Motion of Electron Gas and the Induced Nanofilm Electromigration

Author(s):  
Bing-Yang Cao ◽  
Qing-Guang Zhang ◽  
Zeng-Yuan Guo

Understanding how electron gas moves and induces electromigration is highly desirable in micro- and nano-electronic devices. Based on introducing some novel concepts of electron gas momentum, kinetic energy and resisting force, we establish the continuum, momentum and energy conservation equations of the electron gas in this paper. Through analyzing the control equations, the Ohm’s law can be derived if the inertial force or the kinetic energy of the electron gas is ignored. Thus, the Ohm’s law is no longer applicable if the variation of the electron gas momentum is too large to be ignored. For instance, the kinetic energy variation can not be ignored for the electron gas with a high velocity flowing along the conductor with variable cross-sections. Under such conditions, the electric resistance of the section-variable conductors is a function of the electric current density and direction, which is referred to as a kinetic energy effect on the electric resistance. Based on the control equations of the electron gas motion, the electron wind force and the kinetic energy can also be calculated. The kinetic energy transferred from the electron wind to metallic atoms increases greatly with the increasing electric current density. It may be comparable with the activated energy of the metallic atoms in nanofilms. Thus, the electromigration induced by the electron wind can be regarded as another kind of kinetic energy effect of the electron gas, i.e. kinetic energy effect on the electromigration.

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1347-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. M. Vasyliūnas

Abstract. Fundamentally, the time derivative of the electric field is given by the displacement-current term in Maxwell's generalization of Ampère's law, and the time derivative of the electric current density is given by the generalized Ohm's law. The latter is derived by summing the accelerations of all the plasma particles and can be written exactly, with no approximations, in a (relatively simple) primitive form containing no other time derivatives. When one is dealing with time scales long compared to the inverse of the electron plasma frequency and spatial scales large compared to the electron inertial length, however, the time derivative of the current density becomes negligible in comparison to the other terms in the generalized Ohm's law, which then becomes the equation that determines the electric field itself. Thus, on all scales larger than those of electron plasma oscillations, neither the time evolution of J nor that of E can be calculated directly. Instead, J is determined by B through Ampère's law and E by plasma dynamics through the generalized Ohm's law. The displacement current may still be non-negligible if the Alfvén speed is comparable to or larger than the speed of light, but it no longer determines the time evolution of E, acting instead to modify J. For theories of substorms, this implies that, on time scales appropriate to substorm expansion, there is no equation from which the time evolution of the current could be calculated, independently of ∇xB. Statements about change (disruption, diversion, wedge formation, etc.) of the electric current are merely descriptions of change in the magnetic field and are not explanations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 08004
Author(s):  
Łukasz Tomków

The model of a single Nuclotron-type cable is presented. The goal of this model is to assess the behaviour of the cable under different loads. Two meshes with different simplifications are applied. In the first case, the superconductor in the cable is modelled as single region. Second mesh considers individual strands of the cable. The significant differences between the distributions of the electric current density obtained with both models are observed. The magnetic field remains roughly similar.


1869 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 579-583
Author(s):  
Tait

The following note refers to some experiments instituted at the request of Mr Dewar, who asked me to determine the polarisation of the Palladium electrodes whose singular behaviour he recently described to the Society.I had just obtained one of Sir W. Thomson's most recent forms of quadrant electrometer, and it occurred to me that this must be the proper instrument for determining polarisation, as its indicacations are not affected by electric resistance, and give directly—that is, without assuming the truth of Ohm's law for reverse electromotive forces, and the consequent necessary determinations of resistance—the quantities required.


2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolando Placeres Jiménez ◽  
Ana Elisa Bergues Pupo ◽  
Jesús Manuel Bergues Cabrales ◽  
Javier Antonio González Joa ◽  
Luis Enrique Bergues Cabrales ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document