Two Electivity Indices for Feeding with Special Reference to Zooplankton Grazing

1979 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Vanderploeg ◽  
D. Scavia

The electivity indices Ei and Ei′ of predator–prey interaction are currently used to quantify particle-size selection by grazers. Under conditions of passive, mechanical particle-size selection predicted by the leaky-sieve model, these indices yield electivity vs. particle-size curves that vary with the shape of the particle-size spectrum of food offered to the zooplankton. In addition to this bias, poor estimates of electivity will be obtained unless only a small fraction of the food is eaten in such experiments. The selectivity coefficient (Wi) used by modelers in feeding constructs and the electivity index Ei*, derived here, are recommended instead because they do not suffer from the shortcomings described for Ei and Ei′. Moreover, use of Wi′s and Ei*'s is recommended for quantifying selection for many other cases of predator–prey interaction. Key words: electivity indices, selectivity, selective grazing, predator–prey intraction

1981 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. A. Vanderploeg

Diaptomus sicilis feeding on offshore Lake Michigan seston exhibited a relatively invariant pattern of particle-size selection in 23 separate feeding experiments conducted from spring through fall over a 2-yr period. This pattern persisted for different feeding rates under varying conditions of particle-size spectrum shape, abundance and food quality of particles, and temperature. Selection was quantified by calculating W′ (filtering efficiency) as a function of particle size (equivalent spherical diameter). In all but one of the few experiments yielding a W′ curve that varied appreciably from the other W′ curves, serious bias from grazer-produced particles was evident and/or elongated particles dominated the seston. The elongated particles could have led to deviations because of differences in filtering efficiency between round and elongated particles of small volume and because elongated particles of large volume have to be captured raptorially. It is argued that the more variable patterns of particle-size selection observed in many of the other studies of zooplankton feeding on natural seston result from: (1) improper methods of quantifying selection, (2) serious bias from grazer-produced particles, and (3) varying particle shape, which is not usually specified. The mechanisms of particle selection by Diaptomus and other species that filter like Diaptomus are reviewed, and it is noted that invariant selection is not inconsistent with both filtering and raptorial modes of feeding operating simultaneously. All the evidence points to a strong passive-mechanical filtering mode of feeding that may be supplemented by a raptorial mode of feeding that selects large particles of high food quality.Key words: Diaptomus sicilis, particle-size selection, filter feeding, peak tracking, passive selection, Lake Michigan, food selectivity


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document