ORNL Evaluation of Safety Cases for Two Belgian Reactor Pressure Vessels Containing Quasi-Laminar Defects

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilda B. Klasky ◽  
B. Richard Bass ◽  
Terry L. Dickson ◽  
Sarma B. Gorti ◽  
Randy K. Nanstad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Safety Margins ◽  
Safety Cases ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) performed a detailed technical review of the 2015 Electrabel (EBL) Safety Cases prepared for the Belgium reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) at Doel 3 and Tihange 2 (D3/T2). The Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) in Belgium commissioned ORNL to provide a thorough assessment of the existing safety margins against cracking of the RPVs due to the presence of almost laminar flaws found in each RPV. Initial efforts focused on surveying relevant literature that provided necessary background knowledge on the issues related to the quasi-laminar flaws observed in D3/T2 reactors. Next, ORNL proceeded to develop an independent quantitative assessment of the entire flaw population in the two Belgian reactors according to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Appendix G, “Fracture Toughness Criteria for Protection Against Failure,” New York (both 1992 and 2004 versions). That screening assessment of the EBL-characterized flaws in D3/T2 used ORNL tools, methodologies, and the ASME Code Case N-848, “Alternative Characterization Rules for Quasi-Laminar Flaws”. Results and conclusions derived from comparisons of the ORNL flaw acceptance assessments of D3/T2 with those from the 2015 EBL Safety Cases are presented in the paper. The ORNL screening analyses identified fewer flaws than EBL that were not compliant with the ASME Section XI (1992) criterion; the EBL criterion imposed additional conservatisms not included in ASME Section XI. Furthermore, ORNL’s application of the updated ASME Section XI (2004) criterion produced only four non-compliant flaws, all due to design-basis loss-of-coolant loading transients. Among the latter, only one flaw remained non-compliant when analyzed using the warm-prestress (WPS) cleavage fracture model typically applied in USA flaw assessments. ORNL’s independent refined analysis of that flaw (#1660, which was also non-compliant in the EBL screening assessments) rendered it compliant when modeled as a more realistic individual quasi-laminar flaw using a 3-dimensional XFEM (eXtended Finite Element Method) approach available in the ABAQUS© finite element code. Taken as a whole, the ORNL-specific results and conclusions confirmed the structural integrity of Doel 3 and Tihange 2 under all design transients with ample margin in the presence of the 16,196 detected flaws.

NESC-VII: Fracture Mechanics Analyses of WPS Experiments on Large-Scale Cruciform Specimen

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengjun Yin ◽  
Paul T. Williams ◽  
B. Richard Bass
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Cooperative Action ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Feasibility Test ◽  
Reactor Pressure

This paper describes numerical analyses performed to simulate warm pre-stress (WPS) experiments conducted with large-scale cruciform specimens within the Network for Evaluation of Structural Components (NESC-VII) project. NESC-VII is a European cooperative action in support of WPS application in reactor pressure vessel (RPV) integrity assessment. The project aims in evaluation of the influence of WPS when assessing the structural integrity of RPVs. Advanced fracture mechanics models will be developed and performed to validate experiments concerning the effect of different WPS scenarios on RPV components. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), USA contributes to the Work Package-2 (Analyses of WPS experiments) within the NESC-VII network. A series of WPS type experiments on large-scale cruciform specimens have been conducted at CEA Saclay, France, within the framework of NESC VII project. This paper first describes NESC-VII feasibility test analyses conducted at ORNL. Very good agreement was achieved between AREVA NP SAS and ORNL. Further analyses were conducted to evaluate the NESC-VII WPS tests conducted under Load-Cool-Transient-Fracture (LCTF) and Load-Cool-Fracture (LCF) conditions. This objective of this work is to provide a definitive quantification of WPS effects when assessing the structural integrity of reactor pressure vessels. This information will be utilized to further validate, refine, and improve the WPS models that are being used in probabilistic fracture mechanics computer codes now in use by the NRC staff in their effort to develop risk-informed updates to Title 10 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix G.

