scholarly journals The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 820-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Turner ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Maryam Khatonabadi ◽  
Maria Zankl ◽  
John J. DeMarco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (6Part24) ◽  
pp. 402-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Leng ◽  
M Shiung ◽  
X Duan ◽  
L Yu ◽  
Y Zhang ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 779-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Zanca ◽  
Martine Demeter ◽  
Raymond Oyen ◽  
Hilde Bosmans
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
M. Sutto ◽  
A. Maldera ◽  
M. Maddalo ◽  
P.E. Colombo ◽  
A. Torresin

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 8961
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Weihai Zhuo ◽  
Yiyang Zhao ◽  
Tianwu Xie ◽  
Chuyan Wang ◽  
...  

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to preliminarily estimate patient-specific organ doses in chest CT examinations for Chinese adults, and to investigate the effect of patient size on organ doses. Methods: By considering the body-size and body-build effects on the organ doses and taking the mid-chest water equivalent diameter (WED) as a body-size indicator, the chest scan images of 18 Chinese adults were acquired on a multi-detector CT to generate the regional voxel models. For each patient, the lungs, heart, and breasts (glandular breast tissues for both breasts) were segmented, and other organs were semi-automated segmented based on their HU values. The CT scanner and patient models simulated by MCNPX 2.4.0 software (Los Alamos National LaboratoryLos Alamos, USA) were used to calculate lung, breast, and heart doses. CTDIvol values were used to normalize simulated organ doses, and the exponential estimation model between the normalized organ dose and WED was investigated. Results: Among the 18 patients in this study, the simulated doses of lung, heart, and breast were 18.15 ± 2.69 mGy, 18.68 ± 2.87 mGy, and 16.11 ± 3.08 mGy, respectively. Larger patients received higher organ doses than smaller ones due to the higher tube current used. The ratios of lung, heart, and breast doses to the CTDIvol were 1.48 ± 0.22, 1.54 ± 0.20, and 1.41 ± 0.13, respectively. The normalized organ doses of all the three organs decreased with the increase in WED, and the normalized doses decreased more obviously in the lung and the heart than that in the breasts. Conclusions: The output of CT scanner under ATCM is positively related to the attenuation of patients, larger-size patients receive higher organ doses. The organ dose normalized by CTDIvol was negatively correlated with patient size. The organ doses could be estimated by using the indicated CTDIvol combined with the estimated WED.


2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-449
Author(s):  
Einas H Bashier ◽  
I I Suliman

Abstract In this study, we thought to estimate the radiation exposure of children undergoing multi-detector CT examinations using size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). Console-displayed volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded for a total of 78 paediatric abdominal CT examinations performed in six hospitals. Measurements of the patient diameters were taken from the mid-slice location on the transverse and scout CT images. Size-specific conversion coefficients were used to translate CTDIvol to the SSDE, according AAPM Report 204. For children aged 0–1 y, CTDIvol, SSDEtrans (from transverse images) and SSDEsco (from scout images) were: 12.80 ± 16.10, 14.43 ± 13.22; and 14.37 ± 13.03 mGy; respectively. For children aged 1–5 y, CTDIvol, SSDEtrans and SSDEsco were: 12.11 ± 14.47, 18.8 ± 18.61 and 16.51 ± 13.55 mGy; respectively. The obtained doses are higher than the corresponding diagnostic reference levels. SSDE increase with patient size as results of tube current modulation and is therefore a valuable tool for dose optimisation.


Author(s):  
C. A. Aborisade ◽  
O. C. Famurewa ◽  
F. I. Ibitoye ◽  
F. A. Balogun

Aims: The aim of this research work is to estimate the organ dose distribution and the associated radiation induced cancer risk for some commonly performed Computerized Tomography (CT) examinations in a tertiary medical facility in South Nigeria. Study Design:  The study was designed to estimate the radiological implications of radiation dose that the paediatric patients were exposed to during routine CT examinations. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex, (OAUTHC), Ile-Ife, Nigeria, between August 16,  2011 to August 15 2012. Methodology: Well calibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF-100) were attached to the skin of paediatric patients such as skull, chest, abdomen, and pelvic in the path of the primary X-ray beam to determine radiation exposure during CT examination. The effective dose was calculated from the equivalent dose obtained from OAUTHC, and the cancer risk associated was estimated by multiply age-dependent lifetime cancer mortality risk (per unit dose) with estimated age-dependent doses produced by various CT examinations. Results: Out of 258 paediatric patients scanned the equivalent dose measured for abdominal CT scan ranged from 23.49 - 55. 26 mSv; skull CT scan ranged from 10.07 – 69.94 mSv and chest CT scan ranged from 8.60 – 31.94 mSv. The peak tube voltage (kVp) used range from 80 – 140 while the exposure current-time product (mA) range from 30 – 300.  The abdominal CT scan had the highest cancer risk ranging from digestive 37.5% to lung cancer risk of 0.4%. The risks estimated in this work were higher than the ICRP recommended value. Reducing the millampere-second setting of the equipment for paediatric without significant loss of radiological information will reduce this risk. Conclusion: In this study the estimated cancer risk to paediatric patients undergoing CT is high.  This is in keeping with findings in a previous study thus emphasizing the need to standardize and optimize radiation dose in paediatric patients undergoing CT in Nigeria so as to keep cancer risk at the minimum.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Khatonabadi ◽  
Di Zhang ◽  
Jeffrey Yang ◽  
John J. DeMarco ◽  
Chris C. Cagnon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document