The temporal growth and decay of the auditory motion aftereffect

2004 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 3112-3123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Neelon ◽  
Rick L. Jenison
2003 ◽  
Vol 180 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Neelon ◽  
Rick L. Jenison

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 282-287
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Orlov ◽  
Alisa Gvozdeva ◽  
Victoria Zavyalova ◽  
Vadim Ushakov ◽  
Irina Andreeva

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Vroomen ◽  
Beatrice de Gelder

In this study, we show that the contingent auditory motion aftereffect is strongly influenced by visual motion information. During an induction phase, participants listened to rightward-moving sounds with falling pitch alternated with leftward-moving sounds with rising pitch (or vice versa). Auditory aftereffects (i.e., a shift in the psychometric function for unimodal auditory motion perception) were bigger when a visual stimulus moved in the same direction as the sound than when no visual stimulus was presented. When the visual stimulus moved in the opposite direction, aftereffects were reversed and thus became contingent upon visual motion. When visual motion was combined with a stationary sound, no aftereffect was observed. These findings indicate that there are strong perceptual links between the visual and auditory motion-processing systems.


1997 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 3141-3141
Author(s):  
C. J. Dong ◽  
N. V. Swindale ◽  
P. Zakarauskas ◽  
V. Haywood ◽  
M. S. Cynader

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Berger ◽  
H. Henrik Ehrsson

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minsun Park ◽  
Randolph Blake ◽  
Yeseul Kim ◽  
Chai-Youn Kim

AbstractSensory information registered in one modality can influence perception associated with sensory information registered in another modality. The current work focuses on one particularly salient form of such multisensory interaction: audio-visual motion perception. Previous studies have shown that watching visual motion and listening to auditory motion influence each other, but results from those studies are mixed with regard to the nature of the interactions promoting that influence and where within the sequence of information processing those interactions transpire. To address these issues, we investigated whether (i) concurrent audio-visual motion stimulation during an adaptation phase impacts the strength of the visual motion aftereffect (MAE) during a subsequent test phase, and (ii) whether the magnitude of that impact was dependent on the congruence between auditory and visual motion experienced during adaptation. Results show that congruent direction of audio-visual motion during adaptation induced a stronger initial impression and a slower decay of the MAE than did the incongruent direction, which is not attributable to differential patterns of eye movements during adaptation. The audio-visual congruency effects measured here imply that visual motion perception emerges from integration of audio-visual motion information at a sensory neural stage of processing.


1966 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 1003-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHIGEMASA SUMI
Keyword(s):  

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ii48 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 479-479
Author(s):  
S.C Boyle ◽  
R Jenkins ◽  
M Lages

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document