scholarly journals Methodological standards for qualitative and mixed methods patient centered outcomes research

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4435
Author(s):  
Bridget Gaglio ◽  
Michelle Henton ◽  
Amanda Barbeau ◽  
Emily Evans ◽  
David Hickam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Patient Centered

scholarly journals Recommendations for a Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluating the Patient-Centered Medical Home

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Goldman ◽  
D. R. Parker ◽  
J. Brown ◽  
J. Walker ◽  
C. B. Eaton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Medical Home ◽  
Patient Centered Medical Home ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach

Stakeholder impact on the implementation of integrated care: Opportunities to consider for patient-centered outcomes research

2020 ◽  
pp. 106256
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Kearney ◽  
Kelly Williams ◽  
Cara Nikolajski ◽  
Margaret Park ◽  
Kevin L. Kraemer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Integrated Care ◽  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Patient Centered

scholarly journals FP02.08 Importance of Stakeholder Engagement in a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S192
Author(s):  
V. Musigdilok ◽  
B. Creekmur ◽  
E. Rozema ◽  
M. Gould
Keyword(s):  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Stakeholder Engagement ◽  
Patient Centered

scholarly journals Co-production of the quality of patient-centered outcomes research partnerships instrument for people with mental health conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-156
Author(s):  
Karen L. Fortuna ◽  
Amanda Myers ◽  
Jessica Brooks ◽  
Caroline Collins-Pisano ◽  
Skyla Marceau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Outcomes Research ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Research Partnerships ◽  
Mental Health Conditions

scholarly journals Advancing Patient-Centered Care in Tuberculosis Management: A Mixed-Methods Appraisal of Video Directly Observed Therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel B Holzman ◽  
Avi Zenilman ◽  
Maunank Shah
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Medication Adherence ◽  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Directly Observed Therapy ◽  
Patient Privacy ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Self Administration ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Adherence Monitoring

Abstract Background Directly observed therapy (DOT) remains an integral component of treatment support and adherence monitoring in tuberculosis care. In-person DOT is resource intensive and often burdensome for patients. Video DOT (vDOT) has been proposed as an alternative to increase treatment flexibility and better meet patient-specific needs. Methods We conducted a pragmatic, prospective pilot implementation of vDOT at 3 TB clinics in Maryland. A mixed-methods approach was implemented to assess (1) effectiveness, (2) acceptability, and (3) cost. Medication adherence on vDOT was compared with that of in-person DOT. Interviews and surveys were conducted with patients and providers before and after implementation, with framework analysis utilized to extract salient themes. Last, a cost analysis assessed the economic impacts of vDOT implementation across heterogeneous clinic structures. Results Medication adherence on vDOT was comparable to that of in-person DOT (94% vs 98%, P = .17), with a higher percentage of total treatment doses (inclusive of weekend/holiday self-administration) ultimately observed during the vDOT period (72% vs 66%, P = .03). Video DOT was well received by staff and patients alike, who cited increased treatment flexibility, convenience, and patient privacy. Our cost analysis estimated a savings with vDOT of $1391 per patient for a standard 6-month treatment course. Conclusions Video DOT is an acceptable and important option for measurement of TB treatment adherence and may allow a higher proportion of prescribed treatment doses to be observed, compared with in-person DOT. Video DOT may be cost-saving and should be considered as a component of individualized, patient-centered case management plans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document