Simulation of Transient Heat Transfer of Sandwich Pipes With Active Electrical Heating

Author(s):  
Djane R. Cerqueira ◽  
Jian Su ◽  
Segen F. Estefen

Sandwich pipes consisting of two concentric metal pipes with insulation material in the annulus have been developed to meet challenging mechanical and thermal requirements of deep and ultra deepwater oil and gas production. Passive thermal insulation is designed to meet flow assurance requirements under steady-state production conditions, but is unlikely to meet more severe conditions during transient events such as warm-up and cool-down. In this work, we present the analysis of transient heat transfer in the sandwich pipelines with active electrical heating. The mathematical model governing the heat conduction in the composite pipeline and the energy transport in the produced fluid is solved by using finite difference methods. As unplanned cool-down of the pipelines is most critical to safe and economical operation of pipelines in deep and ultra deep water conditions, it is presented here numerical results of computational simulation of cool-down for three sandwich pipeline configurations under typical production conditions. The analyses show that the sandwich pipe with active heating is a viable solution to meet severe flow assurance requirements of ultra deepwater oil production even under unplanned and prolonged cool-down conditions.

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Su ◽  
Djane R. Cerqueira ◽  
Segen F. Estefen

This paper presents an analysis of transient heat transfer in sandwich pipelines with active electrical heating. The mathematical models governing the heat conduction in the composite pipeline and the energy transport in the produced fluid were solved by using finite difference methods. Numerical results of computational simulation of cool-down for three sandwich pipeline configurations under typical production conditions were presented. The analysis showed that the sandwich pipe with active heating is a viable solution to meet severe flow assurance requirements of ultra-deepwater oil production even under unplanned and prolonged cool-down conditions.


Author(s):  
Jian Su ◽  
Djane R. Cerqueira ◽  
Segen F. Estefen

Sandwich pipes consisting of two concentric metal pipes with insulation material in annulus have been developed to meet challenging mechanical and thermal requirements of deep and ultra deepwater oil and gas production. Passive thermal insulation is designed to meet flow assurance requirements under steady-state production conditions, but is unlikely to meet more severe conditions during transient events such as warm-up and cool-down. In this work, we propose a new sandwhich pipe system with active electrical heating, provided by a number of electrical resistance strips stuck longitudinally over the outer surface of the inner metal pipe. A steady-state heat transfer analysis is carried out to determine the temperature distribution in a cross section of the sandwich pipe, the power requirement of electrical heating, and the overall heat transfer coefficient. It is shown that the sandwich pipe with active heating is a viable solution to meet server flow assurance requirements of ultra deepwater oil production.


Author(s):  
Soheil Manouchehri ◽  
Guillaume Hardouin ◽  
David Kaye ◽  
Jason Potter

Pipe-In-Pipe (PIP) systems are increasingly used in subsea oil and gas production where a low Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient (OHTC) is required. A PIP system is primarily composed of an insulated inner pipe which carries the production fluid and an outer pipe that protects the insulation material from the seawater environment. This provides a dry environment within the annulus and therefore allows the use of high quality dry insulation system. In addition, from a safety point of view, it provides additional structural integrity and a protective barrier which safeguards the pipeline from loss of containment to the environment. Genesis has designed a number of PIP systems in accordance with the recognized subsea pipeline design codes including DNV-OS-F101 [1]. In section 13 F100 of the 2013 revision, a short section has been included in which PIP systems are discussed and overall design requirements for such systems are provided. It has also been stated that the inner and outer pipes need to have the same Safety Class (SC) unless it can be documented otherwise. This paper looks at the selection of appropriate SC for the outer pipe in a design of PIP systems based on an assessment of different limit states, associated failure modes and consequences. Firstly, the fundamentals of selecting an acceptable SC for a PIP system are discussed. Then, different limit states and most probable failure modes that might occur under operational conditions are examined (in accordance with the requirements of [1]) and conclusions are presented and discussed. It is concluded that the SC of the outer pipe of a PIP system may be lower than that of the inner pipe, depending on the failure mode and approach adopted by the designer.


