Measurements of the posterior structures of the human eye in vivo by partial-coherence interferometry using diffractive optics

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Baumgartner ◽  
Bo A. Moeller ◽  
Christoph K. Hitzenberger ◽  
Wolfgang Drexler ◽  
Adolf F. Fercher
Keyword(s):  
Diffractive Optics ◽  
Partial Coherence ◽  
Human Eye ◽  
Partial Coherence Interferometry

Measurement of the anterior structures of the human eye by partial coherence interferometry

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Baumgartner ◽  
Christoph K. Hitzenberger ◽  
Wolfgang Drexler ◽  
Harald Sattmann ◽  
Adolf F. Fercher
Keyword(s):  
Partial Coherence ◽  
Human Eye ◽  
Partial Coherence Interferometry

Application of diffractive optics for axial eye-length measurement using partial coherence interferometry

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo A. Moeller ◽  
G. Rudolph ◽  
A. Klopffleisch ◽  
Karl-Heinz Donnerhacke ◽  
Andreas N. Dorsel
Keyword(s):  
Diffractive Optics ◽  
Length Measurement ◽  
Partial Coherence ◽  
Partial Coherence Interferometry ◽  
Axial Eye Length

scholarly journals Intraocular lens power calculation for plus and minus lenses in high myopia using partial coherence interferometry

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Fuest ◽  
Niklas Plange ◽  
David Kuerten ◽  
Hannah Schellhase ◽  
Babac A. E. Mazinani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Length ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Partial Coherence ◽  
Power Calculation ◽  
Partial Coherence Interferometry ◽  
Intraocular Lens Power Calculation ◽  
Hyperopic Shift ◽  
Lens Power ◽  
Lens Power Calculation

Abstract Purpose We assessed the accuracy of lens power calculation in highly myopic patients implanting plus and minus intraocular lenses (IOL). Methods We included 58 consecutive, myopic eyes with an axial length (AL) > 26.0 mm, undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implantation following biometry using the IOLMaster 500. For lens power calculation, the Haigis formula was used in all cases. For comparison, refraction was back-calculated using the Barrett Universal II (Barrett), Holladay I, Hill-RBF (RBF) and SRK/T formulae. Results The mean axial length was 30.17 ± 2.67 mm. Barrett (80%), Haigis (87%) and RBF (82%) showed comparable numbers of IOLs within 1 diopter (D) of target refraction. Visual acuity (BSCVA) improved (p < 0.001) from 0.60 ± 0.35 to 0.29 ± 0.29 logMAR (> 28-days postsurgery). The median absolute error (MedAE) of Barrett 0.49 D, Haigis 0.38, RBF 0.44 and SRK/T 0.44 did not differ. The MedAE of Haigis was significantly smaller than Holladay (0.75 D; p = 0.01). All median postoperative refractive errors (MedRE) differed significantly with the exception of Haigis to SRK/T (p = 0.6): Barrett − 0.33 D, Haigis 0.25, Holladay 0.63, RBF 0.04 and SRK/T 0.13. Barrett, Haigis, Holladay and RBF showed a tendency for higher MedAEs in their minus compared to plus IOLs, which only reached significance for SRK/T (p = 0.001). Barrett (p < 0.001) and RBF (p = 0.04) showed myopic, SRK/T (p = 002) a hyperopic shift in their minus IOLs. Conclusions In highly myopic patients, the accuracies of Barrett, Haigis and RBF were comparable with a tendency for higher MedAEs in minus IOLs. Barrett and RBF showed myopic, SRK/T a hyperopic shift in their minus IOLs.

scholarly journals In vivo Brillouin optical microscopy of the human eye

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 9197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Scarcelli ◽  
Seok Hyun Yun
Keyword(s):  
Optical Microscopy ◽  
Human Eye
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document