WE-E-201B-06: Obtaining Increased Field-Of-View in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Using the Standard Centered Detector Geometry

2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (6Part7) ◽  
pp. 3442-3443
Author(s):  
S Ngcezu ◽  
A Paidi ◽  
H Shukla ◽  
S Bose ◽  
A Bani-Hashemi ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Kassabji ◽  
Mehrnaz Tahmasbi ◽  
Robert A. Augsburger ◽  
Madhu Nair ◽  
Matthew J. Kesterke ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 691-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Talks ◽  
Karan Jolly ◽  
Hanna Burton ◽  
Hitesh Koria ◽  
Shahzada K. Ahmed

Background Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a fast imaging technique with a substantially lower radiation dosage than conventional multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for sinus imaging. Surgical navigation systems are increasingly being used in endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery, reducing perioperative morbidity. Objective To investigate CBCT as a low-radiation imaging modality for use in surgical navigation. Methods The required field of view was measured from the tip of the nose to the posterior clinoid process anteroposteriorly and the nasolabial angle to the roof of the frontal sinus superoinferiorly on 50 consecutive MDCT scans (male = 25; age = 17–85 years). A phantom head was manufactured by 3-dimensional printing and imaged using 3 CBCT scanners (Carestream, J Morita, and NewTom), a conventional MDCT scanner (Siemens), and highly accurate laser scanner (FARO). The phantom head was registered to 3 surgical navigation systems (Brainlab, Stryker, and Medtronic) using scans from each system. Results The required field of view (mean ± standard deviation) was measured as 107 ± 7.6 mm anteroposteriorly and 90.3 ± 9.6 mm superoinferiorly. Image error deviations from the laser scan (median ± interquartile range) were comparable for MDCT (0.19 ± 0.09 mm) and CBCT (CBCT 1: 0.15 ± 0.11 mm; CBCT 2: 0.33 ± 0.18 mm; and CBCT 3: 0.13 ± 0.13 mm) scanners. Fiducial registration error and target registration error were also comparable for MDCT- and CBCT-based navigation. Conclusion CBCT is a low-radiation preoperative imaging modality suitable for use in surgical navigation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 1159-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Rodrigues Pinheiro ◽  
William C. Scarfe ◽  
Marcelo Augusto de Oliveira Sales ◽  
Bruno Felipe Gaia ◽  
Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez Cortes ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Coelho Lorenzoni ◽  
Ana Maria Bolognese ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Fabio Ribeiro Guedes ◽  
Eduardo Franzotti Sant’Anna

Introduction. The aim of this study was to discuss the radiation doses associated with plain radiographs, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and conventional computed tomography (CT) in dentistry, with a special focus on orthodontics.Methods. A systematic search for articles was realized by MEDLINE from 1997–March 2011.Results. Twenty-seven articles met the established criteria. The data of these papers were grouped in a table and discussed.Conclusions. Increases in kV, mA, exposure time, and field of view (FOV) increase the radiation dose. The dose for CT is greater than other modalities. When the full-mouth series (FMX) is performed with round collimation, the orthodontic radiographs transmit higher dose than most of the large FOV CBCT, but it can be reduced if used rectangular collimation, showing lower effective dose than large FOV CBCT. Despite the image quality, the CBCT does not replace the FMX. In addition to the radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic needs should be strongly taken into account.


Author(s):  
Carla Alves Pinto ◽  
Gabriela Franco da Rosa Caetano ◽  
Marcos Ely A Andrade ◽  
Francine Kull Panzarella ◽  
José Luiz Cintra Junqueira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document