Apparatus for a portable electronic device

2010 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 2707
Author(s):  
Chuan-Kung Hou
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Device ◽  
Portable Electronic Device

Objective Human Gustatory Sensitivity Assessment Through a Portable Electronic Device

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleonora Sulas ◽  
Alice Evelina Martis ◽  
Piero Cosseddu ◽  
Andrea Achilli ◽  
Giorgia Sollai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Device ◽  
Sensitivity Assessment ◽  
Portable Electronic Device

Portable electronic device

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 588
Author(s):  
Yo Nagasawa ◽  
Michiaki Koizumi
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Device ◽  
Portable Electronic Device

Comparison of video recording and a portable electronic device for measuring the feeding behaviour of individually housed dairy goats

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 58-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Desnoyers ◽  
G. Béchet ◽  
C. Duvaux-Ponter ◽  
P. Morand-Fehr ◽  
S. Giger-Reverdin
Keyword(s):  
Feeding Behaviour ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Dairy Goats ◽  
Portable Electronic Device

scholarly journals Factors that Determine the Purchase of Portable Electronic Devices

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
ANTONIO CARLOS GUIDI ◽  
NADIA KASSOUF PIZZINATTO ◽  
MARIA IMACULADA MONTEBELO
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Descriptive Statistics ◽  
Electronic Market ◽  
Ornamental Stone ◽  
Portable Electronic Device ◽  
Main Factors ◽  
Technological Opportunities

The study aims to discover the consumer profile and the main factors that lead them to acquire a portable electronic device (PED). An online survey was conducted, with a sample of 145 consumers involved in the beneficiation of the ornamental stone sector. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were applied for data analysis. This article makes advances in the development of concepts of management design, the electronic market and information systems, and uses a revised bibliography, proposing interaction with the list of strategies. The results show that, at the time of purchase, consumers of portable electronic devices take into account interconnected factors, such as brand, design and utility. Thus, we conclude that there is an interest in products that have proven multifunctionality, and also encourages research that confirms the consumer profile in expanded samples. The implications are discussed, with an emphasis on developing the new competencies that retailers need to develop, to interact with their physical configurations, through technological opportunities with mobile functionalities.

scholarly journals Pilot Perceptions on the Integration of Electronic Flight Bag Information in New Flight Deck Designs

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Michelle Yeh ◽  
Joseph Jaworski ◽  
Stephanie Chase
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Device ◽  
Touch Screen ◽  
Concurrent Use ◽  
Portable Electronic Device ◽  
Electronic Chart ◽  
Usability Data ◽  
Flight Deck ◽  
Navigation Information

The purpose of this study was to gather usability data on a new flight deck concept in which pilots are shown certified and uncertified information concurrently on installed avionics. Specifically, we wanted to examine perceptions on the concepts of concurrent use and differentiation for electronic flight bag (EFB) applications that show ownship position. We presented an uncertified electronic chart on either a portable electronic device (PED) alone (off to the pilot’s side) or on both a PED and an installed flight deck display. The uncertified electronic chart was always shown concurrently with an approved navigation source. We differentiated the electronic chart from the navigation information via display medium (portable vs. installed) and a header labeled “EFB,” drawn at the top of the uncertified electronic chart on the installed display. Thirteen flightcrews flew eight scenarios using the flight deck concept. Pilots liked the concurrent display of the electronic chart, and the repeated display functionality, in particular, because they could control the presentation of information on the forward display using the touch screen on the side display. Our method of differentiation—a header—was less successful and suggests a need to consider the potential for stimulus habituation when evaluating these techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document