Analysis of interspecific variation in plant growth responses to nitrogen

2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R Taub

Plant species differ greatly in their growth responses to nutrients, but little is known about the physiological and morphological factors that are responsible for this variation. To address this question, I measured the responses to added nitrogen of relative growth rate and three of its components (specific leaf area, unit leaf rate, and leaf weight ratio) for 17 C3 grass species. Plants were grown in sand culture in a greenhouse and were fertilized daily with either 5 or 0.05 mM NH4NO3. For most species, growth response to nitrogen was primarily associated with an increased mass allocation to leaves at high versus low nitrogen. Across all species, the average response at high versus low nitrogen was a 37% increase in leaf weight ratio, a 12% increase in unit leaf rate, and a 4% decrease in specific leaf area. Interspecific differences in growth response to nitrogen, however, were associated primarily with species differences in the response of unit leaf area to nitrogen supply. I determined the nitrogen response ratio of each parameter as the value of the parameter at high nitrogen divided by the value at low nitrogen. The rank-order correlation between the unit leaf area response ratio and the relative growth rate response ratio was 0.88. Reanalysis of previous experiments on plant nutrient response showed a similar pattern. In all studies, interspecific variation in the response of relative growth rate to nutrients was associated primarily with interspecific differences in the plastic response of unit leaf area.Key words: leaf weight ratio, net assimilation rate, plant growth analysis, relative growth rate, specific leaf area, unit leaf rate.

1996 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Van Der Werf ◽  
C.T. Enserink ◽  
A.L. Smit ◽  
R. Booij

Young vegetative Brussels sprout and leek plants were grown in a growth chamber at a light intensity of 550 micro mol m-2 s-1 or at only 20% of that intensity. In both light treatments, Brussels sprouts had a relative growth rate (RGR) ~90% higher than that of leeks, which was mainly explained by a higher leaf area ratio (LAR; msuperscript 2/kg plant). Only minor differences in the physiological component (net assimilation rate) were observed between the 2 species within a light treatment. The higher LAR of Brussels sprouts was mainly explained by higher specific leaf area. Brussels sprouts had a higher rate of biomass production per unit internal N (N productivity) than leeks. This was mainly explained by a higher allocation of N to leaves and a higher rate of biomass production per unit leaf N. It is suggested that the higher biomass production per unit of N taken up in Brussels sprouts than leeks as observed in the field is explained by higher N productivity. The results obtained from the growth chamber studies are discussed in relation to field experiments and data from the literature.


2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Aparecida Giacomini ◽  
Sila Carneiro da Silva ◽  
Daniel Oliveira de Lucena Sarmento ◽  
Cauê Varesqui Zeferino ◽  
Salim Jacaúna Souza Júnior ◽  
...  

Grazing strategies alter sward leaf area patterns of growth, affecting herbage accumulation and utilisation. The objective of this experiment was to evaluate the growth of marandu palisadegrass (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu) swards subjected to strategies of intermittent stocking. The experiment was carried out in Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, from October/2004 to September/2005. Swards were grazed at 95 and 100% canopy light interception (LI) to post-grazing heights of 10 and 15 cm, following a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement with four replications in a randomised complete block design. The response variables evaluated were: crop growth rate, relative growth rate, net assimilation rate, leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio. In early and late spring, the highest crop growth rate was recorded for treatment 95/15 (11.2 and 10.1 g m-2 day-1, respectively), along with high values of net assimilation rate (4.4 and 6.9 g m-2 day-1, respectively), leaf area ratio (0.0095 and 0.0103 m-2 g-1, respectively) and leaf weight ratio (0.56 and 0.56 g g-1, respectively). To compensate reductions in net assimilation rate plants made some morphological and physiological adjustments increasing leaf area and leaf weight ratio. Relative growth rate and net assimilation rate were 26 and 50% higher, respectively, on swards grazed at 95% than at 100% LI. In early spring treatments 100/10 and 95/15 resulted in the highest relative growth rate (0.086 and 0.059 g m-2 day-1, respectively). Treatment 95/15 resulted in the most favourable pattern of growth (crop growth rate, relative growth rate, net assimilation rate), particularly during the transition period between winter and spring.


HortScience ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 810D-810
Author(s):  
John R. Teasdale ◽  
Aref A. Abdul-Baki ◽  
William J.E. Potts

Dry weight and leaf area of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants grown on raised beds with black polyethylene (BP) or hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) (HV) mulches were measured at weekly intervals during 1993 and 1994. Leaf area and foliage, fruit, and total weight of tomato plants grown in BP were greater early in the season, but less later in the season than plants grown in HV. The relative growth rate of tomatoes in HV was higher throughout most of each year than that in BP. There was little difference between treatments in unit leaf rate (rate of weight gain per unit leaf area). The growth rate of fruit per unit of tomato foliage was greater in BP than HV, whereas the leaf area to weight ratio was greater in HV than BP. These results suggest that tomatoes grown in BP produce greater early yield because of greater early foliage growth and greater partitioning to fruit than HV. However, tomatoes grown in HV eventually outgrow and outyield those in BP because of greater partitioning to and maintenance of leaf area throughout the season.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document