SPE Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 1166-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Jianbo Zhang ◽  
Xuerui Wang ◽  
Jing Yu ◽  
...  

Summary Hydrate-associated problems pose a key concern to the oil and gas industry when moving toward deeper-offshore reservoir development. A better understanding of hydrate-blockage-development behavior can help flow-assurance engineers develop more-economical and environmentally friendly hydrate-management strategies for deepwater operations. In this work, a model is proposed to describe the hydrate-blockage-formation behavior in testing tubing during deepwater-gas-well testing. The reliability of the model is verified with drillstem-testing (DST) data. Case studies are performed with the proposed model. They indicate that hydrates form and deposit on the tubing walls, creating a continuously growing hydrate layer, which narrows the tubing, increases the pressure drop, and finally results in conduit blockage. The hydrate-layer thickness is nonuniform. At some places, the hydrate layer grows more quickly, and this is the high-blockage-risk region (HBRR). The HBRR is not located where the lowest ambient temperature is encountered, but rather at the position where maximum subcooling of the produced gas is presented. As an example case—a deepwater gas well with a water depth of 1565 m and a gas-production rate of 45 × 104 m3/d—the hydrate blockage first forms at the depth of 150 m. In the section with a depth from 50 to 350 m, hydrates deposit more rapidly and this is the HBRR. As the water depth increases and/or the gas-flow rate decreases, the HBRR becomes deeper. Inhibitors can delay the occurrence of hydrate blockage. The hydrate problems can be handled with a smaller amount of inhibitors during deepwater well-testing operations. This work provides new insights for engineers to develop a new-generation flow-assurance technique to handle hydrate-associated problems during deepwater operations.


2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
R. Freij-Ayoub ◽  
M. Rivero ◽  
E. Nakagawa

Offshore exploration and production is going to deep and ultra deep waters, driven by the depletion of continental shelf reserves and the high demand for hydrocarbons. This move requires the continued extension of existing technologies and the development of new technologies that will make the investment economically viable. Innovative flow assurance technology is needed to support ultra deepwater production, particularly within the concept of platform free fields where there is a need to minimise interventions.Hydrates present one of the major challenges in flow assurance. Deep and ultra deep water operations together with long tiebacks present the ideal conditions for the formation of hydrates which can result in pipeline blockage and serious operational and safety concerns. Methods to combat hydrates range between control and management. One main technique has been to produce the hydrocarbons outside of the thermodynamic stability domain of hydrates. This is achieved by keeping the temperature of the hydrocarbon above the stability temperature of hydrates by insulating the pipe line, or by introducing heat to the hydrocarbon. Another efficient way of combating hydrates has been to shift the hydrate phase boundary to lower temperatures by using chemicals like methanol and mono ethylene glycol (MEO) which are known as thermodynamic inhibitors. Within the last decade a new generation of hydrate inhibitors called low dosage hydrate inhibitors (LDHI) has been introduced. One type of these LDHI are kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHI) that, when used in small concentrations, slow down hydrate growth by increasing the induction time for their formation and preventing the start of the rapid growth stage. Another approach to managing hydrates has been to allow them to form in a controlled manner and transport the hydrate-hydrocarbon slurry in the production pipe. In this paper we describe the various approaches used to combat hydrates to ensure flow assurance and we discuss the cons and pros of every approach and the technology gaps.


