Profits, prejudice, and plant patents

Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 367 (6477) ◽  
pp. 517-517
Author(s):  
Helen Anne Curry
Keyword(s):  
1937 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 261-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALBERT E. FAY
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 08 (10) ◽  
pp. 540-545
Author(s):  
Albert Wai Kit Chan ◽  
Jason Chih-Sheng Lin

The article discusses about trade secrets, trademarks and patents and plant patents. It is about the intellectual property protection while dealing with natural products.


Science ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 305 (5680) ◽  
pp. 40b-40b ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Thomas
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-106
Author(s):  
Fred B. Widmoyer

This paper recommends cooperation between researchers, public gardens and nurserymen in a project to properly name, release and document new plant releases to the industry. Leadership for registration of woody plants not specifically assigned to any other society has been assigned to the American Association of Botanical Gardens and Arboreta (AABGA). Greater participation may be stimulated by publication of articles on registration in various media; development of interactive programs between nurserymen, public gardens, universities and the Office of Plant Patents; involvement of state representatives interested in stimulating the use of the International Code of Cultivated Plants—1980. Programs are in various stages of implementation.


HortScience ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 864e-864
Author(s):  
Mark Hubbard ◽  
John Kelly ◽  
Albert Abbott ◽  
Robert Ballard

To protect plant patents, rose breeders would benefit from a reliable and sensitive method for differentiating cultivars at the genetic level. Rcombinant DNA technologies are being employed to characterize individual DNA structure of numerous rose cultivars. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) are being studied to develop a characteristic pattern, or fingerprint for each cultivar. DNA from various cultivars is restriction enzyme digested and the fragments separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The gel is Southern blotted and hybridized with probes from the rose DNA library to yield RFLPs. RFLPs are being located and will eventually result in a characteristic fingerprint for each cultivar.


1933 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
Sylvester J. Liddy
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
James N. Moore

The strategy of plant patenting as a means to generate research funds is gaining increasing interest in fruit breeding programs in public institutions. Patenting can be a positive force in maintaining fruit breeding programs if applied to superior cultivars and supported by well-designed licensing and distribution procedures. To qualify for a plant patent, a cultivar must be distinct, new, and asexually propagated, and cannot be in public use or on sale more than 1 year prior to the application for patent. Plant patents provide protection only for the whole plant as described. In contrast, utility patents can be obtained to provide proprietary rights to individual plant genes, plant characteristics, and plant products. The possible impact of utility patents on future fruit breeding programs is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document