scholarly journals Compressed sensing in photoacoustic tomography in vivo

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 021311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijian Guo ◽  
Changhui Li ◽  
Liang Song ◽  
Lihong V. Wang
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijian Guo ◽  
Changhui Li ◽  
Liang Song ◽  
Lihong V. Wang

Author(s):  
Markus Haltmeier ◽  
Stephan Antholzer ◽  
Johannes Schwab ◽  
Peter Burgholzer ◽  
Johnnes Bauer-Marschallinger

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 16510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Meng ◽  
Lihong V. Wang ◽  
Leslie Ying ◽  
Dong Liang ◽  
Liang Song

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Zhou ◽  
Zhao Li ◽  
Juan Zhou ◽  
Bishnu P. Joshi ◽  
Gaoming Li ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudong Zhang ◽  
Bradley S. Peterson ◽  
Genlin Ji ◽  
Zhengchao Dong

The sampling patterns, cost functions, and reconstruction algorithms play important roles in optimizing compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI). Simple random sampling patterns did not take into account the energy distribution ink-space and resulted in suboptimal reconstruction of MR images. Therefore, a variety of variable density (VD) based samplings patterns had been developed. To further improve it, we propose a novel energy preserving sampling (ePRESS) method. Besides, we improve the cost function by introducing phase correction and region of support matrix, and we propose iterative thresholding algorithm (ITA) to solve the improved cost function. We evaluate the proposed ePRESS sampling method, improved cost function, and ITA reconstruction algorithm by 2D digital phantom and 2Din vivoMR brains of healthy volunteers. These assessments demonstrate that the proposed ePRESS method performs better than VD, POWER, and BKO; the improved cost function can achieve better reconstruction quality than conventional cost function; and the ITA is faster than SISTA and is competitive with FISTA in terms of computation time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document