Energy spectrum of cosmic ray primaries at super high energies estimated from the recent balloon-borne calorimeter measurements

1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Bhattacharyya

The energy spectrum of primary cosmic ray particles has been estimated from the analysis of the chemical composition data of high energy cosmic rays, data obtained by the Japanese American cooperative emulsion experiments for proton and helium intensities and the Goddard Space Flight Centre measurements for cosmic ray nuclei. The results indicate no drastic change in abundance ratios at high energies. The elemental fluxes have been calculated by assuming that the primary cosmic ray nuclei break up into their constituent nucleons near the top of the atmosphere. The calculated total primary spectrum in the range 2–300 TeV follows the form N(E) dE = 2.24 × 104 E−2.7 dE where E is the energy expressed in GeV/nucleon and N(E) is the intensity expressed in (m2∙s∙sr∙GeV/nucleon) −1.Using this primary spectrum as the source of nucleons near the top of the atmosphere, the sea level proton and neutron spectra have been estimated by using the Feynman scaling hypothesis and the conventional nucleon-atmospheric diffusion equation. The derived spectra are in accord with the measured proton and neutron spectra of Brooke and Wolfendale, Ashton and Coates, and Ashton et al.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. L. Biermann ◽  
L. I. Caramete ◽  
A. Meli ◽  
B. N. Nath ◽  
E.-S. Seo ◽  
...  

Abstract. A model is introduced, in which the irregularity spectrum of the Galactic magnetic field beyond the dissipation length scale is first a Kolmogorov spectrum k-5/3 at small scales λ = 2 π/k with k the wave-number, then a saturation spectrum k-1, and finally a shock-dominated spectrum k-2 mostly in the halo/wind outside the Cosmic Ray disk. In an isotropic approximation such a model is consistent with the Interstellar Medium (ISM) data. With this model we discuss the Galactic Cosmic Ray (GCR) spectrum, as well as the extragalactic Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECRs), their chemical abundances and anisotropies. UHECRs may include a proton component from many radio galaxies integrated over vast distances, visible already below 3 EeV.


2019 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 01002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tareq AbuZayyad ◽  
Olivier Deligny ◽  
Daisuke Ikeda ◽  
Dmitri Ivanov ◽  
Isabelle Lhenry-Yvon ◽  
...  

The energy spectrum of ultra-high energy cosmic rays is the most emblematic observable for describing these particles. Beyond a few tens of EeV, the Pierre Auger Observatory and the Telescope Array, currently being exploited, provide the largest exposures ever accumulated in the Southern and Northern hemispheres to measure independently a suppression of the intensity, in a complementary way in terms of the coverage of the sky. However, the comparison of the spectra shows differences that are not reducible to an overall uncertainty on the calibration of the energy scale used to reconstruct the extensive air showers. In line with the previous editions of the UHECR workshops, a working group common to both experiments examined these differences by focusing this time on quantification of these differences in the region of the sky commonly observed, where the spectra should be in agreement within uncertainties when directional-exposure effects are taken into account. These differences are compared with the systematic uncertainties of each experiment. We have also revisited the methods of determining cosmic-ray energies and deriving the energy spectrum. We describe the surface detector (SD) spectrum obtained adopting an energy calibration based on the constant intensity cut method (CIC), a Monte Carlo-based attenuation correction, and an energy-dependent CIC attenuation correction.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (24) ◽  
pp. 1991-1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUKIO TOMOZAWA

The author reviews a model for the emission of high energy cosmic rays, gamma-rays and neutrinos from AGN (Active Galactic Nuclei) that he has proposed since 1985. Further discussion of the knee energy phenomenon of the cosmic ray energy spectrum requires the existence of a heavy particle with mass in the knee energy range. A possible method of detecting such a particle in the Pierre Auger Project is suggested. Also presented is a relation between the spectra of neutrinos and gamma-rays emitted from AGN. This relation can be tested by high energy neutrino detectors such as ICECUBE, the Mediterranean Sea Detector and possibly by the Pierre Auger Project.


2019 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 01005 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Biteau ◽  
T. Bister ◽  
L. Caccianiga ◽  
O. Deligny ◽  
A. di Matteo ◽  
...  

