Scotopic contrast sensitivity test: a rapid method for evaluating foveal functions

Author(s):  
Yossie Mandel ◽  
Uri Polat ◽  
Ariel Bar ◽  
Oren Yehezkel ◽  
Mordechai Rosner ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalita Gupta ◽  
Michael Waisbourd ◽  
Carina T. Sanvicente ◽  
Michael Hsieh ◽  
Sheryl S. Wizov ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
L KRIAUCIUNIENE ◽  
G SLATKEVICIENE ◽  
R LIUTKEVICIENE ◽  
D ZALIUNIENE ◽  
G BERNOTAS ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Richman ◽  
Camila Zangalli ◽  
Lan Lu ◽  
Sheryl S Wizov ◽  
Eric Spaeth ◽  
...  

Retina ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 1465-1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno M. Faria ◽  
Fulya Duman ◽  
Cindy X. Zheng ◽  
Michael Waisbourd ◽  
Lalita Gupta ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-175
Author(s):  
Rahim Barbareza ◽  
Margaret Woodhouse ◽  
Kola Oduwaiye

1965 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 829-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Mahony ◽  
P. Chadwick

A rapid antibiotic sensitivity test is described in which the criterion of sensitivity was the inhibition of microcolony formation on the surface of agar plates containing antibiotic. Results of the tests were available 4 hours after inoculation of the plates. Comparison between 4-hour microcolony readings and confirmatory observations after 20 hours incubation showed a discrepancy rate of 2.72%. The results obtained by the microcolony method showed a good correlation with those given by the paper disc method. Correlation with the tube dilution method was not so good, but there may be valid reasons for this. The merits and demerits of the microcolony method are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document