2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (08) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Birger Velle Hanssen

Flow assurance in subsea oil and gas fields often presents significant challenges. Every field has its own combination of difficulties, and no universal process or system can be used to mitigate these. Detailed knowledge across a broad range of competencies, therefore, is required to find solutions that can minimize the risk of not getting the hydrocarbons safely to the process facilities. Many subsea fields that are being developed today are long tiebacks, taking advantage of existing offshore infrastructure or producing directly to shore. These developments must deal with the long-distance transport of hydrocarbons in deep cold water, commonly increasing the risk of hydrate formation and wax deposition, for example. In addition, large elevation changes from deep water to surface and topographical challenges along the pipeline can create flow-regime effects that can hinder production. The loss of temperature in a long subsea pipeline also creates challenges for fields that produce heavy oil because the oil viscosity in some cases increases dramatically at low temperatures, in addition to effective viscosities increasing because of oil and water emulsions. Other phenomena such as scale deposition, foaming, sand production, erosion, and corrosion must be considered and dealt with as well. Various smart-technology innovations for subsea oil and gas production contribute to reducing the risk of these flow-assurance issues. Some of them are described in this month’s selected SPE papers. A good example is as follows: When wells start to produce water, the operator needs to understand where the water is coming from and quantify volumes in order to start a mitigation program to avoid hydrate formation. This is one of the reasons why subsea multiphase flowmeters have become an essential feature in all new subsea fields. The most common remedy for flow-assurance problems is probably the use of chemical additives. A sensor technology that can directly determine the ratio between produced water and chemicals such as monoethylene glycol has been recently introduced in subsea production systems. This measurement enables the optimization of chemical-injection rates, thereby contributing to significant savings in capital expenditure (reduced design margins) and operational expenditure (reduced overdosage margins). Another effective way to prevent hydrates and wax is to keep the process temperature above critical limits by applying active flowline heating. New technologies for highly reliable and efficient subsea electrically heat-traced flowlines have recently been qualified, industrialized, and installed. Technologies as described here can play an important role in future subsea field developments. The recommended readings for this feature date back further back in time than usual, but are relevant to the theme of this year’s main selections. Recommended additional reading at OnePetro: www.onepetro.org. OTC 29232 Real-Time Subsea Hydrate Management in the World’s Longest Subsea Tieback by Christophe Vielliard, OneSubsea, a Schlumberger Company, et al. OTC 31078 Electrically Heated Trace Flowline on the Ærfugl Project—A Journey From Product Qualification to Offshore Campaign by Guy Mencarelli, Subsea 7, et al. SPE 195784 A New Flow-Assurance Strategy for the Vega Asset: Managing Hydrate and Integrity Risks on a Long Multiphase Flowline of a Norwegian Subsea Asset by Stephan Hatscher, Wintershall Norge, et al.


Author(s):  
Abdulaziz S. Al-Qasim ◽  
Fahad Almudairis ◽  
Abdulrahman Bin Omar ◽  
Abdullatif Omair

Abstract This paper discusses a method for optimizing production facilities design for onshore/offshore wells during new field development. Optimizing the development of new oil and gas fields necessitates the use of accurate predication techniques to minimize uncertainties associated with day-to-day operational challenges related to wells, pipelines and surface facilities. It involves the use of a transient multiphase flow simulator (TMFS) for designing new oil and gas production systems to determine the feasibility of its economic development. A synthetic offshore oil field that covers a wide range of subsurface and surface facility data is considered in this paper. 32 wells and two reservoirs are considered to evaluate the effect of varying sizes of tubing, wellhead choke, flowline, riser, and transport line. A detailed investigation of the scenario of emergency shutdowns to study its effect on the system is performed using TMFS. Other scenarios are also evaluated such as startup, depressurization, pigging, wax deposition, and hydrate formation. This paper provides a method to minimize the cost by selecting the optimum pipelines sizes and diameters, and investigating the requirements of insulation, risk of pipeline corrosions and other related flow assurance parameters. Different facility design scenarios are considered using TMFS tool to achieve operational flexibility and eliminate associated risks. Pressure and temperature conditions are evaluated under several parametric scenarios to determine the best dimensions of the production system. This paper will also provide insight into factors affecting the flow assurance of oil and gas reservoirs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document