scholarly journals Information-criterion based selection of models for community noise annoyance

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. EL195-EL201 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Keith Wilson ◽  
Dan Valente ◽  
Edward T. Nykaza ◽  
Chris L. Pettit
1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Koziol

AbstractA basic problem of cluster analysis is the determination or selection of the number of clusters evinced in any set of data. We address this issue with multinomial data using Akaike’s information criterion and demonstrate its utility in identifying an appropriate number of clusters of tumor types with similar profiles of cell surface antigens.


Weed Science ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 628-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Jasieniuk ◽  
Mark L. Taper ◽  
Nicole C. Wagner ◽  
Robert N. Stougaard ◽  
Monica Brelsford ◽  
...  

Empirical models of crop–weed competition are integral components of bioeconomic models, which depend on predictions of the impact of weeds on crop yields to make cost-effective weed management recommendations. Selection of the best empirical model for a specific crop–weed system is not straightforward, however. We used information–theoretic criteria to identify the model that best describes barley yield based on data from barley–wild oat competition experiments conducted at three locations in Montana over 2 yr. Each experiment consisted of a complete addition series arranged as a randomized complete block design with three replications. Barley was planted at 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 times the locally recommended seeding rate. Wild oat was planted at target infestation densities of 0, 10, 40, 160, and 400 plants m−2. Twenty-five candidate yield models were used to describe the data from each location and year using maximum likelihood estimation. Based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), a second-order small-sample version ofAIC(AICc), and the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), most data sets supported yield models with crop density (Dc), weed density (Dw), and the relative time of emergence of the two species (T) as variables, indicating that all variables affected barley yield in most locations.AIC,AICc, andBICselected identical best models for all but one data set. In contrast, the Information Complexity criterion,ICOMP, generally selected simpler best models with fewer parameters. For data pooled over years and locations,AIC,AICc, andBICstrongly supported a single best model with variablesDc,Dw,T, and a functional form specifying both intraspecific and interspecific competition.ICOMPselected a simpler model withDcandDwonly, and a functional form specifying interspecific, but no intraspecific, competition. The information–theoretic approach offers a rigorous, objective method for choosing crop yield and yield loss equations for bioeconomic models.


2013 ◽  
Vol 677 ◽  
pp. 357-362
Author(s):  
Natthasurang Yasungnoen ◽  
Patchanok Srisuradetchai

Model selection procedures play important role in many researches especially quantitative research. . In several area of sciences, the analysis and model selection of experiments are often used and often contains two fundamental goals associated with the experimental response of interest which are to determine the best model. The way to address these goals is to implement a model selection procedure. Then, the objectives of this research are to determine whether or not the final models selected are in agreement or differ substantially across the three approaches to model selection: using Akaike’s Information Criterion, using a p-value criterion, and using a stepwise procedure.. Generally, results from these three models are usually compare to each other. All selected models are based on the heredity principle to design the possible model for each design. The actual data from literature, consisting of the 2x3 and 32 and 3x4 factorial designs are used to determine the final model. The results show that the P-Value WH and Stepwise methods give the highest percentage of matched model.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-236
Author(s):  
Ayşe Van ◽  
Aysun Gümüş ◽  
Melek Özpiçak ◽  
Serdar Süer

By the study's coverage, 522 individuals of tentacled blenny (Parablennius tentacularis (Brünnich, 1768)), were caught with the bottom trawl operations (commercial fisheries and scientific field surveys) between May 2010 and March 2012 from the southeastern Black Sea. The size distribution range of the sample varied between 4.8-10.8 cm. The difference between sex length (K-S test, Z=3.729, P=0.000) and weight frequency distributions (K-S test, Z=3.605, P=0.000) was found to be statistically significant. The length-weight relationship models were defined as isometric with W = 0.009L3.034 in male individuals and positive allometric with W = 0.006L3.226 in female individuals. Otolith and vertebra samples were compared for the selection of the most accurate hard structure that can be used to determine the age. Otolith was chosen as the most suitable hard structure. The current data set was used to predict the best growth model. For this purpose, the growth parameters were estimated with the widely used von Bertalanffy, Gompertz and Logistic growth functions. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC), Lmak./L∞ ratio, and R2 criteria were used to select the most accurate growth models established through these functions. Model averaged parameters were calculated with multi-model inference (MMI): L'∞ = 15.091 cm, S.E. (L'∞) = 3.966, K'= 0.232 year-1, S.E. (K') = 0.122.


2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 3095-3095
Author(s):  
Maurice E. Hayward ◽  
Jonathan Rathsam ◽  
D. K. Wilson ◽  
Edward T. Nykaza ◽  
Nicole M. Wayant

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Rathsam ◽  
Maurice Hayward ◽  
Laure-Anne Gille ◽  
Edward Nykaza ◽  
Nicole Wayant

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 549-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Susko ◽  
Andrew J Roger

Abstract The information criteria Akaike information criterion (AIC), AICc, and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) are widely used for model selection in phylogenetics, however, their theoretical justification and performance have not been carefully examined in this setting. Here, we investigate these methods under simple and complex phylogenetic models. We show that AIC can give a biased estimate of its intended target, the expected predictive log likelihood (EPLnL) or, equivalently, expected Kullback–Leibler divergence between the estimated model and the true distribution for the data. Reasons for bias include commonly occurring issues such as small edge-lengths or, in mixture models, small weights. The use of partitioned models is another issue that can cause problems with information criteria. We show that for partitioned models, a different BIC correction is required for it to be a valid approximation to a Bayes factor. The commonly used AICc correction is not clearly defined in partitioned models and can actually create a substantial bias when the number of parameters gets large as is the case with larger trees and partitioned models. Bias-corrected cross-validation corrections are shown to provide better approximations to EPLnL than AIC. We also illustrate how EPLnL, the estimation target of AIC, can sometimes favor an incorrect model and give reasons for why selection of incorrectly under-partitioned models might be desirable in partitioned model settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document