CELL WALL REPLICATION: I. CELL WALL GROWTH OF BACILLUS CEREUS AND BACILLUS MEGATERIUM

1964 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Chung ◽  
R. Z. Hawirko ◽  
P. K. Isaac

Cell wall replication of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus megaterium was studied by differential labelling with fluorescent and non-fluorescent antibody.Growth of new cell wall in B. cereus was initiated near the poles. In the old wall, additional new wall segments gradually developed to form an alternating pattern of new and old wall segments. Further growth elongated the new wall and pushed the old segments apart. Separation of daughter cells appeared to involve splitting of the transverse septa laid down at or near the old wall segments.Growth of new cell wall of B. megaterium was initiated either at one of the poles or at the central area of the cell. Multiple segments of new and old wall appeared along the cell length. Further elongation was followed by formation of transverse septa and separation of daughter cells incorporating either old or new wall segments.Our evidence clearly shows that growth and elongation of the two bacilli do not occur by diffuse intercalation of new cell wall into the old.

1967 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. L. Chung

The pattern of cell wall synthesis as measured by the incorporation of tritiated alanine into the cell wall of Bacillus cereus, and the number of synthesizing sites in the cell wall were studied by the direct and the reverse autoradiographic labelling methods.In the absence of chloramphenicol, the new cell wall was initiated at two or three segments, and later increased to four or five segments which continued to elongate but not to increase in number until the bacilli had made preparation for cell division. Shortly before the centripetal growth of the cell wall and constriction to separate daughter cells, two to three more new wall-segments were added to those already present. The second and third generation cells retained some old wall-segments from the first-generation mother, which remained as discrete clusters of grains, and could easily be distinguished from the new segments.In the presence of chloramphenicol, the new wall was initiated at 8 to 10 sites. Further incubation resulted in the uniform incorporation of labels at multiple sites along the entire cell length.The patterns of new wall replication as studied by the two methods were compared. To account for the difference in synthesizing sites when chloramphenicol is present, it is suggested that the cells have either used the maximum number of sites or have completely bypassed all the sites and allowed the tritiated alanine to diffuse into the wall to become incorporated.


1972 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mauck ◽  
L. Chan ◽  
L. Glaser ◽  
J. Williamson

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Jen Sun ◽  
Fan Bai ◽  
An-Chi Luo ◽  
Xiang-Yu Zhuang ◽  
Tsai-Shun Lin ◽  
...  

AbstractThe dynamic assembly of the cell wall is key to the maintenance of cell shape during bacterial growth. Here, we present a method for the analysis of Escherichia coli cell wall growth at high spatial and temporal resolution, which is achieved by tracing the movement of fluorescently labeled cell wall-anchored flagellar motors. Using this method, we clearly identify the active and inert zones of cell wall growth during bacterial elongation. Within the active zone, the insertion of newly synthesized peptidoglycan occurs homogeneously in the axial direction without twisting of the cell body. Based on the measured parameters, we formulate a Bernoulli shift map model to predict the partitioning of cell wall-anchored proteins following cell division.


1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (20) ◽  
pp. 2547-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Arellano ◽  
A. Duran ◽  
P. Perez

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rho1p GTPase directly activates the (1–3) beta-D-glucan synthase and participates in the regulation of cell wall growth and morphogenesis in this fission yeast. Indirect immunofluorescence experiments using rho1p tagged with hemagglutinin have revealed that rho1p was located at the growing tips during interphase and at the septum prior to cytokinesis, localising to the same areas as actin patches. In S. pombe cdc10-129 mutant cells, arrested in G1, HA-rho1p accumulates at one tip whereas in cdc25-22 mutants, arrested in G2, HA-rho1p accumulates at both tips. In tea1-1 and tea2-1 cdc11-119 mutant cells, HA-rho1p is localised to the new growing tips. Overexpression of different rho1 mutant alleles caused different effects on cortical actin patch distribution, (1–3) beta-D-glucan synthase activation, and sensitivity to cell wall specific antifungal drugs. These results indicate that multiple cellular components are activated by rho1p. Overexpression of the dominant negative rho1T20N allele was lethal as was the rho1+ deletion. Moreover, when rho1+ expression was repressed in actively growing S. pombe, cells died in about 10 to 12 hours. Under these conditions, normal cell morphology was maintained but the level of (1–3) beta-D-glucan synthase activity decreased and the actin patches disappeared. Most cells lysed after cytokinesis during the process of separation, and lysis was not prevented by an osmotic stabiliser. We conclude that rho1p localisation is restricted to growth areas and regulated during the cell cycle and that rho1p is involved in cell wall growth and actin cytoskeleton organisation in S. pombe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document