THE DEVELOPMENTAL ANALYSIS OF ALDEHYDE OXIDASE ACTIVITY IN CIN ALLELIC HETEROZYGOTES OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

1982 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Bentley ◽  
J. H. Williamson

Aldehyde oxidase (AO) activity has been determined at 11 stages during the development of selected cin allelic homo-, hemi- and heterozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster. The AO activity levels found during development were completely consistent with the levels previously reported for adults, less than 24 h of age (Bentley and Williamson, 1979b). All of the cin homo- and hemizygotes tested exhibited no significant levels of AO activity at any of the 11 stages during development. All cin allelic heterozygotes, which were defined as complementing in adults, less than 24 h of age, displayed similar levels of complementation at all stages tested. Conversely, all cin allelic heterozygotes which were defined as noncomplementing in adults, less than 24 h of age, were found to lack measurable AO activity at all developmental stages tested.

Genetics ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-496
Author(s):  
Richard L Roehrdanz ◽  
James M Kitchens ◽  
John C Lucchesi

ABSTRACT Aldehyde oxidase activity has been measured in flies with the structural gene for this enzyme translocated to the X chromosome. These measurements are presented as experimental evidence that, in Drosophila melanogaster, an autosomal gene relocated to the X chromosome is not dosage compensated.


1978 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Williamson ◽  
Michael M. Bentley ◽  
Melvin J. Oliver ◽  
Billy W. Geer

In Drosophila melanogaster aldehyde oxidase occurs in at least two forms that can be separated electrophoretically. The mutant allele lao (low aldehyde oxidase activity) causes a deficiency of the major form of this enzyme. Immunoelectrophoretic analyses suggest that lao homozygotes produce aldehyde oxidase cross-reacting-material in nearly wild-type levels. Although aldehyde oxidase from the mutant stock is heat labile, properties such as Km and pH optima are not different from the normal enzyme.


1978 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva M. Meidinger ◽  
John H. Williamson

Four different genes are known to affect aldehyde oxidase activity (AO) in Drosophila melanogaster. Mutants at each of these loci eliminate AO activity and simultaneously eliminate detectable AO-crossing reacting material (AO-CRM) even though only one is the structural gene for AO (Aldoxn). The other three genes (cin1, lxd and mal) coordinately "control" the levels of activity of AO and two related enzymes, xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) and pyridoxal oxidase (PO). Contrary to their effects on AO-CRM, neither of these three mutants eliminate XDH-CRM. A model of interaction of these enzymes and genes controlling their activities is discussed.


1982 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Bentley ◽  
J. H. Williamson

The effects of five new mal alleles on aldehyde oxidase (AO) and xanthine dehydrogenase (XDH) activities and CRM levels in Drosophila melanogaster are described. These alleles were isolated by taking full advantage of the pleiotropic phenotype exhibited by all previously described mal alleles and represent at least three unique examples of mal function. At least one of these alleles is a representative of a new complementation group. Two other alleles exhibit a wild-type eye color in homozygous stock and one of these is "leaky", exhibiting some 50% of the XDH activity normally found in Oregon-R control flies and some 12% of the AO activity. CRM and activity levels have been quantitated for both enzymes in all allelic heterozygotes. XDH-CRM levels vary only slightly around wild-type levels while AO-CRM levels appear much more sensitive to mutational alterations.


Alcohol ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Jaatinen ◽  
Jarno Riikonen ◽  
Päivi Riihioja ◽  
Olli Kajander ◽  
Antti Hervonen

Genetics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
G K Yasuda ◽  
G Schubiger ◽  
B T Wakimoto

Abstract The vast majority of known male sterile mutants of Drosophila melanogaster fail to produce mature sperm or mate properly. The ms(3) K81(1) mutation is one of a rare class of male sterile mutations in which sterility is caused by developmental arrest after sperm entry into the egg. Previous studies showed that males homozygous for the K81(1) mutation produce progeny that arrest at either of two developmental stages. Most embryos arrest during early nuclear cycles, whereas the remainder are haploid embryos that arrest at a later stage. This description of the mutant phenotype was based on the analysis of a single allele isolated from a natural population. It was therefore unclear whether this unique paternal effect phenotype reflected the normal function of the gene. The genetic analysis and initial molecular characterization of five new K81 mutations are described here. Hemizygous conditions and heteroallelic combinations of the alleles were associated with male sterility caused by defects in embryogenesis. No other mutant phenotypes were observed. Thus, the K81 gene acted as a strict paternal effect gene. Moreover, the biphasic pattern of developmental arrest was common to all the alleles. These findings strongly suggested that the unusual embryonic phenotype caused by all five new alleles was due to loss of function of the K81+ gene. The K81 gene is therefore the first clear example of a strict paternal effect gene in Drosophila. Based on the embryonic lethal phenotypes, we suggest that the K81+ gene encodes a sperm-specific product that is essential for the male pronucleus to participate in the first few embryonic nuclear divisions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document