A Comprehensive Approach to Corrosion Management Based on Structural Reliability Methods

Author(s):  
Mark Stephens ◽  
Maher Nessim

Quantitative analysis approaches based on structural reliability methods are gaining wider acceptance as a basis for assessing pipeline integrity and these methods are ideally suited to managing metal loss corrosion damage as identified through in-line inspection. The essence of this approach is to combine deterministic failure prediction models with in-line inspection data, the physical and operational characteristics of the pipeline, corrosion growth rate projections, and the uncertainties inherent in this information, to estimate the probability of corrosion failure as a function of time. The probability estimates so obtained provide the basis for informed decisions on which defects to repair, when to repair them and when to re-inspect. While much has been written in recent years on these types of analyses, the authors are not aware of any published methods that address all of the factors that can significantly influence the probability estimates obtained from such an analysis. Of particular importance in this context are the uncertainties associated with the reported defect data, the uncertainties associated with the models used to predict failure from this defect data, and the approach used to discriminate between failure by leak and failure by burst. The correct discrimination of failure mode is important because tolerable failure probabilities should depend on the mode of failure, with lower limits being required for burst failures because the consequences of failure are typically orders of magnitude more severe than for leaks. This paper provides an overview of a probabilistic approach to corrosion defect management that addresses the key sources of uncertainty and discriminates between failure modes. This approach can be used to assess corrosion integrity based on in-line inspection data, schedule defect repairs and provide guidance in establishing re-inspection intervals.

Author(s):  
Sherif Hassanien ◽  
Len Leblanc ◽  
Javier Cuervo ◽  
Karmun Cheng

Reliability engineering science is a mature discipline that has been used extensively in industries such as aviation, nuclear energy, automobiles, and structures. The application of reliability principles (especially structural reliability) in oil and gas transmission pipelines is still an active area of development. The advent of high resolution in-line inspections tools (ILI) facilitates a formal application/utilization of reliability methods in pipeline integrity in order to safely manage deformation, metal loss, and crack threats. At the same time, the massive amount of ILI data, their associated uncertainties, and the availability/accuracy of failure prediction models present a challenge for operators to effectively implement the use of reliability analysis to check the safety of integrity programs within available timeframes. On the other hand, approximate reliability techniques may affect the analysis in terms of both accuracy and precision. In this paper, a Pipeline Integrity Reliability Analysis (PIRA) approach is presented where the sophistication of the reliability analysis is staged into three levels: PIRA levels I, II and III. The three PIRA levels correspond to different representations of integrity uncertainties, uses of available validated/calibrated data, uses of statistical models for operating pressure and resistance random variables, implementation of reliability methods, and consideration of failure modes. Moreover, PIRA levels allow for improved integration of reliability analysis with the existing timelines/stages of traditional integrity programs, such that integrity data are updated as the integrity program progresses. The proposed integrity reliability approach allows for the delivery of safety checks leveraging all types of information available at any given point in time. In addition, the approach provides a full understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each PIRA level. Pipeline corrosion case studies are provided herein to illustrate how the PIRA Levels can be applied to integrity programs.


Author(s):  
Mark Stephens ◽  
Maher Nessim ◽  
Albert van Roodselaar

Quantitative analysis based on structural reliability methods is ideally suited to managing corrosion and cracking damage in pipelines as identified through in-line inspection. An ongoing industry-sponsored initiative has laid out a reliability-based process that is intended to form the basis for an industry-accepted approach to assessing and managing pipeline integrity with respect to these damage mechanisms, with an initial focus on metal-loss corrosion. The process combines appropriate failure prediction models, in-line inspection data, the physical and operational characteristics of the pipeline, and corrosion growth rate projections, within a probabilistic analysis framework, to estimate the likelihood of corrosion failure as a function of time. It also provides the means to assess the beneficial impact of selective and staged defect remediation and to evaluate candidate remediation strategies to determine the most cost-effective approach. This paper summarizes the reliability-based assessment and integrity management process. It also illustrates how the results provided can be used to determine the most cost-effective maintenance strategy in terms of the number of features to be remediated and the preferred time to next inspection.


