scholarly journals Discussion Paper: The Canberra Meeting: An initiative for building research capacity in health professions education

Author(s):  
Jonathan S Foo ◽  
Anique Atherley ◽  
Julie Ash ◽  
Wendy Hu

Introduction: There are few dedicated health professions education research centres in Australia and New Zealand. As a result, researchers, especially novices, can often feel isolated. In this discussion paper, we introduce The Canberra Meeting—an initiative for building research capacity in health professions education by developing a community of practice through an annual meeting. In this meeting, novice researchers present on significant problems or questions arising from their research, known as a dilemma presentation, and facilitate discussion with an audience of peer PhD students, earlycareer researchers and senior researchers. The meeting aims to provide an opportunity to expand professional networks, exchange ideas and build knowledge.Innovation: A half-day pilot meeting was held in Canberra prior to the 2019 ANZAHPE conference. The meeting was designed for, and planned by, novice researchers. There were 37 attendees, including 13 who self-identified as novice researchers. Three half-hour dilemma sessions were held, comprised of 10 minutes of presentation time followed by 20 minutes of discussion.Evaluation and outcomes: Feedback on the pilot was sought through prompted group discussions. The following guiding principles were developed, including that the initiative should be 1) inclusive to all health professions and seek to reach isolated researchers; 2) accessible, by providing equal opportunity of access; 3) constructive, such that participants feel safe to present and engage in discussions; and 4) sustainable, such that the community of practice continues despite changes in individual membership.What’s next: Planning is currently underway for a meeting prior to the next ANZAHPE conference. The event will be publicly advertised.

Diagnosis ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Olson ◽  
Joseph Rencic ◽  
Karen Cosby ◽  
Diana Rusz ◽  
Frank Papa ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Given an unacceptably high incidence of diagnostic errors, we sought to identify the key competencies that should be considered for inclusion in health professions education programs to improve the quality and safety of diagnosis in clinical practice. Methods An interprofessional group reviewed existing competency expectations for multiple health professions, and conducted a search that explored quality, safety, and competency in diagnosis. An iterative series of group discussions and concept prioritization was used to derive a final set of competencies. Results Twelve competencies were identified: Six of these are individual competencies: The first four (#1–#4) focus on acquiring the key information needed for diagnosis and formulating an appropriate, prioritized differential diagnosis; individual competency #5 is taking advantage of second opinions, decision support, and checklists; and #6 is using reflection and critical thinking to improve diagnostic performance. Three competencies focus on teamwork: Involving the patient and family (#1) and all relevant health professionals (#2) in the diagnostic process; and (#3) ensuring safe transitions of care and handoffs, and “closing the loop” on test result communication. The final three competencies emphasize system-related aspects of care: (#1) Understanding how human-factor elements influence the diagnostic process; (#2) developing a supportive culture; and (#3) reporting and disclosing diagnostic errors that are recognized, and learning from both successful diagnosis and from diagnostic errors. Conclusions These newly defined competencies are relevant to all health professions education programs and should be incorporated into educational programs.


Author(s):  
Caroline Pickstone ◽  
Susan Nancarrow ◽  
Jo Cooke ◽  
Wesley Vernon ◽  
Gail Mountain ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emília Virgínia Noormahomed ◽  
Ana Olga Mocumbi ◽  
Mamudo Ismail ◽  
Carla Carrilho ◽  
Sam Patel ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
David Briggs

In this issue we start with the editorial and then present a research article from Matus, Wenke and Mickan that has an objective the development a practical toolkit of evidence-informed strategies for building research capacity in Allied Health. The focus on allied health continues with a further research article from McKeever and Brown who ask the question ‘What are the client, organisational and employee – related outcomes of high-quality leadership in the Allied Health Professions?’ The authors undertook a scoping review around these aspects in Allied health.


2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter R Frontera ◽  
Marcus J Fuhrer ◽  
Alan M Jette ◽  
Leighton Chan ◽  
Rory A Cooper ◽  
...  

The general objective of the Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were: (1) researchers, (2) research environment, infrastructure, and culture, (3) funding, (4) partnerships, and (5) metrics. The [approximately] 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small-group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multi-organizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this report.


MedEdPublish ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Richard Hays ◽  
Trevor Gibbs ◽  
Julie Hunt ◽  
Barbara Jennings ◽  
Ken Masters

MedEdPublish has come a long way since it was launched in 2016 by AMEE as an independent academic e-journal that supports scholarship in health professions education. Beginning as a relatively small, in-house publication on a web platform adapted for the purpose, we invited members of our community of practice to submit articles on any topic in health professions education, and encouraged a wide range of article types. All articles were published so long as they met editing criteria and where within scope. Reviews were welcomed from both members of our Review panel and the general readership, all published openly with contributors identified. Many articles attracted several reviews, responses and comments, creating interactive discussion threads that provided learning opportunities for all. The outcome surpassed our expectations, with over 500 articles submitted during 2020, beyond the capacity of our editing team and platform to achieve our promise of rapid publishing. We have now moved to a much larger and powerful web platform, developed by F1000 Research and within the Taylor and Francis stable, the home of AMEE’s other journal, Medical Teacher. Most of our innovations are supported by the new platform and there is scope for further developments. We look forward to an exciting new phase of innovation, powered by the F1000 platform.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document