Speaking rate modulates lexical competition in online speech perception.

2009 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 2657-2657
Author(s):  
Eva Reinisch ◽  
Alexandra Jesse ◽  
James M. McQueen
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Lexical Competition

scholarly journals Cortical Tracking of Global and Local Variations of Speech Rhythm during Connected Natural Speech Perception

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 1704-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Maria Alexandrou ◽  
Timo Saarinen ◽  
Jan Kujala ◽  
Riitta Salmelin
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Parietal Cortex ◽  
Temporal Structure ◽  
Temporal Cortex ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Natural Speech ◽  
Speech Signals ◽  
Speech Rhythm ◽  
Linguistic Information ◽  
Evolutionary Tuning

During natural speech perception, listeners must track the global speaking rate, that is, the overall rate of incoming linguistic information, as well as transient, local speaking rate variations occurring within the global speaking rate. Here, we address the hypothesis that this tracking mechanism is achieved through coupling of cortical signals to the amplitude envelope of the perceived acoustic speech signals. Cortical signals were recorded with magnetoencephalography (MEG) while participants perceived spontaneously produced speech stimuli at three global speaking rates (slow, normal/habitual, and fast). Inherently to spontaneously produced speech, these stimuli also featured local variations in speaking rate. The coupling between cortical and acoustic speech signals was evaluated using audio–MEG coherence. Modulations in audio–MEG coherence spatially differentiated between tracking of global speaking rate, highlighting the temporal cortex bilaterally and the right parietal cortex, and sensitivity to local speaking rate variations, emphasizing the left parietal cortex. Cortical tuning to the temporal structure of natural connected speech thus seems to require the joint contribution of both auditory and parietal regions. These findings suggest that cortical tuning to speech rhythm operates on two functionally distinct levels: one encoding the global rhythmic structure of speech and the other associated with online, rapidly evolving temporal predictions. Thus, it may be proposed that speech perception is shaped by evolutionary tuning, a preference for certain speaking rates, and predictive tuning, associated with cortical tracking of the constantly changing-rate of linguistic information in a speech stream.

scholarly journals Individual Differences in Lexical Access Among Cochlear Implant Users

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 286-304
Author(s):  
Leanne Nagels ◽  
Roelien Bastiaanse ◽  
Deniz Başkent ◽  
Anita Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Cochlear Implant ◽  
Lexical Access ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Decision Task ◽  
Lexical Competition ◽  
Sensitivity Experiment ◽  
Sentential Context ◽  
Lower Accuracy

Purpose The current study investigates how individual differences in cochlear implant (CI) users' sensitivity to word–nonword differences, reflecting lexical uncertainty, relate to their reliance on sentential context for lexical access in processing continuous speech. Method Fifteen CI users and 14 normal-hearing (NH) controls participated in an auditory lexical decision task (Experiment 1) and a visual-world paradigm task (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 tested participants' reliance on lexical statistics, and Experiment 2 studied how sentential context affects the time course and patterns of lexical competition leading to lexical access. Results In Experiment 1, CI users had lower accuracy scores and longer reaction times than NH listeners, particularly for nonwords. In Experiment 2, CI users' lexical competition patterns were, on average, similar to those of NH listeners, but the patterns of individual CI users varied greatly. Individual CI users' word–nonword sensitivity (Experiment 1) explained differences in the reliance on sentential context to resolve lexical competition, whereas clinical speech perception scores explained competition with phonologically related words. Conclusions The general analysis of CI users' lexical competition patterns showed merely quantitative differences with NH listeners in the time course of lexical competition, but our additional analysis revealed more qualitative differences in CI users' strategies to process speech. Individuals' word–nonword sensitivity explained different parts of individual variability than clinical speech perception scores. These results stress, particularly for heterogeneous clinical populations such as CI users, the importance of investigating individual differences in addition to group averages, as they can be informative for clinical rehabilitation. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11368106

scholarly journals Effects of Stimulus Variability on Speech Perception in Listeners With Hearing Impairment

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 1395-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Iler Kirk ◽  
David B. Pisoni ◽  
R. Christopher Miyamoto
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Word Identification ◽  
Recognition Performance ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Speech Understanding ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Stimulus Variability

Traditional word-recognition tests typically use phonetically balanced (PB) word lists produced by one talker at one speaking rate. Intelligibility measures based on these tests may not adequately evaluate the perceptual processes used to perceive speech under more natural listening conditions involving many sources of stimulus variability. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of stimulus variability and lexical difficulty on the speech-perception abilities of 17 adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The effects of stimulus variability were studied by comparing word-identification performance in single-talker versus multipletalker conditions and at different speaking rates. Lexical difficulty was assessed by comparing recognition of "easy" words (i.e., words that occur frequently and have few phonemically similar neighbors) with "hard" words (i.e., words that occur infrequently and have many similar neighbors). Subjects also completed a 20-item questionnaire to rate their speech understanding abilities in daily listening situations. Both sources of stimulus variability produced significant effects on speech intelligibility. Identification scores were poorer in the multiple-talker condition than in the single-talker condition, and word-recognition performance decreased as speaking rate increased. Lexical effects on speech intelligibility were also observed. Word-recognition performance was significantly higher for lexically easy words than lexically hard words. Finally, word-recognition performance was correlated with scores on the self-report questionnaire rating speech understanding under natural listening conditions. The pattern of results suggest that perceptually robust speech-discrimination tests are able to assess several underlying aspects of speech perception in the laboratory and clinic that appear to generalize to conditions encountered in natural listening situations where the listener is faced with many different sources of stimulus variability. That is, wordrecognition performance measured under conditions where the talker varied from trial to trial was better correlated with self-reports of listening ability than was performance in a single-talker condition where variability was constrained.

