scholarly journals Mus81-Eme1-Dependent and -Independent Crossovers Form in Mitotic Cells during Double-Strand Break Repair in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3828-3838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin C. Hope ◽  
Lissette Delgado Cruzata ◽  
Amit Duvshani ◽  
Jun Mitsumoto ◽  
Mohamed Maftahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Synthetic Lethality ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Holliday Junctions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Fourfold Increase ◽  
Dependent Pathway ◽  
Mitotic Cells

ABSTRACT During meiosis, double-strand breaks (DSBs) lead to crossovers, thought to arise from the resolution of double Holliday junctions (HJs) by an HJ resolvase. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, meiotic crossovers are produced primarily through a mechanism requiring the Mus81-Eme1 endonuclease complex. Less is known about the processes that produces crossovers during the repair of DSBs in mitotic cells. We employed an inducible DSB system to determine the role of Rqh1-Top3 and Mus81-Eme1 in mitotic DSB repair and crossover formation in S. pombe. In agreement with the meiotic data, crossovers are suppressed in cells lacking Mus81-Eme1. And relative to the wild type, rqh1Δ cells show a fourfold increase in crossover frequency. This suppression of crossover formation by Rqh1 is dependent on its helicase activity. We found that the synthetic lethality of cells lacking both Rqh1 and Eme1 is suppressed by loss of swi5 +, which allowed us to show that the excess crossovers formed in an rqh1Δ background are independent of Mus81-Eme1. This result suggests that a second process for crossover formation exists in S. pombe and is consistent with our finding that deletion of swi5 + restored meiotic crossovers in eme1Δ cells. Evidence suggesting that Rqh1 also acts downstream of Swi5 in crossover formation was uncovered in these studies. Our results suggest that during Rhp51-dependent repair of DSBs, Rqh1-Top3 suppresses crossovers in the Rhp57-dependent pathway while Mus81-Eme1 and possibly Rqh1 promote crossovers in the Swi5-dependent pathway.

scholarly journals Palindromes as Substrates for Multiple Pathways of Recombination in Escherichia coli

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth A Cromie ◽  
Catherine B Millar ◽  
Kristina H Schmidt ◽  
David R F Leach
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Recq Helicase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Imperfect Palindrome ◽  
Dependent Pathway

Abstract A 246-bp imperfect palindrome has the potential to form hairpin structures in single-stranded DNA during replication. Genetic evidence suggests that these structures are converted to double-strand breaks by the SbcCD nuclease and that the double-strand breaks are repaired by recombination. We investigated the role of a range of recombination mutations on the viability of cells containing this palindrome. The palindrome was introduced into the Escherichia coli chromosome by phage λ lysogenization. This was done in both wt and sbcC backgrounds. Repair of the SbcCD-induced double-strand breaks requires a large number of proteins, including the components of both the RecB and RecF pathways. Repair does not involve PriA-dependent replication fork restart, which suggests that the double-strand break occurs after the replication fork has passed the palindrome. In the absence of SbcCD, recombination still occurs, probably using a gap substrate. This process is also PriA independent, suggesting that there is no collapse of the replication fork. In the absence of RecA, the RecQ helicase is required for palindrome viability in a sbcC mutant, suggesting that a helicase-dependent pathway exists to allow replicative bypass of secondary structures.

scholarly journals Role of the Nuclease Activity ofSaccharomyces cerevisiaeMre11 in Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Mitotic Cells

Genetics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 166 (4) ◽  
pp. 1701-1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Kevin Lewis ◽  
Francesca Storici ◽  
Stephen Van Komen ◽  
Shanna Calero ◽  
Patrick Sung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Complex Functions ◽  
Mitotic Cells

AbstractThe Rad50:Mre11:Xrs2 (RMX) complex functions in repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by recombination and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and is also required for telomere stability. The Mre11 subunit exhibits nuclease activities in vitro, but the role of these activities in repair in mitotic cells has not been established. In this study we have performed a comparative study of three mutants (mre11-D16A, -D56N, and -H125N) previously shown to have reduced nuclease activities in vitro. In ends-in and ends-out chromosome recombination assays using defined plasmid and oligonucleotide DNA substrates, mre11-D16A cells were as deficient as mre11 null strains, but defects were small in mre11-D56N and -H125N mutants. mre11-D16A cells, but not the other mutants, also displayed strong sensitivity to ionizing radiation, with residual resistance largely dependent on the presence of the partially redundant nuclease Exo1. mre11-D16A mutants were also most sensitive to the S-phase-dependent clastogens hydroxyurea and methyl methanesulfonate but, as previously observed for D56N and H125N mutants, were not defective in NHEJ. Importantly, the affinity of purified Mre11-D16A protein for Rad50 and Xrs2 was indistinguishable from wild type and the mutant protein formed complexes with equivalent stoichiometry. Although the role of the nuclease activity has been questioned in previous studies, the comparative data presented here suggest that the nuclease function of Mre11 is required for RMX-mediated recombinational repair and telomere stabilization in mitotic cells.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 423 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea J. Hartlerode ◽  
Ralph Scully
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Information ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

DNA chromosomal DSBs (double-strand breaks) are potentially hazardous DNA lesions, and their accurate repair is essential for the successful maintenance and propagation of genetic information. Two major pathways have evolved to repair DSBs: HR (homologous recombination) and NHEJ (non-homologous end-joining). Depending on the context in which the break is encountered, HR and NHEJ may either compete or co-operate to fix DSBs in eukaryotic cells. Defects in either pathway are strongly associated with human disease, including immunodeficiency and cancer predisposition. Here we review the current knowledge of how NHEJ and HR are controlled in somatic mammalian cells, and discuss the role of the chromatin context in regulating each pathway. We also review evidence for both co-operation and competition between the two pathways.

