Perceptual processing time in audition

1975 ◽  
Vol 57 (S1) ◽  
pp. S5-S5
Author(s):  
Dominic W. Massaro
Keyword(s):  
Processing Time ◽  
Perceptual Processing

Image and Perceptual Representation of Words in Learning Disabled and Normal Children

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-81
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. McCoy ◽  
Robert J. Weber
Keyword(s):  
Processing Time ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Time Effect ◽  
Perceptual Processing ◽  
Mode Interaction ◽  
Perceptual Representation ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Processing Mode ◽  
Perceptual Representations

Results of the present study indicated that learning disabled and normal children (x age = 111.4 months) process letters in words in either perceptual or imaginal modes for the attribute letter height. A large processing time effect was noted for mode of representation with perceptual representations of letters processed more rapidly than imaginal representations. There was also a subject-type-by-processing mode interaction. The results indicate that LD and normal children do not differ in perceptual processing time; however, LD children have a smaller image capacity than normals. Correlational results also suggest that the imaginal mode is more independent of other modes for normals than for LDs.

Perceptual processing time differences owing to visual field asymmetries

Neuroreport ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 1067-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony N. Carlsen ◽  
Dana Maslovat ◽  
Romeo Chua ◽  
Ian M. Franks
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Processing Time ◽  
Perceptual Processing

Stimulus Duration and Visual Processing Time

1971 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Goodglass
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Duration ◽  
Visual Processing ◽  
Interstimulus Interval ◽  
Processing Time ◽  
Recognition Threshold ◽  
Perceptual Processing ◽  
Masking Effect ◽  
Target Exposure

This study investigated the effect of small changes in tachistoscopic exposure of target stimuli on the length of interstimulus interval required to eliminate the masking effect of a subsequent stimulus. This interstimulus interval, termed the Critical ISI, is regarded as the perceptual processing time for the target. At target exposures near the 90% recognition threshold, each 2 msec. increase in target exposure reduced the critical ISI by 30 msec.

A new tool for rapid development of electron microscopy negatives and micrographs: Initial impressions of the MOHR/PRO-8 processor

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 972-973
Author(s):  
James C. Long
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Processing Time ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Processing Times ◽  
Initial Impressions ◽  
Transport Method

Over the years, many techniques and products have been developed to reduce the amount of time spent in a darkroom processing electron microscopy negatives and micrographs. One of the latest tools, effective in this effort, is the Mohr/Pro-8 film and rc paper processor.At the time of writing, a unit has been recently installed in the photographic facilities of the Electron Microscopy Center at Texas A&M University. It is being evaluated for use with TEM sheet film, SEM sheet film, 35mm roll film (B&W), and rc paper.Originally designed for use in the phototypesetting industry, this processor has only recently been introduced to the field of electron microscopy.The unit is a tabletop model, approximately 1.5 × 1.5 × 2.0 ft, and uses a roller transport method of processing. It has an adjustable processing time of 2 to 6.5 minutes, dry-to-dry. The installed unit has an extended processing switch, enabling processing times of 8 to 14 minutes to be selected.

The Mere Exposure Effect and Recognition Depend on the Way You Look! *S. W. and J. D. contributed equally to this study.

2010 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Willems ◽  
Jonathan Dedonder ◽  
Martial Van der Linden
Keyword(s):  
Differential Effect ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Mere Exposure ◽  
Perceptual Processing ◽  
Processing Strategy ◽  
Mere Exposure Effect ◽  
Exposure Effect ◽  
Processing Strategies ◽  
Explicit Recognition ◽  
Analytic Strategy

In line with Whittlesea and Price (2001) , we investigated whether the memory effect measured with an implicit memory paradigm (mere exposure effect) and an explicit recognition task depended on perceptual processing strategies, regardless of whether the task required intentional retrieval. We found that manipulation intended to prompt functional implicit-explicit dissociation no longer had a differential effect when we induced similar perceptual strategies in both tasks. Indeed, the results showed that prompting a nonanalytic strategy ensured performance above chance on both tasks. Conversely, inducing an analytic strategy drastically decreased both explicit and implicit performance. Furthermore, we noted that the nonanalytic strategy involved less extensive gaze scanning than the analytic strategy and that memory effects under this processing strategy were largely independent of gaze movement.

Classifying the Past: Discriminant Analysis and its Application to Medieval Farming Systems

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Bartley
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Processing Time ◽  
Farming Systems ◽  
Frame Of Reference ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Medieval Period ◽  
The Past ◽  
Livestock Management

This paper discusses the need for nationally based analytical models of the medieval period. The use of cluster analysis as a method for classifying demesne farms, by the crops they grew and their livestock management, is explained. Successful implementation of cluster analysis requires both the existence of a large base sample, to permit isolation of specific groupings within the data, and access to considerable processing time. The paper concludes by demonstrating how discriminant analysis can provide an efficient and systematic way of classifying even a single manor within a national frame of reference.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document