scholarly journals Units of processing in perceptual normalization for speaking rate

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meg Cychosz ◽  
Rochelle Newman
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Acoustic Signatures ◽  
Syllable Duration ◽  
Normalization Effect

Because speaking rates are highly variable, listeners must use cues like phoneme or sentence duration to scale or normalize speech across different contexts. Scaling speech perception in this way allows listeners to distinguish between temporal contrasts, like voiced and voiceless stops, even at different speech speeds. It has long been assumed that this normalization or adjustment of speaking rate can occur over individual phonemes. However, phonemes are often undefined in running speech, so it is not clear that listeners can rely on them for normalization. To evaluate this, we isolate two potential processing units for speaking rate normalization---the phoneme and the syllable---by manipulating phoneme duration in order to cue speaking rate, while also holding syllable duration constant. In doing so, we show that changing the duration of phonemes both with unique acoustic signatures (/k\textscripta/) and overlapping acoustic signatures (/w\textsci/) results in a speaking rate normalization effect. These results suggest that even absent clear acoustic boundaries within syllables, listeners can normalize for rate differences on the basis of individual phonemes.

scholarly journals Nonword Repetition by Children With Cochlear Implants

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1103-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin M. Dillon ◽  
Rose A. Burkholder ◽  
Miranda Cleary ◽  
David B. Pisoni
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Cochlear Implants ◽  
Phonological Processing ◽  
Oral Communication ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Nonword Repetition ◽  
Phonological Working Memory ◽  
Verbal Rehearsal

Seventy-six children with cochlear implants completed a nonword repetition task. The children were presented with 20 nonword auditory patterns over a loud-speaker and were asked to repeat them aloud to the experimenter. The children's responses were recorded on digital audiotape and then played back to normal-hearing adult listeners to obtain accuracy ratings on a 7-point scale. The children's nonword repetition performance, as measured by these perceptual accuracy ratings, could be predicted in large part by their performance on independently collected measures of speech perception, verbal rehearsal speed, and speech production. The strongest contributing variable was speaking rate, which is widely argued to reflect verbal rehearsal speed in phonological working memory. Children who had become deaf at older ages received higher perceptual ratings. Children whose early linguistic experience and educational environments emphasized oral communication methods received higher perceptual ratings than children enrolled in total communication programs. The present findings suggest that individual differences in performance on nonword repetition are strongly related to variability observed in the component processes involved in language imitation tasks, including measures of speech perception, speech production, and especially verbal rehearsal speed in phonological working memory. In addition, onset of deafness at a later age and an educational environment emphasizing oral communication may be beneficial to the children's ability to develop the robust phonological processing skills necessary to accurately repeat novel, nonword sound patterns.

Age Differences in the Effects of Speaking Rate on Auditory, Visual, and Auditory-Visual Speech Perception

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell S. Sommers ◽  
Brent Spehar ◽  
Nancy Tye-Murray ◽  
Joel Myerson ◽  
Sandra Hale
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Visual Speech ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Visual Speech Perception

Predictability and perception for native and non-native listeners

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (s2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Baese-Berk ◽  
Tuuli H. Morrill ◽  
Laura Dilley
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Native Speakers ◽  
Spoken Language ◽  
Target Language ◽  
Speaking Rate ◽  
Lexical Frequency ◽  
Function Words ◽  
Phonological Structure ◽  
Phonological Knowledge ◽  
Rate Frequency

AbstractPhonological knowledge is influenced by a variety of cues that reflect predictability (e.g. semantic predictability). Listeners utilize various aspects of predictability when determining what they have heard. In the present paper, we ask how aspects of the acoustic phonetic signal (e.g. speaking rate) interact with other knowledge reflecting predictability (e.g. lexical frequency and collocation strength) to influence how speech is perceived. Specifically, we examine perception of function words by native and non-native speakers. Our results suggest that both native and non-native speakers are sensitive to factors that influence the predictability of the signal, including speaking rate, frequency, and collocation strength, when listening to speech, and use these factors to predict the phonological structure of stretches of ambiguous speech. However, reliance on these cues differs as a function of their experience and proficiency with the target language. Non-native speakers are less sensitive to some aspects of the acoustic phonetic signal (e.g. speaking rate). However, they appear to be quite sensitive to other factors, including frequency. We discuss how these results inform our understanding of the interplay between predictability and speech perception by different listener populations and how use of features reflecting predictability interacts with recovery of phonological structure of spoken language.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document