The effect of dose uncertainty on community noise dose-response outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. A101-A101
Author(s):  
Richard D. Horonjeff
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Community Noise ◽  
Dose Uncertainty

The effect of modeling dose uncertainty on low-boom community noise dose-response curves

2021 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. A259-A259
Author(s):  
William Doebler ◽  
Aaron B. Vaughn ◽  
Kathryn Ballard ◽  
Jonathan Rathsam
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Community Noise ◽  
Dose Response Curves ◽  
Dose Uncertainty

ANNOYANCE AND COMMUNITY NOISE: PSYCHOPHYSICAL MODEL OF DOSE – RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Baird ◽  
Kathleen Harder ◽  
Anna Preis
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Community Noise

scholarly journals Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (56) ◽  
pp. 97-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Berrington de Gonzalez ◽  
Robert D Daniels ◽  
Elisabeth Cardis ◽  
Harry M Cullings ◽  
Ethel Gilbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Systematic Bias ◽  
Cancer Risks ◽  
Low Dose Radiation ◽  
Dose Uncertainty

Abstract Whether low-dose ionizing radiation can cause cancer is a critical and long-debated question in radiation protection. Since the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation report by the National Academies in 2006, new publications from large, well-powered epidemiological studies of low doses have reported positive dose-response relationships. It has been suggested, however, that biases could explain these findings. We conducted a systematic review of epidemiological studies with mean doses less than 100 mGy published 2006–2017. We required individualized doses and dose-response estimates with confidence intervals. We identified 26 eligible studies (eight environmental, four medical, and 14 occupational), including 91 000 solid cancers and 13 000 leukemias. Mean doses ranged from 0.1 to 82 mGy. The excess relative risk at 100 mGy was positive for 16 of 22 solid cancer studies and 17 of 20 leukemia studies. The aim of this monograph was to systematically review the potential biases in these studies (including dose uncertainty, confounding, and outcome misclassification) and to assess whether the subset of minimally biased studies provides evidence for cancer risks from low-dose radiation. Here, we describe the framework for the systematic bias review and provide an overview of the eligible studies.

Some Statistical Implications of Dose Uncertainty in Radiation Dose–Response Analyses

2006 ◽  
Vol 166 (1) ◽  
pp. 303-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Schafer ◽  
Ethel S. Gilbert
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Dose Uncertainty

Dose-Response Relationships to Pancreozymin in Normal Subjects and Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis

1963 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald H. Hanscom ◽  
Armand Littman ◽  
Jack V. Pinto
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pancreatitis ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Normal Subjects

291 Normal myocardial dose-response to dobutamine as assessed by tissue Doppler stress echocardiography

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. S47-S47
Author(s):  
N PAYNE ◽  
R GROCOTTMASON ◽  
A IONESCU ◽  
B SJOBERG ◽  
I SANDBLOM ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Tissue Doppler

Dose-Response Relationships Do Exist: More Treatment Is Better

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. B. Hansen ◽  
M. J. Lambert ◽  
E. M. Forman
Keyword(s):  
Dose Response
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document