SU-E-I-14: Evaluation of Image Quality Parameters of Small and Full Field of View Cone Beam Computed Tomography Dental Imaging Systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (6Part4) ◽  
pp. 3627-3628
Author(s):  
E Hoffmann ◽  
A Marques da Silva ◽  
D Azevedo ◽  
J Borges
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Imaging Systems ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Dental Imaging

scholarly journals Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Radiographs in Dentistry: Aspects Related to Radiation Dose

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Coelho Lorenzoni ◽  
Ana Maria Bolognese ◽  
Daniela Gamba Garib ◽  
Fabio Ribeiro Guedes ◽  
Eduardo Franzotti Sant’Anna
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Lower Effective Dose ◽  
Plain Radiographs

Introduction. The aim of this study was to discuss the radiation doses associated with plain radiographs, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and conventional computed tomography (CT) in dentistry, with a special focus on orthodontics.Methods. A systematic search for articles was realized by MEDLINE from 1997–March 2011.Results. Twenty-seven articles met the established criteria. The data of these papers were grouped in a table and discussed.Conclusions. Increases in kV, mA, exposure time, and field of view (FOV) increase the radiation dose. The dose for CT is greater than other modalities. When the full-mouth series (FMX) is performed with round collimation, the orthodontic radiographs transmit higher dose than most of the large FOV CBCT, but it can be reduced if used rectangular collimation, showing lower effective dose than large FOV CBCT. Despite the image quality, the CBCT does not replace the FMX. In addition to the radiation dose, image quality and diagnostic needs should be strongly taken into account.

scholarly journals A technical note on intra-arterial cone-beam computed tomography for the evaluation of flow-diverter stents: Image quality differences between diluted and non-diluted contrast medium

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-169
Author(s):  
Naci Kocer ◽  
Sedat G Kandemirli ◽  
Daniel Ruijters ◽  
Michalis Mantatzis ◽  
Osman Kizilkilic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Contrast Medium ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Vessel Wall ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Gray Scale ◽  
Stent Deployment ◽  
Contrast Technique

Background Design of flow-diverter stents for flexibility, tractability, and low profile limits their radiopacity on conventional digital subtraction angiography. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers higher spatial resolution for the evaluation of flow-diverter stents. However, CBCT requires optimal dilution and timing of contrast medium for simultaneous visualization of the stent, arterial lumen, and vessel wall. There are only limited data on the effects of different contrast dilutions on CBCT image quality in neurointerventional applications. Materials and methods In our institution, intra-arterial CBCTs were acquired during stent deployment and at follow-ups with 10% diluted contrast. We had recently started acquiring intra-arterial CBCTs with non-diluted contrast. Retrospective analysis of our flow-diverter data identified eight cases with different aneurysm locations who had intra-arterial CBCT with 10% diluted contrast immediately after flow-diverter stent deployment and with non-diluted contrast technique during follow-ups. For each case, the image quality between diluted and non-diluted contrast techniques was compared qualitatively by assessing stent visualization and quantitatively by plotting gray-scale intensity values along the vessel lumen. Results In two sets of CBCT images per each case, there was no substantial difference between diluted and non-diluted CBTC techniques for the evaluation of stent architecture and lumen opacification. Gray-scale intensity values perpendicular to the lumen revealed similar intensity values along the neighboring parenchyma, vessel wall, and lumen for the two different contrast techniques. Conclusion Intra-arterial CBCT angiography can be performed without contrast dilution and still achieve adequate image quality in certain cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter. The non-diluted contrast technique avoids the time loss during preparation of diluted contrast and installation of diluted contrast to the injector in angiography suites with a single power injector.

Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Artifacts Produced by Metal Objects Located Within and Outside the Field of View

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Kassabji ◽  
Mehrnaz Tahmasbi ◽  
Robert A. Augsburger ◽  
Madhu Nair ◽  
Matthew J. Kesterke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Cone Beam

Feasibility study of a s ynchronized-mo ving-g rid (SMOG) system to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 5099-5110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Ren ◽  
Fang-Fang Yin ◽  
Indrin J. Chetty ◽  
David A. Jaffray ◽  
Jian-Yue Jin
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Improve Image Quality

Influence of cone-beam computed tomography milliamperage settings on image quality of the mandibular third molar region

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico Sampaio Neves ◽  
Thaís de Camargo Souza ◽  
Sérgio Lins de-Azevedo-Vaz ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Flores Campos ◽  
Frab Norberto Bóscolo
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Image Quality ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Molar Region

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Allows Accurate Registration to Surgical Navigation Systems: A Multidevice Phantom Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 691-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Talks ◽  
Karan Jolly ◽  
Hanna Burton ◽  
Hitesh Koria ◽  
Shahzada K. Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Surgical Navigation ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Field Of View ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Navigation Systems ◽  
Registration Error ◽  
Surgical Navigation Systems ◽  
Phantom Head

Background Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a fast imaging technique with a substantially lower radiation dosage than conventional multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for sinus imaging. Surgical navigation systems are increasingly being used in endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery, reducing perioperative morbidity. Objective To investigate CBCT as a low-radiation imaging modality for use in surgical navigation. Methods The required field of view was measured from the tip of the nose to the posterior clinoid process anteroposteriorly and the nasolabial angle to the roof of the frontal sinus superoinferiorly on 50 consecutive MDCT scans (male = 25; age = 17–85 years). A phantom head was manufactured by 3-dimensional printing and imaged using 3 CBCT scanners (Carestream, J Morita, and NewTom), a conventional MDCT scanner (Siemens), and highly accurate laser scanner (FARO). The phantom head was registered to 3 surgical navigation systems (Brainlab, Stryker, and Medtronic) using scans from each system. Results The required field of view (mean ± standard deviation) was measured as 107 ± 7.6 mm anteroposteriorly and 90.3 ± 9.6 mm superoinferiorly. Image error deviations from the laser scan (median ± interquartile range) were comparable for MDCT (0.19 ± 0.09 mm) and CBCT (CBCT 1: 0.15 ± 0.11 mm; CBCT 2: 0.33 ± 0.18 mm; and CBCT 3: 0.13 ± 0.13 mm) scanners. Fiducial registration error and target registration error were also comparable for MDCT- and CBCT-based navigation. Conclusion CBCT is a low-radiation preoperative imaging modality suitable for use in surgical navigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document