Review of Proposed Methodology for Risk-Informed Relaxation to ASME Section XI: Appendix G

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry Dickson ◽  
Eric Focht ◽  
Mark Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The current regulations, as set forth by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to insure that light-water nuclear reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) maintain their structural integrity when subjected to planned normal reactor startup (heat-up) and shut-down (cool-down) transients are specified in Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50, which incorporates by reference Appendix G to Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code. The technical basis for these regulations are now recognized by the technical community as being conservative and some plants are finding it increasingly difficult to comply with the current regulations. Consequently, the nuclear industry has developed, and submitted to the ASME Code for approval, an alternative risk-informed methodology that reduces the conservatism and is consistent with the methods previously used to develop a risk-informed revision to the regulations for accidental transients such as pressurized thermal shock (PTS). The objective of the alternative methodology is to provide a relaxation to the current regulations which will provide more operational flexibility, particularly for reactor pressure vessels with relatively high irradiation levels and radiation sensitive materials, while continuing to provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection to public health and safety. The NRC and its contractor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have recently performed an independent review of the industry proposed methodology. The NRC / ORNL review consisted of performing probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) analyses for a matrix of cool-down and heat-up rates, permutated over various reactor geometries and characteristics, each at multiple levels of embrittlement, including 60 effective full power years (EFPY) and beyond, for various postulated flaw characterizations. The objective of this review is to quantify the risk of a reactor vessel experiencing non-ductile fracture, and possible subsequent failure, over a wide range of normal transient conditions, when the maximum allowable thermal-hydraulic boundary conditions, derived from both the current ASME code and the industry proposed methodology, are imposed on the inner surface of the reactor vessel. This paper discusses the results of the NRC/ORNL review of the industry proposal including the matrices of PFM analyses, results, insights, and conclusions derived from these analyses.

Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Evaluations That Consider Nozzles in the Extended Beltline Region of Reactor Pressure Vessels

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L. Stevens ◽  
Mark T. Kirk ◽  
Terry Dickson
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Computer Code ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Stress Concentrations ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Regulatory Issue ◽  
Reactor Pressure

For many years, ASME Section XI committees have discussed the assessment of nozzle penetrations in various flaw evaluations for reactor pressure vessels (RPVs). As summarized in Reference [1], linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) solutions for nozzle penetrations have been in use since the 1970s. In 2013, one of these solutions was adopted into ASME Code, Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix G (ASME App. G) [2] for use in developing RPV pressure-temperature (P-T) operating limits. That change to ASME App. G was based on compilation of past work [3] and additional evaluations of fracture driving force [4][5]. To establish the P-T limits on RPV operation, consideration should be given to both the RPV shell material with the highest reference temperature as well as regions of the RPV (e.g., nozzles, flange) that contain structural discontinuities. In October 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) highlighted these requirements in Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2014-11 [6]. Probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) analyses performed to support pressurized thermal shock (PTS) evaluations using the Fracture Analysis Vessels Oak Ridge (FAVOR) computer code [7] currently evaluate only the RPV beltline shell regions. These evaluations are based on the assumption that the PFM results are controlled by the higher embrittlement characteristic of the shell region rather than the stress concentration characteristic of the nozzle, which does not experience nearly the embrittlement of the shell due to its greater distance from the core. To evaluate this assumption, the NRC and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) performed PFM analyses to quantify the effect of these stress concentrations on the results of the RPV PFM analyses. This paper summarizes the methods and evaluates the results of these analyses.

Material Properties of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shells Affected by Hydrogen Flaking

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Gérard ◽  
Michel De Smet ◽  
Rachid Chaouadi
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Material Properties ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Operating Cycle ◽  
Safety Case ◽  
Safety Cases ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Reactor Pressure ◽  
Trend Curve

During the summer outages of 2012, large numbers of nearly-laminar indications were found in the core shells of the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 reactor pressure vessels (RPV). As a consequence, both units remained in cold shutdown with their core unloaded. A series of examinations, tests and inspections were performed leading to the conclusion that the indications are hydrogen flakes and that they do not affect the structural integrity of the RPV, regardless of the operating mode, transient or accident condition. All this was documented in the Safety Case reports issued in December 2012 and in the Safety Case Addenda issued in April 2013 [1]. Based on those reports, the Belgian Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) authorized the restart of both units which went back on-line in June 2013. A key input required for this Safety Case was the definition of the appropriate material properties, in particular fracture toughness, for the RPV shells affected by hydrogen flakes. A material testing program on non-irradiated materials evaluated aspects like the possible effects of macro-segregations and local segregations (ghost lines) and of specimen orientation on the fracture toughness. The irradiation embrittlement sensitivity of the zone of macro-segregation in which the flakes are located was evaluated on the basis of the maximum enrichment in Cu, P and Ni in macro-segregations based on literature data. This was the basis of the trend curve of RTNDT evolution vs. fluence used in the Safety Cases submitted in 2012–2013. The restart authorization in 2013 was accompanied by a number of “mid-term” requirements, to be completed during the first operating cycle after the restart. One of these requirements was the mechanical testing of irradiated specimens containing hydrogen flakes, in order to confirm the conservativeness of the RTNDT trend curve used for the structural integrity analyses. After a first irradiation campaign of a material containing hydrogen flakes in the BR2 reactor of the Belgian Nuclear Research Center SCK.CEN, atypical results were obtained and the utility decided to shut down the units in March 2014. Detailed investigations involving three additional irradiation campaigns in BR2 including other reference materials, among which another material affected by hydrogen flakes, were performed in order to characterize this atypical behaviour and to derive a new conservative RTNDT trend curve. The resulting trend curve was accepted by the FANC and was used in the 2015 Safety Cases [1]. An overview of the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 safety cases is given in [6]. The paper summarizes the results of the material investigations on non-irradiated and irradiated materials and the process leading to the definition of this conservative RTNDT trend curve.