Double-Strand Break-Induced Mitotic Intrachromosomal Recombination in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fekret Osman ◽  
Elizabeth A Fortunato ◽  
Suresh Subramani
Keyword(s):  
Schizosaccharomyces Pombe ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Direct Repeats ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Intrachromosomal Recombination ◽  
Intervening Sequences ◽  
Ho Gene

Abstract The Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene and MATa cutting site were used to introduce site-specific double-strand breaks (DSBs) within intrachromosomal recombination substrates in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The recombination substrates consisted of nontandem direct repeats of ade6 heteroalleles. DSB induction stimulated the frequency of recombinants 2000-fold. The spectrum of DSB-induced recombinants depended on whether the DSB was introduced within one of the ade6 repeats or in intervening unique DNA. When the DSB was introduced within unique DNA, over 99.8% of the recombinants lacked the intervening DNA but retained one copy of ade6 that was wild type or either one of the heteroalleles. When the DSB was located in duplicated DNA, 77% of the recombinants were similar to the deletion types described above, but the single ade6 copy was either wild type or exclusively that of the uncut repeat. The remaining 23% of the induced recombinants were gene convertants with two copies of ade6 and the intervening sequences; the ade6 heteroallele in which the DSB was induced was the recipient of genetic information. Half-sectored colonies were isolated, analyzed and interpreted as evidence of heteroduplex DNA formation. The results are discussed in terms of current models for recombination.

The Homologous Chromosome Is an Effective Template for the Repair of Mitotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (4) ◽  
pp. 1831-1842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yikang S Rong ◽  
Kent G Golic
Keyword(s):  
Gene Conversion ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Homologous Chromosome ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Mitotic Cells

AbstractIn recombinational DNA double-strand break repair a homologous template for gene conversion may be located at several different genomic positions: on the homologous chromosome in diploid organisms, on the sister chromatid after DNA replication, or at an ectopic position. The use of the homologous chromosome in mitotic gene conversion is thought to be limited in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cells. In contrast, by studying the repair of double-strand breaks generated by the I-SceI rare-cutting endonuclease, we find that the homologous chromosome is frequently used in Drosophila melanogaster, which we suggest is attributable to somatic pairing of homologous chromosomes in mitotic cells of Drosophila. We also find that Drosophila mitotic cells of the germ line, like yeast, employ the homologous recombinational repair pathway more often than imperfect nonhomologous end joining.

scholarly journals Physiological Roles of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhaan A. Khan ◽  
Syed O. Ali
Keyword(s):  
Double Helix ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genomic Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Spatiotemporal Regulation ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

Genomic integrity is constantly threatened by sources of DNA damage, internal and external alike. Among the most cytotoxic lesions is the DNA double-strand break (DSB) which arises from the cleavage of both strands of the double helix. Cells boast a considerable set of defences to both prevent and repair these breaks and drugs which derail these processes represent an important category of anticancer therapeutics. And yet, bizarrely, cells deploy this very machinery for the intentional and calculated disruption of genomic integrity, harnessing potentially destructive DSBs in delicate genetic transactions. Under tight spatiotemporal regulation, DSBs serve as a tool for genetic modification, widely used across cellular biology to generate diverse functionalities, ranging from the fundamental upkeep of DNA replication, transcription, and the chromatin landscape to the diversification of immunity and the germline. Growing evidence points to a role of aberrant DSB physiology in human disease and an understanding of these processes may both inform the design of new therapeutic strategies and reduce off-target effects of existing drugs. Here, we review the wide-ranging roles of physiological DSBs and the emerging network of their multilateral regulation to consider how the cell is able to harness DNA breaks as a critical biochemical tool.

scholarly journals Focused Genetic Recombination of Bacteriophage T4 Initiated by Double-Strand Breaks

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-556
Author(s):  
Victor Shcherbakov ◽  
Igor Granovsky ◽  
Lidiya Plugina ◽  
Tamara Shcherbakova ◽  
Svetlana Sizova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Recombination ◽  
Bacteriophage T4 ◽  
Proximal Part ◽  
Coupling Model ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
The Right ◽  
Frequency Distance

Abstract A model system for studying double-strand-break (DSB)-induced genetic recombination in vivo based on the ets1 segCΔ strain of bacteriophage T4 was developed. The ets1, a 66-bp DNA fragment of phage T2L containing the cleavage site for the T4 SegC site-specific endonuclease, was inserted into the proximal part of the T4 rIIB gene. Under segC+ conditions, the ets1 behaves as a recombination hotspot. Crosses of the ets1 against rII markers located to the left and to the right of ets1 gave similar results, thus demonstrating the equal and symmetrical initiation of recombination by either part of the broken chromosome. Frequency/distance relationships were studied in a series of two- and three-factor crosses with other rIIB and rIIA mutants (all segC+) separated from ets1 by 12-2100 bp. The observed relationships were readily interpretable in terms of the modified splice/patch coupling model. The advantages of this localized or focused recombination over that distributed along the chromosome, as a model for studying the recombination-replication pathway in T4 in vivo, are discussed.

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document