SU-FF-T-260: A Higher Accuracy Electron Beam Model Based On Large Field Measurements

2005 ◽  
Vol 32 (6Part10) ◽  
pp. 2010-2010
Author(s):  
B Faddegon
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Beam Model ◽  
Model Based

scholarly journals Commissioning Measurements of Electron Beam Using Montecarlo Algorithm on Truebeam STx® and Compariaon with Clinac iX Linear Accelerator

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 01041
Author(s):  
Kamal Saidi ◽  
Redouane El Baydaoui ◽  
Hanae El Gouach ◽  
Othmane Kaanouch ◽  
Mohamed Reda Mesradi
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Measured Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Water Phantom ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
International University ◽  
The Absolute

TrueBeam STx latest generation linear accelerators (linacs) installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. The aim of this is to present and compare the result of the Electron commissioning measurement on TrueBeam Stx and clinac iX installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. A compariaon of eMC calculations and measurements for TrueBeam Stx were evaluated. Dosimetric parameters are systematically measured using a large water phantom 3D scanning system MP3 Water Phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany). The data of the electron beams commissioning including depth dose curves for each applicator, depth dose curves without applicator and the profile in air for a large field size 40x 40cm2, and the Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) for each applicator. All the data were examined and compared for five electron beams (E6MeV, E9MeV, E12MeV, E16MeV and E20MeV) of Varian’s TrueBeam STx and Clinac iX machines. A comparison, between measurement PDDs and calculated by the Eclipse electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm were performed to validate Truebeam Stx commissioning. All this measurements were performed with a Roos and Markus plane parallel chamber. Our measured data indicated that electron beam PDDs from the TrueBeam Stx machine are well matched to those from our Varian Clinac iX machine. Significant differences between TrueBeam and Clinac iX were found in in‐air profiles and open field output. Maximum depth dose for the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX for the following energies (6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV) are respectively (1.15; 1.89; 2.6; 3.1; and 2.35) and (1.24; 1.95; 2.70; 2.99 and 2.4cm). For the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX the quality index R50 for applicator 15x15 cm2 are in the tolerance intervals. Surface dose increases by increasing energy for both machines. The Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) calibrated for both machine in Dmax at 1cGy/MU for the reference field size cone 15x15 cm2. Bremsstrahlung tail Rp per energy levels as follows for the TrueBeam Stx : 6 MeV – 2.85 cm, 9 MeV – 4.28 cm, 12 MeV – 5.97 cm, 16 MeV – 7.88 cm and 20 MeV – 9.86 cm. and for the Clinac iX : 6 MeV – 2.86 cm, 9 MeV – 4.32 cm, 12 MeV – 5.96 cm, 16 MeV – 7.93 cm and 20 MeV – 10.08 cm. A good agreement between modeled and measured data is observed.

Mathematical Models for Model-Based Control in Offshore Pipelay Operations

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gullik A. Jensen ◽  
Thor I. Fossen
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Dynamic Models ◽  
Controller Design ◽  
Computational Time ◽  
Beam Model ◽  
Time Dynamic ◽  
Model Based ◽  
On Line ◽  
Stability And Accuracy ◽  
Control Application

This paper considers mathematical models for model-based controller design in offshore pipelay operations. Three classes of models for control design are discussed, real-world models suitable for controller design verification, controller and observer models which are used on-line in the control system implementation. The control application place requirements on the model with respect to the computational time, dynamic behavior, stability and accuracy. Models such as the beam model, two catenary models, as well as general finite element (FE) models obtained from computer programs were not able to meet all of the requirements, and two recent dynamic models designed for control are presented, which bridge the gap between the simple analytical and more complex FE models. For completeness, modeling of the pipelay vessel, stinger and roller interaction, soil and seabed interaction and environmental loads are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document