scholarly journals Restriction enzyme digestion chromosome banding in Crassostrea and Ostrea species: comparative karyological analysis within Ostreidae

Genome ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 781-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Leitão ◽  
R Chaves ◽  
S Santos ◽  
H Guedes-Pinto ◽  
P Boudry

Reliable banding techniques are a major necessity for genetic research in oysters. In this study, we carried out the cytogenetic characterization of four oyster species (family Ostreidae) using restriction endonuclease treatments. Chromosomes were treated with three different restriction enzymes, stained with Giemsa, and examined for banding patterns. The following species were studied: Crassostrea gigas (2n = 20; total number of bands with ApaI, 74; HaeIII, 61; PstI, 76), Crassostrea angulata (2n = 20; ApaI, 62; HaeIII, 61; PstI, 55) (subfamily Crassostreinae), Ostrea edulis (2n = 20; ApaI, 82; HaeIII, 59; PstI, 66), and Ostrea conchaphila (2n = 20; ApaI, 68; HaeIII, 62; PstI, 69) (subfamily Ostreinae). Treatment of samples with ApaI, HaeIII, and PstI produced specific banding patterns, which demonstrates the potential of these enzymes for chromosome banding in oysters. This is of special interest, since it has been recently shown in mammalian chromosomes that restriction enzyme banding is compatible with fluorescence in situ hybridization. This study therefore provides a fundamental step in genome mapping of oysters, since chromosome banding with restriction enzymes facilitates physical gene mapping in these important aquaculture species. The analysis of the banded karyotypes revealed a greater similarity within the genera of Crassostrea and Ostrea than between them.Key words: Ostreidae, Crassostrea, Ostrea, chromosome banding, in situ restriction enzyme banding.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-208
Author(s):  
Ayad Ismaeel

An important approach of therapy the target gene sequence causes diseases via repair/recombine the mutated gene (gene transfer) using a restriction enzymes in the laboratory. This approach will cause multiple problems happening accompany to biological laboratory if ruled out problems outside of it like the digested DNA ran as a smear on an agarose gel, incomplete restriction enzyme digestion, extra bands in the gel, etc. The paper suggested new approach of therapy via repair/replacement mutated gene caused disease by detecting primers and finding restriction enzymes using bioinformatics tools, software, packages etc. then achieving the repair/ recombine of mutations before going to the biologic lab (out-lab) to avoid the problems associated these laboratories. Implement and apply this a proposed therapy approach on TP53 gene (which caused more than 50% of human cancers) and after confirming there is mutations on P53 tumor protein shows an effective cost, friendly therapy methodology and comprehensive.


Genome ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 998-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Stößer ◽  
T. Günther ◽  
C. U. Hesemann

Mitotic metaphase chromosomes of the rye inbred line L 301, which belongs to the Sortiment of the University of Hohenheim, were treated in situ with the restriction enzymes AluI (recognition sequence: 5′-AC/GT-3′), DraI (recognition sequence: 5′-TTT/AAA-3′), and the isoschizomeres HpaII and MspI (recognition sequence: 5′-C/CGG-3′) and stained with Giemsa. The chromosomes indicated similar banding patterns in comparison with the conventional Giemsa-C-banding. However, we have found in rye chromosomes after restrictase treatment that the telomeric bands were reduced in extension. In a lower degree the centromeric bands of individual chromosomes could be absent in dependence of the used restriction enzymes. The number of the intercalary bands were also reduced. Nevertheless, the tested restriction enzymes produced characteristic banding patterns of the rye genome. This uncomplicated banding technique is suited for a very quick banding method of karyotype analysis especially to obtain a first survey of the band patterns on the rye chromosomes.Key words: Secale cereale L., chromosome band pattern, in situ digestion, restriction endonuclease, restriction banding.


2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark M. Collery ◽  
Cyril J. Smyth

The egc locus of Staphylococus aureus harbours two enterotoxin genes (seg and sei) and three enterotoxin-like genes (selm, seln and selo). Between the sei and seln genes are located two pseudogenes, ψent1 and ψent2, or the selu or selu v gene. While these two alternative sei–seln intergenic regions can be distinguished by PCR, to date, DNA sequencing has been the only confirmatory option because of the very high degree of sequence similarity between egc loci bearing the pseudogenes and the selu or selu v gene. In silico restriction enzyme digestion of genomic regions encompassing the egc locus from the 3′ end of the sei gene through the 5′ first quarter of the seln gene allowed pseudogene- and selu- or selu v-bearing egc loci to be distinguished by PCR-RFLP. Experimental application of these findings demonstrated that endonuclease HindIII cleaved PCR amplimers bearing pseudogenes but not those with a selu or selu v gene, while selu- or selu v-bearing amplimers were susceptible to cleavage by endonuclease HphI, but not by endonuclease HindIII. The restriction enzyme BccI cleaved selu- or selu v-harbouring amplimers at a unique restriction site created by their signature 15 bp insertion compared with pseudogene-bearing amplimers, thereby allowing distinction of these egc loci. PCR-RFLP analysis using these restriction enzymes provides a rapid, easy to interpret alternative to DNA sequencing for verification of PCR findings on the nature of an egc locus type, and can also be used for the primary identification of the intergenic sei–seln egc locus type.


Genome ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 1032-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Stuppia ◽  
C. Cinti ◽  
S. Santi ◽  
R. Peila ◽  
N. M. Maraldi ◽  
...  

A series of experiments was carried out to determine the most efficient methods for detecting incorporated nucleotides in the "in situ" restriction enzyme – nick translation technique. Different methods were tested on fixed human metaphase chromosomes using confocal microscopy for the demonstration of the patterns produced. Of the various techniques tested, that using DIG-dUTP in conjunction with FITC-labelled anti-DIG appears to show the greatest sensitivity and specificity. The use of biotinylated nucleotides with FITC-avidin gives rather less sensitivity, while direct labelling with fluorescein-dUTP produces results more rapidly with better chromosome morphology but at the cost of reduced sensitivity. Resorufin-labelled dUTP was unusable, because of the low level of fluorescence and its very rapid fading. The successful fluorescence methods are more sensitive and faster than using horseradish peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase for detection.Key words: restriction enzymes, nick translation, chromosomes, fluorochromes, confocal microscopy.


1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Garagna ◽  
Carlo Alberto Redi ◽  
Paola Veneroni ◽  
Ernesto Capanna ◽  
E. Capanna

Genome ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 652-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ute Hedemann ◽  
M. Schürmann ◽  
E. Schwinger

Human metaphase chromosomes, fixed on slides, have been treated with 8 different restriction endonucleases and 29 combinations of 2 restriction enzymes prior to staining with Giemsa. The endonucleases AluI and DdeI and the combinations AluI + DdeI, AluI + HaeIII, AluI + HinfI, and AluI + MboI have then been used to digest metaphase chromosomes of nine individuals with C-band variants of chromosomes 1 or 9, obtained by the CBG technique. The restriction enzyme resistant chromatin of the paracentromeric regions of chromosomes 1 and 9 has been measured and compared with the corresponding CBG-bands. The size of the enzyme resistant chromatin regions depend upon the type of enzyme(s) used. Treatment with AluI + MboI was the only digestion that acted differently on different chromosome pairs. However, within one pair of homologous chromosomes, all digestions revealed the same variations as conventional C-banding.Key words: C-band variants, heterochromatin, human chromosomes, restriction endonucleases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document