Author(s):  
Mark Stephens ◽  
Albert van Roodselaar

The pipeline industry is moving to embrace more quantitative analysis methods for assessing pipeline integrity and demonstrating the benefits of integrity maintenance programs. Analysis based on structural reliability concepts is ideally suited to this purpose. In the context of corrosion management, the essence of this approach is to combine appropriate failure prediction models, in-line inspection data, the physical and operational characteristics of the pipeline, and corrosion growth rate projections, within a probabilistic analysis framework, to estimate the likelihood of corrosion failure as a function of time. A key element in this analysis approach is explicit consideration of all significant forms of uncertainty, including the uncertainties inherent in the data obtained from in-line inspection. This paper provides an overview of an ongoing research project, sponsored by the Pipeline Research Council International (PRCI), which is developing a reliability-based process that will form the basis for an industry-accepted approach to assessing and managing pipeline integrity with respect to corrosion. It also discusses the sources of uncertainty inherent in the in-line inspection process and their significance in the context of corrosion reliability analysis.


Author(s):  
Mir Emad Mousavi ◽  
Sanjeev Upadhye ◽  
Kevin Haverty

The design of riser systems can be improved if structural reliability methods are used to assess their safety and integrity and confirm that such design meets a target annual probability of failure. TTRs are typically multi–bore assemblies involving several sub-assemblies. The failure of any of the components of a TTR under extreme or service environmental conditions can lead to an immediate failure of the entire assembly and impose a direct risk of damaging the wellheads, conductors, casing and tubing hangers, or other subsea equipment, because they are installed directly on top of the wellhead. However, the actual strength safety of the TTR cannot be examined unless after it is installed and examined under extreme events. Because of the numerous uncertainties associated with the design of TTRs, a probabilistic approach based on structural reliability methods can account for many of those uncertainties and serve as a basis for their reliable and cost-effective design. In turn, a comprehensive reliability assessment of a TTR requires extensive analysis that is considerably more complex and time consuming compared to a conventional deterministic-based analysis. This paper presents a probabilistic-based simplified methodology for the strength reliability assessment of TTR systems. In this method, marginal values on some uncertain model inputs are considered similar to the conventional analysis methods but, some key random variables related to environmental demands and component capacities are considered with their associated probability distributions. As a result, this method can be used to estimate the minimum level of safety of the TTR under extreme events. Additionally, results of the proposed method are discussed for integrity analysis and integrity-based optimal design of the TTR system, which compare the safety of the TTR components and estimate the component Optimality Factors for improving the design integrity and meeting a target minimum annual probability of failure.


Author(s):  
Ryan Sporns ◽  
Steven Bott ◽  
David Playdon

A quantitative pipeline integrity analysis based on structural-reliability methods has been used to establish corrosion re-assessment intervals from in-line inspection data. This process, as implemented in a simulation-based software package, incorporates in line inspection (ILI) data, physical and operation characteristics of the pipeline, corrosion growth rate projections, and the uncertainties inherent in this information, to estimate the probability of failure (POF) as a function of time. Using this approach, the POF value is calculated on a joint-by-joint basis and the calculated values are then compared with an acceptable POF level to verify the integrity of each joint in any given year. Based on this information a re-assessment interval is established and selected joints are targeted for excavation and repair to ensure that the acceptable POF level is not exceeded.


Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 3562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Zalameda ◽  
William Winfree

Real-time nondestructive evaluation is critical during composites load testing. Of particular importance is the real time measurement of damage onset, growth, and ultimate failure. When newly formed damage is detected, the loading is stopped for further detailed characterization using ultrasound inspections or X-ray computed tomography. This detailed inspection data are used to document failure modes and ultimately validate damage prediction models. Passive thermography is used to monitor heating from damage formation in a hat-stiffened woven graphite epoxy composite panel during quasi-static seven-point load testing. Data processing techniques are presented that enable detection of the small transient thermographic signals resulting from damage formation in real time. It has been observed that the temperature rise due to damage formation at the surface is composed of two thermal responses. The first response is instantaneous and conforms to the shape of the damage. This heating is most likely due to irreversible thermoelastic, plastic deformation, and microstructural heating. The second response is a transient increase in temperature due to mechanical heating at the interface of failure. Two-dimensional multi-layered thermal simulations based on quadrupole method are used to investigate the thermal responses. In particular, the instantaneous response is used as the transient response start time to determine damage depth. The passive thermography measurement results are compared to ultrasonic measurements for validation.


Author(s):  
Markus R. Dann ◽  
Marc A. Maes ◽  
Mamdouh M. Salama

To manage the integrity of corroded pipelines reliable estimates of the current and future corrosion growth process are required. They are often obtained from in-line inspection data by matching defects from two or more inspections and determining corrosion growth rates from the observed growth paths. In practice only a (small) subset of the observed defects are often reliably matched and used in the subsequent corrosion growth analysis. The information from the remaining unmatched defects on the corrosion growth process are typically ignored. Hence, all decisions that depend on the corrosion growth process such as maintenance and repair requirements and re-inspection intervals, are based on the information obtained from the (small) set of matched defects rather than all observed corrosion anomalies. A new probabilistic approach for estimating corrosion growth from in-line inspection data is introduced. It does not depend on defect matching and the associated defect matching uncertainties. The reported defects of an inspection are considered from a population perspective and the corrosion growth is determined from two or more defect populations. The distribution of the reported defect sizes is transformed into the distribution of the actual defect sizes by adjusting it for detectability, false calls, and sizing uncertainties. The obtained distribution is then used to determine the parameters of the assumed gamma-distributed corrosion growth process in order to forecast future metal loss in the pipeline. As defect matching is not required all reported corrosion defects are used in the probabilistic analysis rather than the truncated set of matched defects. A numerical example is provided where two in-line inspections are analyzed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoyang Xie ◽  
Hong-Zhong Huang

Corrosion is recognized as one of the most important degradation mechanisms that affect the long-term reliability and integrity of metallic structures. Studying the structural reliability with pitting corrosion damage is useful for risk control and safety operation for the corroded structure. This paper proposed a structure corrosion reliability analysis approach based on the physics-based failure model of pitting corrosion, where the states of pitting growth, pit-to-crack, and cracking propagation are included in failure model. Then different probabilistic analysis methods such as Monte-Carlo Simulation (MCS), First-Order Reliability Method (FORM), Second-Order Reliability Method (SORM), and response surface method are employed to calculate the reliability. At last, an example is presented to demonstrate the capability of the proposed structural reliability model and calculating methods for structural corrosion failure analysis.


Author(s):  
Marcus McCallum ◽  
Chas Jandu ◽  
Andrew Francis

All pipelines are susceptible to the possibility of corrosion damage. Corrosion is a time dependent process that leads to localised gradual thinning of the pipeline wall and if allowed to continue will eventually cause failure of the pipewall. Due to the progressive nature of corrosion the likelihood of failure increases with time. One means of mitigating the likelihood of such failures is to perform an in-line inspection using a metal loss detection tool. The frequency of inspection is an important parameter to operators since if it is too high, excessive costs will be incurred and if it is too low, failure involving loss of supply, threats to safety and the environment may follow. Operators therefore seek the optimum frequency. This paper describes a robust method for optimizing inspection intervals based on the use of structural reliability analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (A4) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Hifi ◽  
N Barltrop

This paper applies a newly developed methodology to calibrate the corrosion model within a structural reliability analysis. The methodology combines data from experience (measurements and expert judgment) and prediction models to adjust the structural reliability models. Two corrosion models published in the literature have been used to demonstrate the technique used for the model calibration. One model is used as a prediction for a future degradation and a second one to represent the inspection recorded data. The results of the calibration process are presented and discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document