scholarly journals Neural Substrates of the Auditory Motion Aftereffect: A Functional MRI Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 282-287
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav Orlov ◽  
Alisa Gvozdeva ◽  
Victoria Zavyalova ◽  
Vadim Ushakov ◽  
Irina Andreeva
2003 ◽  
Vol 180 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Neelon ◽  
Rick L. Jenison

Neuroreport ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Schik Yoo ◽  
Daniel K. Freeman ◽  
James J. McCarthy ◽  
Ferenc A. Jolesz

2010 ◽  
Vol 1308 ◽  
pp. 114-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Midori Shibata ◽  
Akira Toyomura ◽  
Hiroaki Itoh ◽  
Jun-ichi Abe

Psychology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (10) ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Terrien ◽  
Fabien Gierski ◽  
Stéphanie Caillies ◽  
Véronique Baltazart ◽  
Christophe Portefaix ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Vroomen ◽  
Beatrice de Gelder

In this study, we show that the contingent auditory motion aftereffect is strongly influenced by visual motion information. During an induction phase, participants listened to rightward-moving sounds with falling pitch alternated with leftward-moving sounds with rising pitch (or vice versa). Auditory aftereffects (i.e., a shift in the psychometric function for unimodal auditory motion perception) were bigger when a visual stimulus moved in the same direction as the sound than when no visual stimulus was presented. When the visual stimulus moved in the opposite direction, aftereffects were reversed and thus became contingent upon visual motion. When visual motion was combined with a stationary sound, no aftereffect was observed. These findings indicate that there are strong perceptual links between the visual and auditory motion-processing systems.


1997 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 3141-3141
Author(s):  
C. J. Dong ◽  
N. V. Swindale ◽  
P. Zakarauskas ◽  
V. Haywood ◽  
M. S. Cynader

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document