Despite deflections by Galactic and extragalactic magnetic fields, the distribution of ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) over the celestial sphere remains a most promising observable for the identification of their sources. Thanks to a large number of detected events over the past years, a large-scale anisotropy at energies above 8 EeV has been identified, and there are also indications from the Telescope Array and Pierre Auger Collaborations of deviations from isotropy at intermediate angular scales (about 20 degrees) at the highest energies. In this contribution, we map the flux of UHECRs over the full sky at energies beyond each of two major features in the UHECR spectrum – the ankle and the flux suppression -, and we derive limits for anisotropy on different angular scales in the two energy regimes. In particular, full-sky coverage enables constraints on low-order multipole moments without assumptions about the strength of higher-order multipoles. Following previous efforts from the two Collaborations, we build full-sky maps accounting for the relative exposure of the arrays and differences in the energy normalizations. The procedure relies on cross-calibrating the UHECR fluxes reconstructed in the declination band around the celestial equator covered by both observatories. We present full-sky maps at energies above ~ 10 EeV and ~ 50 EeV, using the largest datasets shared across UHECR collaborations to date. We report on anisotropy searches exploiting full-sky coverage and discuss possible constraints on the distribution of UHECR sources.


1987 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 554-554
Author(s):  
Shigeki Miyaji

Cosmic ray spectrum has an intensity enhancement at energy range 1014–16 eV/nuc. Recently Takahasi et al. (1986) called an attention to chemical composition there. Although the data still contain large uncertainties, they argued an overabundance of calcium at high energies (Ca/Fe ≥ 2 above 1014 eV/nucleus) and some enhancements of medium heavy nuclei (C ∼ Ar) instead of no anomalous p, He, and Fe abundances.


1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 1050-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratibha Pal ◽  
D. P. Bhattacharyya

The muon range spectra under Mont Blanc Tunnel and Kolar Gold Field rocks have been calculated from the recently measured primary cosmic ray spectrum. The scaling hypothesis of Feynman has been used for the calculation of pion and kaon spectra in the atmosphere. The meson atmospheric diffusion equation has been solved by following the method of Bugaev et al. The derived muon energy spectrum has been found to be in good agreement with the measured data of the Kiel, Durham, DEIS, and Moscow University groups. The calculated muon energy spectra at large polar angles have been compared with the different experimental results. The integral muon spectrum up to 20 TeV supports the MARS burst data favourably. Using the procedure of Kobayakawa, the muon energy loss in rock due to ionization, pair production, and bremsstrahlung and nuclear interactions from Bezrukov and Bugaev, we have constructed the range–energy relation in Mont Blanc and Kolar Gold Field rocks. The estimated range spectra have been corrected for range fluctuations and have been compared with the Mont Blanc Tunnel data of Castagnoli et al., Bergamasco et al., and Sheldon et al. and the Kolar Gold Field data compilation by Krishnaswamy et al.


1968 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. S617-S619 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Kuzmin ◽  
G. T. Zatsepin

Various effects of high-energy cosmic-ray interactions with cosmic blackbody radiation are considered, particularly the cutoff of the cosmic-ray energy spectrum at [Formula: see text] for protons, and at [Formula: see text] for α particles and other nuclei, as a consequence of photo-production of pions and photodisintegration of nuclei.If quasars and similar objects are indeed the source of high-energy cosmic rays, the protons and nuclei of energy E > (3–10) × 1015 eV would encounter considerable difficulty in being injected from these sources because of interactions with photons, with the result that: (1) the cosmic-ray flux with energy above [Formula: see text] to 3 × 1016 eV may have predominantly proton composition, (2) the cosmic-ray flux may have steeply decreasing intensity in the energy ranpe E = (3–30) × 1015 eV.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (08n09) ◽  
pp. 1950-1961 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEFAN WESTERHOFF

One of the most striking astrophysical phenomena today is the existence of cosmic ray particles with energies in excess of 1020 eV. While their presence has been confirmed by a number of experiments, it is not clear where and how these particles are accelerated to these energies and how they travel astronomical distances without substantial energy loss. We are entering an exciting new era in cosmic ray physics, with instruments now producing data of unprecedented quality and quantity to tackle the many open questions. This paper reviews the current experimental status of cosmic ray physics and summarizes recent results on the energy spectrum and arrival directions of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays.


2019 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 02001
Author(s):  
Sergey Ostapchenko

The differences between contemporary Monte Carlo generators of high energy hadronic interactions are discussed and their impact on the interpretation of experimental data on ultra-high energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) is studied. Key directions for further model improvements are outlined. The prospect for a coherent interpretation of the data in terms of the UHECR composition is investigated.


2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 1145-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Haungs ◽  
Heinigerd Rebel ◽  
Markus Roth

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document