scholarly journals Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) card test. A screening method for treponemal disease.

1971 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-262
Author(s):  
A N Walker
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-443
Author(s):  
John C. Herweg ◽  
F. Donald Hoffmann ◽  
Charles A. Reed

In the United States, in 1966, 370 infants under 1 year of age were reported as having congenital syphilis. This is a twofold increase since 1957. Despite this fact, routine serologic testing for syphilis is not done on most infants and children hospitalized in the United States. For use in those institutions where routine serologic testing for syphilis is felt to be desirable, the Rapid Plasma Reagin (Circle) Card Test has been found to be a simple, practical, and inexpensive screening method.


1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-18
Author(s):  
D A Black ◽  
P E Ray ◽  
B L Therrell

After a preliminary study of 557 sera used as a procedural training exercise, the Reagin screen test (RST) for the macroscopic detection of reagin (as an aid to detecting syphilis) was qualitatively compared to the rapid plasma Reagin (RPR) (circle) card test and Veneral Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) slide test on 435 random portions of sera using fluorescent treponemal antibody adsorption (FTA-ABS) results as a comparative base. A comparison of total agreement (positive and negative) with the FTA-ABS results led to the following order. RPRCT (I5.5%), VDRL (79.8%), and RST (74.5%). Of the total samples shown to be reactive by the FTA-ABS procedure, the percentage of these interpreted as nonreactive (i.e., "false negative") by the procedures compared was considerably higher with the RST procedure (29.3%) than with either the RPRCT (10.9%) or the VDRL (7.1%) procedures. Minor problems encountered with procedural techniques are also mentioned.


1964 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia H. Falcone ◽  
Genevieve W. Stout ◽  
M. Brittain Moore, Jr.

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (12) ◽  
pp. e005664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Han Lee ◽  
Chae Seung Lim ◽  
Min-Geol Lee ◽  
Hyon-Suk Kim

1989 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-189
Author(s):  
G S Fischer ◽  
M T Colavita ◽  
W I Sweimler ◽  
B Kleger

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDDY VAN DYCK ◽  
LUC VAN DE VELDEN ◽  
C BlOL ◽  
IBRAHIM NDOYE ◽  
PETER PIOT ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 593-595
Author(s):  
P E Dziuk ◽  
D A Black ◽  
B L Therrell

A qualitative evaluation of the newly marketed Syphla-Chek Test (Hyland, Div. of Travenol Laboratories, Inc., Costa Mesa, Calif.), a macroscopically read, nontreponemal card test, was undertaken in order to further evaluate the validity of this procedure as an aid in the diagnosis of syphilis. A total of 1,074 randomly selected sera submitted to the Texas Department of Health Resources for routine analysis, for confirmational analysis, and as a result of problems in analysis, were examined using the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) slide test, the Rapid Plasma Reagin (circle) Card Test (RPRCT), Syphla-Chek Test, and the fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test. Comparison of the reagin testing procedures studied versus the FTA-ABS procedure led to the following order of agreement with FTA-ABS reactive results: Syphla-Chek, 88.8%; RPRCT, 87.1%; and VDRL, 83.2%. Agreement with FTA-ABS nonreactive results was in order: RPRCT, 86.7%; Syphla-Chek, 79.6%; and VDRL, 78.7%. The relatively few minor procedural problems encountered with the Syphla-Chek Test during this study are also discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document