An Improved Method for Postulating Fabrication Flaws in Reactor Pressure Vessels for Structural Integrity Evaluation

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Simonen ◽  
T. L. Dickson
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Inner Surface ◽  
Reactor Pressure

This paper presents an improved model for postulating fabrication flaws in reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) and for the treatment of measured flaw data by probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) codes that are used for structural integrity evaluations. The model used to develop the current pressurized thermal shock (PTS) regulations conservatively postulated that all fabrication flaws were inner-surface breaking flaws. To reduce conservatisms and uncertainties in flaw-related inputs, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) has supported research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) that has resulted in data on fabrication flaws from non-destructive and destructive examinations of actual RPV material. Statistical distributions have been developed to characterize the number and sizes of flaws in the various material regions of a vessel. The regions include the main seam welds, repair welds, base metal of plates and forgings, and the cladding that is applied to the inner surface of the vessel. Flaws are also characterized as being located within the interior of these regions or along the weld fusion lines that join the regions. Flaws are taken that occur at random locations relative to the embrittled inner region of the vessel. The probabilistic fracture mechanics model associates each of the simulated flaw types with the fracture properties of the region being addressed.

Mechanistic Insights Into Risk-Informed Revision of ASME Section XI–Appendix G

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry Dickson ◽  
Mark Kirk ◽  
Eric Focht
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Health And Safety ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Operating Life ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Asme Code

The current regulations, as set forth by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to insure that light-water nuclear reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) maintain their structural integrity, throughout their operating life, when subjected to planned normal reactor startup (heat-up) and shutdown (cool-down) transients are specified in Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 50, which incorporates by reference Appendix G to Section XI of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code. The technical basis for these regulations are generally considered to be conservative and some plants are finding it operationally difficult to heat-up and cool-down within the accepted limits. Consequently, the nuclear industry has developed, and submitted to the ASME Code for approval, an alternative risk-informed methodology that reduces the conservatism and is consistent with methods previously used to develop a risk-informed revision to the regulations for accidental transients such as pressurized thermal shock (PTS). The objective of the alternative methodology is to increase operational flexibility while continuing to provide reasonable assurance of adequate protection to public health and safety. The NRC and its contractor at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) are reviewing the industry proposed risk-informed methodology. Previous results of this review, have been reported at PVP, and a NRC report summarizing all results is currently in preparation. The objective of this paper is to discuss and illustrate mechanistic insights into trends shown previously associated with normal cool-down.

Distributions of Fabrication Flaws in Reactor Pressure Vessels for Structural Integrity Evaluations

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Simonen ◽  
G. J. Schuster ◽  
S. R. Doctor ◽  
T. L. Dickson
Keyword(s):  
Pacific Northwest ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Distribution Functions ◽  
Pressurized Thermal Shock ◽  
Regulatory Commission ◽  
Reactor Pressure

To reduce uncertainties in flaw-related inputs for probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) evaluations, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) has supported research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) involving nondestructive and destructive examinations for fabrication flaws in reactor pressure vessel (RPV) material. Using these data, statistical distributions have been developed to characterize the flaws in regions of a RPV. The regions include the main seam welds, repair welds, base metal, and the cladding at the inner surface of the vessel. This paper summarizes the available data and describes the treatment of these data to estimate flaw densities, flaw depth distributions, and flaw aspect ratio distributions. The methodology has generated flaw-related inputs for PFM calculations that have been part of an effort to update pressurized thermal shock (PTS) regulations. Statistical treatments of uncertainties in the parameters of the flaw distribution functions are part of the inputs to the PFM calculations. The paper concludes with a presentation of some example input files that have supported evaluations by USNRC of the risk of vessel failures caused by PTS events.

