Airport databases for 3D synthetic-vision flight-guidance displays: database design, quality assessment, and data generation

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Friedrich ◽  
Helmut Raabe ◽  
Jens Schiefele ◽  
Kai Uwe Doerr
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Database Design ◽  
Data Generation ◽  
Design Quality ◽  
Synthetic Vision ◽  
Flight Guidance

Design quality assessment of campus facilities through post occupancy evaluation

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A. Hassanain ◽  
Muizz O. Sanni-Anibire ◽  
Abubakar Sadiq Mahmoud
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Indoor Environment ◽  
Residential Buildings ◽  
University Campus ◽  
Design Quality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Post Occupancy Evaluation ◽  
Air Ventilation ◽  
Academic Buildings ◽  
Surrounding Areas

PurposeThis study aims to present the design quality assessment of facilities on a university campus in Saudi Arabia.Design/methodology/approachForty-nine standardized design quality indicators (DQIs) have been adopted for the study. These were classified into relevant categories including: “Indoor Environment, Safety and Maintenance,” “Furniture, Utilities and Spaces” and “Privacy, Appearance and Surrounding Areas.” A web-based survey was used to obtain responses from 207 respondents. The survey was designed based on a Likert scale of satisfaction and was analyzed to obtain the satisfaction indices (SI) as well as Design Quality Scores (DQS).FindingsOccupants were dissatisfied the “level of noise generated from within the space,” “amount of natural light from daylighting systems” and “ease of control of air ventilation systems” among others. The DQS revealed that residential buildings had the highest design quality in terms of “Indoor Environment, Safety, and Maintenance” and “Privacy, Appearance and Surrounding Areas.” Administrative buildings had the best design quality in terms of “furniture, utilities and spaces.” Academic buildings had the lowest design quality in terms of “Indoor Environment, Safety and Maintenance” and “Privacy, Appearance and Surrounding Areas.”Originality/valueUltimately, the study demonstrated how the adoption of a standard set of DQIs could facilitate the standardization of design quality evaluation in the property sector as well as identify best practices through comparison and benchmarking.

Design Quality Assessment

Sustainaspeak ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 85-85
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Design Quality

Chip Design Process Optimization Based on Design Quality Assessment

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Häusler ◽  
Jana Blaschke ◽  
Christian Sebeke ◽  
Wolfgang Rosenstiel ◽  
Axel Hahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Process Optimization ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Design Quality ◽  
Chip Design

scholarly journals QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF PANSHARPENED RASAT AND LANDSAT-8 IMAGES USING SYNTHETIC SENTINEL-2 PANCHROMATIC IMAGE

2021 ◽  
Vol XLVI-4/W5-2021 ◽  
pp. 231-234
Author(s):  
M. A. Günen
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Image Quality Assessment ◽  
Reference Image ◽  
Landsat 8 ◽  
Data Generation ◽  
Gis Applications ◽  
Assessment Metrics ◽  
Sentinel 2

Abstract. Technical and physical limitations often do not allow images to be acquired with high spatial and spectral resolution. Pansharpened images obtained by fusing high spatial resolution panchromatic images and multi-spectral images are widely used in GIS applications. In this study, it is aimed to increase the spatial resolution of the RASAT and Landsat-8 multispectral satellite images with synthetic Sentinel-2 panchromatic data. Six different pansharpening methods were used to test the success of the synthetic panchromatic data generation method using dataset with two different land use/land cover properties. Seven full reference image quality assessment metrics and two referenceless image quality assessment metrics were used to perform quantitative comparison.

Assessing Data Quality: An Approach and An Application

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Kelly McMann ◽  
Daniel Pemstein ◽  
Brigitte Seim ◽  
Jan Teorell ◽  
Staffan Lindberg
Keyword(s):  
Data Quality ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Generation Process ◽  
Data Generation ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Data Quality Assessment ◽  
Assessment Approach

Abstract Political scientists routinely face the challenge of assessing the quality (validity and reliability) of measures in order to use them in substantive research. While stand-alone assessment tools exist, researchers rarely combine them comprehensively. Further, while a large literature informs data producers, data consumers lack guidance on how to assess existing measures for use in substantive research. We delineate a three-component practical approach to data quality assessment that integrates complementary multimethod tools to assess: (1) content validity; (2) the validity and reliability of the data generation process; and (3) convergent validity. We apply our quality assessment approach to the corruption measures from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) project, both illustrating our rubric and unearthing several quality advantages and disadvantages of the V-Dem measures, compared to other existing measures of corruption.

Quality assessment of a campus medical facility: a users' perspective approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 585-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A. Hassanain ◽  
Ammar H. A. Dehwah ◽  
Muizz O. Sanni-Anibire ◽  
Wahhaj Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Focus Group ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Quality Of Healthcare ◽  
Medical Facility ◽  
Design Quality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Healthcare Facilities

PurposeThis study aims to evaluate the quality of an on-campus medical facility at a leading university.Design/methodology/approachPublished literature was consulted to review knowledge areas on the usability and quality performance requirements of healthcare facilities. Quality indicators were, thus, developed from the extant literature and verified by a walkthrough of a case study medical facility. Then, a quality assessment survey was developed and administered to obtain feedback from users of the medical facility. Additionally, a focus group meeting was conducted to obtain more qualitative feedback on the issues identified through the questionnaire survey.FindingsThe results show that users were generally satisfied with the identified evaluation categories, indicating moderate quality. Potential quality issues related to the exterior and interior finishes, furniture and the indoor air were noted through focus group meetings. The study proposed a number of recommendations to enhance the design quality of the medical center.Originality/valueThe importance of this study is evident in the fact that the quality of healthcare facilities has a direct link to the performance and overall well-being of its intended users, as well as the overall success of its host organization. The study demonstrates the value of users' feedback on the quality of a built facility. It re-emphasizes the point that buildings can only be judged to be of high quality if the users' are highly satisfied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document