p53 DOES NOT CONTROL THE SPINDLE ASSEMBLY CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT BUT MEDIATES G1 ARREST IN RESPONSE TO DISRUPTION OF MICROTUBULE SYSTEM

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 323-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sablina
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Assembly Cell ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint

scholarly journals The Maize Homologue of the Cell Cycle Checkpoint Protein MAD2 Reveals Kinetochore Substructure and Contrasting Mitotic and Meiotic Localization Patterns

1999 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Guo Yu ◽  
Michael G. Muszynski ◽  
R. Kelly Dawe
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Protein ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
Outer Domain ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitosis And Meiosis ◽  
Meiosis I

We have identified a maize homologue of yeast MAD2, an essential component in the spindle checkpoint pathway that ensures metaphase is complete before anaphase begins. Combined immunolocalization of MAD2 and a recently cloned maize CENPC homologue indicates that MAD2 localizes to an outer domain of the prometaphase kinetochore. MAD2 staining was primarily observed on mitotic kinetochores that lacked attached microtubules; i.e., at prometaphase or when the microtubules were depolymerized with oryzalin. In contrast, the loss of MAD2 staining in meiosis was not correlated with initial microtubule attachment but was correlated with a measure of tension: the distance between homologous or sister kinetochores (in meiosis I and II, respectively). Further, the tension-sensitive 3F3/2 phosphoepitope colocalized, and was lost concomitantly, with MAD2 staining at the meiotic kinetochore. The mechanism of spindle assembly (discussed here with respect to maize mitosis and meiosis) is likely to affect the relative contributions of attachment and tension. We support the idea that MAD2 is attachment-sensitive and that tension stabilizes microtubule attachments.

Cell Cycle Checkpoint Genes and Aneuploidy: A Short Review

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Kearns ◽  
Johnson Liu
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

scholarly journals Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 750
Author(s):  
Kiyohiro Ando ◽  
Akira Nakagawara
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint

Unrestrained proliferation is a common feature of malignant neoplasms. Targeting the cell cycle is a therapeutic strategy to prevent unlimited cell division. Recently developed rationales for these selective inhibitors can be subdivided into two categories with antithetical functionality. One applies a “brake” to the cell cycle to halt cell proliferation, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle kinases. The other “accelerates” the cell cycle to initiate replication/mitotic catastrophe, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. The fate of cell cycle progression or arrest is tightly regulated by the presence of tolerable or excessive DNA damage, respectively. This suggests that there is compatibility between inhibitors of DNA repair kinases, such as PARP inhibitors, and inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. In the present review, we explore alterations to the cell cycle that are concomitant with altered DNA damage repair machinery in unfavorable neuroblastomas, with respect to their unique genomic and molecular features. We highlight the vulnerabilities of these alterations that are attributable to the features of each. Based on the assessment, we offer possible therapeutic approaches for personalized medicine, which are seemingly antithetical, but both are promising strategies for targeting the altered cell cycle in unfavorable neuroblastomas.

scholarly journals A DNA-Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoint in Arabidopsis

Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 164 (1) ◽  
pp. 323-334
Author(s):  
S B Preuss ◽  
A B Britt
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Gamma Radiation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle

Abstract Although it is well established that plant seeds treated with high doses of gamma radiation arrest development as seedlings, the cause of this arrest is unknown. The uvh1 mutant of Arabidopsis is defective in a homolog of the human repair endonuclease XPF, and uvh1 mutants are sensitive to both the toxic effects of UV and the cytostatic effects of gamma radiation. Here we find that gamma irradiation of uvh1 plants specifically triggers a G2-phase cell cycle arrest. Mutants, termed suppressor of gamma (sog), that suppress this radiation-induced arrest and proceed through the cell cycle unimpeded were recovered in the uvh1 background; the resulting irradiated plants are genetically unstable. The sog mutations fall into two complementation groups. They are second-site suppressors of the uvh1 mutant's sensitivity to gamma radiation but do not affect the susceptibility of the plant to UV radiation. In addition to rendering the plants resistant to the growth inhibitory effects of gamma radiation, the sog1 mutation affects the proper development of the pollen tetrad, suggesting that SOG1 might also play a role in the regulation of cell cycle progression during meiosis.

scholarly journals Centrosome Dynamics and Its Role in Inflammatory Response and Metastatic Process

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 629
Author(s):  
Massimo Pancione ◽  
Luigi Cerulo ◽  
Andrea Remo ◽  
Guido Giordano ◽  
Álvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Rho Gtpases ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Genetic Disorders ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Animal Cells ◽  
Normal Tissues ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
New Findings ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint

Metastasis is a process by which cancer cells escape from the location of the primary tumor invading normal tissues at distant organs. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of human cancer, associated with metastasis and therapeutic resistance. The centrosome plays a major role in organizing the microtubule cytoskeleton in animal cells regulating cellular architecture and cell division. Loss of centrosome integrity activates the p38-p53-p21 pathway, which results in cell-cycle arrest or senescence and acts as a cell-cycle checkpoint pathway. Structural and numerical centrosome abnormalities can lead to aneuploidy and CIN. New findings derived from studies on cancer and rare genetic disorders suggest that centrosome dysfunction alters the cellular microenvironment through Rho GTPases, p38, and JNK (c-Jun N-terminal Kinase)-dependent signaling in a way that is favorable for pro-invasive secretory phenotypes and aneuploidy tolerance. We here review recent data on how centrosomes act as complex molecular platforms for Rho GTPases and p38 MAPK (Mitogen activated kinase) signaling at the crossroads of CIN, cytoskeleton remodeling, and immune evasion via both cell-autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms.

Advancing maternal age compromises control of cell cycle checkpoint for aneuploidies in human embryos cultured in vitro

2002 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. S181
Author(s):  
H Asakura ◽  
K.P Katayama ◽  
E.F Stehlik ◽  
J.C Stehlik ◽  
K Winchester-Peden
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Human Embryos ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document