Development of Large-Eddy Simulation for Vehicle Aerodynamics

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Krajnovic ◽  
L. Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Quantitative Prediction ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Aerodynamic Properties ◽  
Lower Reynolds Number ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Flow Features ◽  
Vehicle Aerodynamics

The feasibility of use of large-eddy simulation (LES) in external vehicle aerodynamics is investigated. The computational cost needed for LES of the full size car at road conditions is beyond the capability of the computers in the near future (Krajnovic´ (2002)). Since LES cannot be used for quantitative prediction of this flow, i.e. obtaining the aerodynamic forces and moments, an alternative use of this technique is suggested that can enhance the understanding of the flow around a car. It is found that making LES of the flow around simplified car-like shapes at lower Reynolds number can increase our knowledge of the flow around a car. Two simulations are made, one of the flow around a cube and the other of the flow around a simplified bus. The former simulation proved that LES with relatively coarse resolution and simple inlet boundary condition can provide accurate results. The latter simulation resulted in flow in agreement with experimental observations and displayed some flow features that were not observed in experiments or steady simulations of such flows. This simulation gave us possibility to study the transient mechanisms that are responsible for the aerodynamic properties of a car. The knowledge gained from this simulation can be used by the stylist to tune the aerodynamics of the car’s design but also by the CFD specialists to improve the turbulence models.

scholarly journals Large Eddy Simulation of Film Cooling Involving Compound Angle Holes: Comparative Study of LES and RANS

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Seung Il Baek ◽  
Joon Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Orientation Angle ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Injection Angle ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Compound Angle

A large eddy simulation (LES) was performed for film cooling in the gas turbine blade involving spanwise injection angles (orientation angles). For a streamwise coolant injection angle (inclination angle) of 35°, the effects of the orientation angle were compared considering a simple angle of 0° and 30°. Two ratios of the coolant to main flow mass flux (blowing ratio) of 0.5 and 1.0 were considered and the experimental conditions of Jung and Lee (2000) were adopted for the geometry and flow conditions. Moreover, a Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulation (RANS) was performed to understand the characteristics of the turbulence models compared to those in the LES and experiments. In the RANS, three turbulence models were compared, namely, the realizable k-ε, k-ω shear stress transport, and Reynolds stress models. The temperature field and flow fields predicted through the RANS were similar to those obtained through the experiment and LES. Nevertheless, at a simple angle, the point at which the counter-rotating vortex pair (CRVP) collided on the wall and rose was different from that in the experiment and LES. Under the compound angle, the point at which the CRVP changed to a single vortex was different from that in the LES. The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness could not be accurately determined through the RANS but was well reflected by the LES, even under the compound angle. The reattachment of the injectant at a blowing ratio of 1.0 was better predicted by the RANS at the compound angle than at the simple angle. The temperature fluctuation was predicted to decrease slightly when the injectant was supplied at a compound angle.

Large Eddy Simulation of the Flow Around a Diffuser-Equipped Bluff Body in Ground Effect

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lara Schembri Puglisevich ◽  
Gary Page
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Bluff Body ◽  
Vortex Formation ◽  
Ground Effect ◽  
Vortical Flow ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Flow Structures ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Flow Features

Unsteady Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is carried out for the flow around a bluff body equipped with an underbody rear diffuser in close proximity to the ground, representing an automotive diffuser. The goal is to demonstrate the ability of LES to model underbody vortical flow features at experimental Reynolds numbers (1.01 × 106 based on model height and incoming velocity). The scope of the time-dependent simulations is not to improve on Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS), but to give further insight into vortex formation and progression, allowing better understanding of the flow, hence allowing more control. Vortical flow structures in the diffuser region, along the sides and top surface of the bluff body are successfully modelled. Differences between instantaneous and time-averaged flow structures are presented and explained. Comparisons to pressure measurements from wind tunnel experiments on an identical bluff body model shows a good level of agreement.

Evaluation of Turbulence Models Using Direct Numerical and Large-Eddy Simulation Data

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Raiesi ◽  
Ugo Piomelli ◽  
Andrew Pollard
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Square Duct ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

The performance of some commonly used eddy-viscosity turbulence models has been evaluated using direct numerical simulation (DNS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) data. Two configurations have been tested, a two-dimensional boundary layer undergoing pressure-driven separation, and a square duct. The DNS and LES were used to assess the k−ε, ζ−f, k−ω, and Spalart–Allmaras models. For the two-dimensional separated boundary layer, anisotropic effects are not significant and the eddy-viscosity assumption works well. However, the near-wall treatment used in k−ε models was found to have a critical effect on the predictive accuracy of the model (and, in particular, of separation and reattachment points). None of the wall treatments tested resulted in accurate prediction of the flow field. Better results were obtained with models that do not require special treatment in the inner layer (ζ−f, k−ω, and Spalart–Allmaras models). For the square duct calculation, only a nonlinear constitutive relation was found to be able to capture the secondary flow, giving results in agreement with the data. Linear models had significant error.

