A comparative study of local descriptors for Arabic character recognition on mobile devices

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maroua Tounsi ◽  
Ikram Moalla ◽  
Adel M. Alimi ◽  
Franck Lebourgeois
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Mobile Devices ◽  
Character Recognition ◽  
Local Descriptors

scholarly journals Which OCR toolset is good and why? A comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Jain ◽  
◽  
Dr. Kavita Taneja ◽  
Dr. Harmunish Taneja ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Character Recognition ◽  
Optical Character Recognition ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Real World Applications ◽  
Banking Education ◽  
Active Research ◽  
Active Research Area ◽  
Computational Technology

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) is a very active research area in many challenging fields like pattern recognition, natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, biomedical informatics, machine learning (ML), and artificial intelligence (AI). This computational technology extracts the text in an editable format (MS Word/Excel, text files, etc.) from PDF files, scanned or hand-written documents, images (photographs, advertisements, and alike), etc. for further processing and has been utilized in many real-world applications including banking, education, insurance, finance, healthcare and keyword-based search in documents, etc. Many OCR toolsets are available under various categories, including open-source, proprietary, and online services. This research paper provides a comparative study of various OCR toolsets considering a variety of parameters.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Local Descriptors for Object Category Recognition: SIFT vs HMAX

2007 ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Plinio Moreno ◽  
Manuel J. Marín-Jiménez ◽  
Alexandre Bernardino ◽  
José Santos-Victor ◽  
Nicolás Pérez de la Blanca
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Local Descriptors ◽  
Object Category

Performance Analysis of Open Source Optical Character Recognition

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 4267-4275
Author(s):  
Jagadish Kallimani ◽  
Chandrika Prasad ◽  
D. Keerthana ◽  
Manoj J. Shet ◽  
Prasada Hegde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Error Rate ◽  
Character Recognition ◽  
Optical Character Recognition ◽  
Accurate Result ◽  
Recognition System ◽  
Optical Character ◽  
Recognition Systems

Optical character recognition is the process of conversion of images of text into machine-encoded text electronically or mechanically. The text on image can be handwritten, typed or printed. Some of the examples of image source can be a picture of a document, a scanned document or a text which is superimposed on an image. Most optical character recognition system does not give a 100% accurate result. This project aims at analyzing the error rate of a few open source optical character recognition systems (Boxoft OCR, ABBY, Tesseract, Free Online OCR etc.) on a set of diverse documents and makes a comparative study of the same. By this, we can study which OCR is the best suited for a document.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document