CELL CYCLE: Some Importin News About Spindle Assembly

Science ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 291 (5509) ◽  
pp. 1718-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kahana
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly

Cell cycle regulation of central spindle assembly

Nature ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 430 (7002) ◽  
pp. 908-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masanori Mishima ◽  
Visnja Pavicic ◽  
Ulrike Grüneberg ◽  
Erich A. Nigg ◽  
Michael Glotzer
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulation ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Central Spindle ◽  
Cycle Regulation

scholarly journals Microtubule Cytoskeleton Remodeling by Acentriolar Microtubule-organizing Centers at the Entry and Exit from Mitosis in Drosophila Somatic Cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2796-2808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Moutinho-Pereira ◽  
Alain Debec ◽  
Helder Maiato
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Animal Cell ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Entry And Exit ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Microtubule Organizing Centers ◽  
Cytoskeleton Remodeling

Cytoskeleton microtubules undergo a reversible metamorphosis as cells enter and exit mitosis to build a transient mitotic spindle required for chromosome segregation. Centrosomes play a dominant but dispensable role in microtubule (MT) organization throughout the animal cell cycle, supporting the existence of concurrent mechanisms that remain unclear. Here we investigated MT organization at the entry and exit from mitosis, after perturbation of centriole function in Drosophila S2 cells. We found that several MTs originate from acentriolar microtubule-organizing centers (aMTOCs) that contain γ-tubulin and require Centrosomin (Cnn) for normal architecture and function. During spindle assembly, aMTOCs associated with peripheral MTs are recruited to acentriolar spindle poles by an Ncd/dynein-dependent clustering mechanism to form rudimentary aster-like structures. At anaphase onset, down-regulation of CDK1 triggers massive formation of cytoplasmic MTs de novo, many of which nucleated directly from aMTOCs. CDK1 down-regulation at anaphase coordinates the activity of Msps/XMAP215 and the kinesin-13 KLP10A to favor net MT growth and stability from aMTOCs. Finally, we show that microtubule nucleation from aMTOCs also occurs in cells containing centrosomes. Our data reveal a new form of cell cycle–regulated MTOCs that contribute for MT cytoskeleton remodeling during mitotic spindle assembly/disassembly in animal somatic cells, independently of centrioles.

scholarly journals The Maize Homologue of the Cell Cycle Checkpoint Protein MAD2 Reveals Kinetochore Substructure and Contrasting Mitotic and Meiotic Localization Patterns

1999 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Guo Yu ◽  
Michael G. Muszynski ◽  
R. Kelly Dawe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Outer Domain ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis ◽  
Meiosis I

We have identified a maize homologue of yeast MAD2, an essential component in the spindle checkpoint pathway that ensures metaphase is complete before anaphase begins. Combined immunolocalization of MAD2 and a recently cloned maize CENPC homologue indicates that MAD2 localizes to an outer domain of the prometaphase kinetochore. MAD2 staining was primarily observed on mitotic kinetochores that lacked attached microtubules; i.e., at prometaphase or when the microtubules were depolymerized with oryzalin. In contrast, the loss of MAD2 staining in meiosis was not correlated with initial microtubule attachment but was correlated with a measure of tension: the distance between homologous or sister kinetochores (in meiosis I and II, respectively). Further, the tension-sensitive 3F3/2 phosphoepitope colocalized, and was lost concomitantly, with MAD2 staining at the meiotic kinetochore. The mechanism of spindle assembly (discussed here with respect to maize mitosis and meiosis) is likely to affect the relative contributions of attachment and tension. We support the idea that MAD2 is attachment-sensitive and that tension stabilizes microtubule attachments.

Comparison of the effects of BPA and BPAF on oocyte spindle assembly and polar body release in mice

Zygote ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Nakano ◽  
Manami Nishio ◽  
Norio Kobayashi ◽  
Yuuki Hiradate ◽  
Yumi Hoshino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Oocyte Maturation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Polar Body ◽  
Sharp Decrease ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Environmental Chemical ◽  
Cell Cycle Delay ◽  
A Cell

SummaryBisphenol AF (BPAF), a homolog of bisphenol A (BPA), is a widely used environmental chemical that has adverse effects on reproduction. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of BPA and BPAF exposure on oocyte maturation in vitro. Oocytes were cultured in the presence of BPA or BPAF (2, 20, 50 or 100 μg/ml) for 18 h. At concentrations of 50 and 100 μg/ml, BPA and BPAF inhibited oocyte maturation, with BPAF treatment causing a sharp decrease in the number of oocytes reaching maturity. Oocytes were exposed to BPA or BPAF at 2 μg/ml and cultured for different durations (6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 h). Both BPAF and BPA caused a cell cycle delay under these conditions. Oocytes cultured in the presence of BPA or BPAF (50 μg/ml) for 21 h were tested for the localization of α-tubulin and MAD2 using immunofluorescence. High concentrations of BPAF induced cell cycle arrest through the activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint. After 12 h of culture in BPAF (50 μg/ml), oocytes were transferred to control medium for 9 h. Only 63.3% oocytes treated in this manner progressed to metaphase II (MII). Oocytes exposed to high doses of BPA experienced a cell cycle delay, but managed to progress to MII when the culture period was prolonged. In addition, MAD2 was localized in the cytoplasm of these oocytes. In conclusion, both BPAF and BPA exposure affected oocyte maturation, however BPAF and BPA have differential effects on SAC activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document