RAPID DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE IN GRAIN: II. CALIBRATION AND COMPARISON OF ELECTRICAL MOISTURE METERS WITH VACUUM OVEN FOR HARD RED SPRING WHEAT
The electrical moisture meters studied were: the Burton-Pitt, Davies, Limbrick, hand-operated and motor-operated Tag-Heppenstall. The Burton-Pitt is a "dielectric" type; all the others depend on the resistance principle.The calibration curve for the Burton-Pitt instrument is parabolic within the range 11.0 to 17.0% moisture. The resistance type instruments all show a linear relation between moisture content and the logarithm of the resistance at moisture contents below 17.0%, and a parabolic relation at higher moisture contents. The accuracy of the meters, as determined by the experimental errors and the standard error of prediction of the vacuum oven moisture, decreases in the following order within the moisture range, 11.0 to 17.0%: motor-operated Tag-Heppenstall, Limbrick, hand-operated Tag-Heppenstall, Burton-Pitt and Davies. At higher moisture contents than 17.0% the Burton-Pitt and Davies instruments are definitely unreliable, and the remaining meters are also less precise.The temperature coefficient of the wheat-instrument system was found to be appreciably different from that of the wheat alone in the Limbrick and Burton-Pitt. The temperature coefficient was also found to differ somewhat in different moisture ranges. The effect of humidity is most pronounced in the Limbrick, but is in all instruments small in comparison with that of temperature. The limited number of low grade samples studied appeared to follow the same calibration curve as high grade samples in all meters and 28 samples of the hard-kernelled variety Garnet were also found to follow the calibration curve deduced from the general reliability experiments in all meters, with the exception of the hand-operated Tag-Heppenstall. The discrepancy with this meter is not great and can be attributed to the roll space being unsuitable for this hard-kernelled variety.The moisture range satisfactorily covered by the instruments decreases in the order: motor-operated Tag-Heppenstall, hand-operated Tag-Heppenstall, Limbrick, Burton-Pitt and Davies. In all cases the upper limit is finally determined by the increasing inaccuracy of the meter, rather than by its physical range, which is limited at 21.5% moisture with the Limbrick only when used at the highest sensitivity. With wheat below 11.0% moisture, only the Burton-Pitt and Tag-Heppenstall instruments can be used, and the calibration curve for the Burton-Pitt obtained with wheat of higher moisture content cannot be extrapolated over this lower range.