
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Cyclic Load ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Load Ratio ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
Pile Groups ◽  
Group Response ◽  
Load Intensity ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Aluminum Pipe

This paper is presented the lateral dynamic response of pile groups embedded in dry sand under influence of vertical loads and the pile shape in-group, which are subjected to the lateral two-way cyclic loads. The laboratory typical tests with pile groups (2×1) have an aluminum-pipe (i.e. circular, square) pile, embedded length to diameter of pile ratio (L/D=40) and spacing to diameter ratio (S/D) of 3, 5, 7 and 9 are used with different cyclic-load ratio (CLR) 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8. The experimental results are revealed that both the vertical and lateral pile capacity and displacement is significantly affected by the cyclic-loading factors i.e. (number of cycles, cyclic load ratio, and shape of pile) .In this study, important design references are presented. Which are explained that the response of the pile groups under cyclic lateral loading are clear affected by the attendance of vertical load and pile shape. Where, it is reduction the lateral displacement of group piles head and increase lateral capacity about (50) % compared without vertical loads. On the other side, the pile shape is a well affected to the pile response where the level of decline in lateral displacement at the pile groups head in the square pile is more than circular pile about 20 % at the same load intensity.

Small scale model test on lateral behaviors of pile group in loose silica sand

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-54
Author(s):  
Amir Vakili ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Ali Zomorodian ◽  
Arash Totonchi
Keyword(s):  
Model Test ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
Lateral Load ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Silica Sand ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Pile Groups ◽  
Pile Spacing ◽  
Group Reduction

The accurate predictions of load- deflection response of the pile group are necessary for a safe and economical design. The behavior of piles under the lateral load embedded in soil, is typically analyzed using the Winkler nonlinear springs method. In this method, the soil-pile interaction is modeled by nonlinear p-y curves in a way that the single pile p-y curve is modified using a p-multiplier (Pm) for each row of piles in the group. The average Pm is called the group reduction factor. The Pm factor depends upon the configuration of pile group and the pile spacing (S). The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of various parameters, such as the pile spacing in the group, different layouts and the lateral load angle (Ѳ) change as a new parameter on the Pm factor and group efficiency based on the 1-g model test. The Pm factor is well comparable with the results of the full-scale test on pile group. However, based on the results, the calculated values of the Pm factor for 3×3 pile groups under 2.5-diameter spacing was estimated about 0.38 and under 3.5-diameter spacing was estimated about 0.52, so the calculated values at S/D=3, obtained from interpolation the values of group reduction factor at S/D=2.5 and S/D=3.5, are close to the AASHTO recommendation.

Load tests on full-scale bored pile groups

2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 1293-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoliang Dai ◽  
Rodrigo Salgado ◽  
Weiming Gong ◽  
Yanbei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Load Transfer ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
Interaction Coefficient ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Pile Groups ◽  
Interaction Coefficients ◽  
Bored Pile ◽  
Load Response ◽  
Load Tests ◽  
Single Piles

The interactions between closely spaced piles in a pile group are complex. Very limited experimental data are available on the loading of full-scale bored pile groups. This paper reports the results of axial static load tests of both full-scale instrumented pile groups and single piles. The load tests aimed to ascertain the influence of number, length, and spacing of the piles on pile group load response. Experiments varied in the number of piles in the group, pile spacing, type of pile groups, and pile length. All piles had a diameter of 400 mm. Two-, four-, and nine-pile groups with pile lengths of 20 and 24 m were tested. As the isolated piles and some piles in the pile groups were instrumented, the load transfer and load–settlement curves of both piles in isolation and individual instrumented piles in the groups were obtained. The interaction coefficient for each pile in the group was back-calculated from the measured data. The interaction coefficients are shown to be dependent on pile proximity, as usually assumed in elastic analyses, but also on settlement and on the size of the group.

An Approach to Determine the Stiffness Reduction Factor of Tunnel Lining

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 3659-3662
Author(s):  
Hai Ying Zhou ◽  
Li Xin Li ◽  
Ting Guo Chen
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Analysis ◽  
Flexural Rigidity ◽  
Resistance Coefficient ◽  
Reduction Factor ◽  
Tunnel Lining ◽  
Soil Resistance ◽  
Stiffness Reduction ◽  
Simplified Method

Based on the segmental joint tests, it was found that the practical range of joint flexural rigidity was in range of 8500-29000kN•m/rad. A simplified method for determining the stiffness reduction factor of tunnel lining() was proposed using results from the segmental joint tests in which some parameters were obtained by calibration against a 3D Numerical analysis. The influence of joint flexural rigidity, soil resistance coefficient, thickness of tunnel lining and tunnel calculation radius on the stiffness reduction factor of tunnel lining was examined. The stiffness reduction factor can be simply expressed as a function of joint flexural rigidity ratio, soil resistance coefficient, thickness of tunnel lining and tunnel calculation radius for the typical tunnel lining.

Seismic Response of Pile Groups Improved with Deep Cement mixing Columns in Liquefiable Sand: Shaking Table Tests

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dingwen Zhang ◽  
Anhui Wang ◽  
Xuanming Ding
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Behavior ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Bending Moment ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Excess Pore Pressure ◽  
Shaking Table Tests ◽  
Pile Groups ◽  
Acceleration Response ◽  
Table Model

A series of shaking table model tests were performed to examine the effects of deep cement mixing (DCM) columns with different reinforcement depths on the seismic behavior of a pile group in liquefiable sand. Due to the DCM column reinforcement, the fundamental natural frequency of the model ground increases noticeably. The excess pore pressure of soils reduces with the increase of reinforcement depths of the DCM columns. Before liquefaction, the acceleration response of soils in the improved cases is obviously lower than that in the unimproved case, but the acceleration attenuation is greater after liquefaction in the unimproved case. Moreover, the lateral displacement of the superstructure, the settlement of the raft, and the bending moment of the piles in the improved cases are significantly reduced compared to those in the unimproved case, and the reduction ratios rise with the increase of reinforcement depth of the DCM columns. However, reinforcement by the DCM columns may result in the variation of the location of the maximum moment that occurs in the pile.

scholarly journals Comparison of Induced Deflection and Forces in Piles Adjacent to Tunnelling and Deep Excavation in 2D and 3D Problems

2018 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 04011
Author(s):  
Ong Yin Hoe ◽  
Hisham Mohamad
Keyword(s):  
Bending Moment ◽  
Pile Group ◽  
3D Models ◽  
Deep Excavation ◽  
Pile Groups ◽  
Out Of Plane ◽  
National University ◽  
Plane Direction ◽  
2D And 3D ◽  
2D Model

There is a trend in Malaysia and Singapore, engineers tend to model the effect of TBM tunneling or deep excavation to the adjacent piles in 2D model. In the 2D model, the pile is modelled using embedded row pile element which is a 1-D element. The user is allowed to input the pile spacing in out-of-plane direction. This gives an impression to engineers the embedded pile row element is able to model the pile which virtually is a 3D problem. It is reported by Sluis (2014) that the application of embedded pile row element is limited to 8D of pile length. It is also reported that the 2D model overestimates the axial load in pile and the shear force and bending moment at pile top and it is not realistic in comparison to 3D model. In this paper, the centrifuge results of single pile and 6-pile group - tunneling problem carried out in NUS (National University of Singapore) are back-analysed with Midas GTS 3D and a 2D program. In a separate case study, pile groups adjacent to a deep excavation is modelled by 3D and 2D program. This paper compares the deflection and forces in piles in 2D and 3D models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document