Overview of the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 Reactor Pressure Vessel Safety Cases

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel De Smet ◽  
Jean Van Vyve
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Operating Mode ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Irradiation Embrittlement ◽  
Safety Case ◽  
On Line ◽  
Safety Cases ◽  
Integrity Analysis ◽  
Reactor Pressure

During the summer outages of 2012, large numbers of indications were found inside the shell material of the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 reactor pressure vessels (RPV). Therefore both plants remained in cold shutdown with their core unloaded. A series of examinations, tests and inspections were performed leading to the conclusion that the indications are hydrogen flakes and that they do not affect the structural integrity of the RPVs, regardless the operating mode, transient or accident condition. All this was documented in the Safety Case Reports issued in December 2012 and the Safety Case Addenda issued in April 2013. Based on those reports, the Belgian Federal Agency for Nuclear Control (FANC) authorized the restart of both units that went back on-line in June 2013. In parallel, a number of requirements from the FANC were addressed such as the qualification of the applied Ultrasonic Testing (UT) procedure, and mechanical testing of irradiated specimens containing hydrogen flakes. The preliminary tests showed unexpected results regarding the shift in RTNDT (Reference Temperature for Nil Ductility Transition) under irradiation that could not confirm the hypotheses considered in the initial Safety Case Reports. Therefore, the Licensee Electrabel decided to shut down both plants immediately. In order to fully address this concern, the material test programme was extended including several RPV materials and covering additional irradiation campaigns. This led to a modification of the irradiation embrittlement trend curves considered in the structural integrity analysis. In addition, the qualification of the UT procedure led to an updated cartography of the flakes. The structural integrity assessments of both RPVs were revised accordingly. The final Safety Case Reports, confirming the fitness-for-continued operation of both RPVs, were submitted to the FANC in October 2015. FANC allowed restart of both units on November 17th, 2015. The paper gives a historical overview of the Doel 3 and Tihange 2 RPV Safety Cases and explains how the roadmap was built in order to demonstrate the RPV’s structural integrity in the presence of hydrogen flakes.

French RPV PTS Assessment: An Overview of EDF Research and Development in Progress on Thermalhydraulic, Materials and Mechanical Aspects

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Moinereau ◽  
Jean-Michel Frund ◽  
Henriette Churier-Bossennec ◽  
Georges Bezdikian ◽  
Alain Martin
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Crack Arrest ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Short Description ◽  
Constraint Effect ◽  
Materials Properties ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Pressurized Thermal Shock ◽  
Reactor Pressure

A significant extensive Research & Development work is conducted by Electricite´ de France (EDF) related to the structural integrity re-assessment of the French 900 and 1300 MWe reactor pressure vessels in order to increase their lifetime. Within the framework of this programme, numerous developments have been implemented or are in progress related to the methodology to assess flaws during a pressurized thermal shock (PTS) event. The paper contains three aspects: a short description of the specific French approach for RPV PTS assessment, a presentation of recent improvements on thermalhydraulic, materials and mechanical aspects, and finally an overview of the present R&D programme on thermalhydraulic, materials and mechanical aspects. Regarding the last aspect on present R&D programme, several projects in progress will be shortly described. This overview includes the redefinition of some significant thermalhydraulic transients based on some new three-dimensional CFD computations (focused at the present time on small break LOCA transient), the assessment of vessel materials properties, and the improvement of the RPV PTS structural integrity assessment including several themes such as warm pre-stress (WPS), crack arrest, constraint effect ....

Verification of Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Analysis Code for Reactor Pressure Vessel

2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Genshichiro Katsumata ◽  
Koichi Masaki ◽  
Shotaro Hayashi ◽  
Yu Itabashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Irradiation Embrittlement ◽  
Energy Agency ◽  
Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Integrity Assessments ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Abstract Nowadays, it has been recognized that probabilistic fracture mechanics (PFM) is a promising methodology in structural integrity assessments of aged pressure boundary components of nuclear power plants, because it can rationally represent the influencing parameters in their inherent probabilistic distributions without over conservativeness. A PFM analysis code PFM analysis of structural components in aging light water reactor (PASCAL) has been developed by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency to evaluate the through-wall cracking frequencies of domestic reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) considering neutron irradiation embrittlement and pressurized thermal shock (PTS) transients. In addition, efforts have been made to strengthen the applicability of PASCAL to structural integrity assessments of domestic RPVs against nonductile fracture. A series of activities has been performed to verify the applicability of PASCAL. As a part of the verification activities, a working group was established with seven organizations from industry, universities, and institutes voluntarily participating as members. Through one-year activities, the applicability of PASCAL for structural integrity assessments of domestic RPVs was confirmed with great confidence. This paper presents the details of the verification activities of the working group, including the verification plan, approaches, and results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document