Multispectral edge detection using the two-dimensional self-organizing map

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pekka J. Toivanen ◽  
Jarkko Ansamaki ◽  
S. Leppajarvi ◽  
Jussi P. S. Parkkinen
2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 2987-2994 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J Toivanen ◽  
J Ansamäki ◽  
J.P.S Parkkinen ◽  
J Mielikäinen

Author(s):  
Pekka J. Toivanen ◽  
J. Ansamäki ◽  
S. Leppäjärvi ◽  
J. Parkkinen

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott C. Sheridan ◽  
Cameron C. Lee

Self-organizing maps (SOMs) are a relative newcomer to synoptic climatology; the method itself has only been utilized in the field for around a decade. In this article, we review the major developments and climatological applications of SOMs in the literature. The SOM can be used in synoptic climatological analysis in a manner similar to most other clustering methods. However, as the results from a SOM are generally represented by a two-dimensional array of cluster types that ‘self-organize’, the synoptic categories in the array effectively represent a continuum of synoptic categorizations, compared with discrete realizations produced through most traditional methods. Thus, a larger number of patterns can be more readily understood, and patterns, as well as transitional nodes between patterns, can be discerned. Perhaps the most intriguing development with SOMs has been the new avenues of visualization; the resultant spatial patterns of any variable can be more readily understood when displayed in a SOM. This improved visualization has led to SOMs becoming an increasingly popular tool in various research with climatological applications from other disciplines as well.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-193
Author(s):  
Adrian Costea

Abstract In this paper we evaluate comparatively the performance of non-banking financial institutions in Romania by the means of unsupervised neural networks in terms of Kohonen’ Self-Organizing Maps algorithm. We create a benchmarking model in the form of a two-dimensional map (a self-organizing map) that can be used to assess visually the performance of non-banking financial institutions based on different performance dimensions, such as capital adequacy, assets’ quality and profitability. We use the following indicators: Equity ratio (Leverage) for the capital adequacy dimension, Loans granted to clients (net value) / total assets (net value) for the assets’ quality dimension and Return on assets (ROA) for the profitability dimension. We have excluded from our analysis the other three dimensions used in evaluating the performance of banks, due to lack of data (for the two qualitative dimensions: quality of ownership and management) and irrelevance with the NFIs’ sector (liquidity). The proposed model is based on the Self-Organising Map algorithm which creates a two-dimensional map (e.g. 6x4 = 24 neurons) from p-dimensional input data. The data were collected for eleven non-banking financial institutions for four years 2007-2010, in total 44 observations. Using the visualization capabilities of the Self-Organising Map model and the trajectories we show the movements of the three non-banking financial institutions with the worst performance: the largest underperformer denoted with X, the second largest underperformer denoted with Y and the third largest underperformer denoted with Z between 2007 and 2010.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document