scholarly journals Investigation of the velocity field downstream of a benchmark vent using numerical simulation and hot-wire anemometry

2019 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 02076
Author(s):  
Jan Sip ◽  
Frantisek Lizal ◽  
Jakub Elcner ◽  
Jan Pokorny ◽  
Miroslav Jicha
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Dynamics ◽  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Velocity Field ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Hot Wire ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Precise Prediction

The velocity field in the area behind the automotive vent was measured by hot-wire anenemometry in detail and intensity of turbulence was calculated. Numerical simulation of the same flow field was performed using Computational fluid dynamics in commecial software STAR-CCM+. Several turbulence models were tested and compared with Large Eddy Simulation. The influence of turbulence model on the results of air flow from the vent was investigated. The comparison of simulations and experimental results showed that most precise prediction of flow field was provided by Spalart-Allmaras model. Large eddy simulation did not provide results in quality that would compensate for the increased computing cost.

scholarly journals Numerical Framework for the Computation of Urban Flux Footprints Employing Large-eddy Simulation and Lagrangian Stochastic Modeling

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikko Auvinen ◽  
Leena Järvi ◽  
Antti Hellsten ◽  
Üllar Rannik ◽  
Timo Vesala
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Urban Landscape ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Source Area ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Particle Analysis ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Flux Measurements ◽  
Urban Footprint

Abstract. Conventional footprint models cannot account for the heterogeneity of the urban landscape imposing a pronounced uncertainty on the spatial interpretation of eddy-covariance (EC) flux measurements in urban studies. This work introduces a computational methodology that enables the generation of detailed footprints in arbitrarily complex urban flux measurements sites. The methodology is based on conducting high-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) and Lagrangian stochastic (LS) particle analysis on a model that features a detailed topographic description of a real urban environment. The approach utilizes an arbitrarily sized target volume set around the sensor in the LES domain, to collect a dataset of LS particles which are seeded from the potential source-area of the measurement and captured at the sensor site. The urban footprint is generated from this dataset through a piecewise post-processing procedure, which divides the footprint evaluation into multiple independent processes that each yield an intermediate result that are ultimately selectively combined to produce the final footprint. The strategy reduces the computational cost of the LES-LS simulation and incorporates techniques to account for the complications that arise when the EC sensor is mounted on a building instead of a conventional flux tower. The presented computational framework also introduces a result assessment strategy which utilizes the obtained urban footprint together with a detailed land cover type dataset to estimate the potential error that may arise if analytically derived footprint models were employed instead. The methodology is demonstrated with a case study that concentrates on generating the footprint for a building-mounted EC measurement station in downtown Helsinki, Finland, under neutrally stratified atmospheric boundary layer.

A Dynamic Time Filtering Technique for Hybrid RANS-LES Simulation of Non-Stationary Turbulent Flow

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tausif Jamal ◽  
D. Keith Walters
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Complex Flow ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Filtering Technique ◽  
Dynamic Time

Abstract Unsteady turbulent wall bounded flows can produce complex flow physics including temporally varying mean pressure gradients, intermittent regions of high turbulence intensity, and interaction of different scales of motion. As a representative example, pulsating channel flow presents significant challenges for newly developed and existing turbulence models in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The present study investigates the performance of the Dynamic Hybrid RANS-LES (DHRL) model with a newly proposed dynamic time filtering (DTF) technique, compared against an industry standard Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model, Monotonically Integrated Large Eddy Simulation (MILES), and two conventional Hybrid RANS-LES (HRL) models. Model performance is evaluated based on comparison to previously documented Large Eddy Simulation (LES) results. Simulations are performed for a fully developed flow in a channel with time-periodic driving pressure gradient. Results highlight the relative merits of each model type and indicate that the use of a dynamic time filtering technique improves the accuracy of the DHRL model when compared to a static time filtering technique. A comprehensive evaluation of the results suggests that the DHRL-DTF method provides the most consistently accurate reproduction of the time-dependent mean flow characteristics for all models investigated.

Current Status on High Performance Computing for Vehicle Aerodynamics Using Large Eddy Simulation

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Makoto Tsubokura ◽  
Takuji Nakashima ◽  
Nobuyuki Oshima ◽  
Kozo Kitoh ◽  
Huilai Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Wind Tunnel Measurement ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Vehicle Aerodynamics ◽  
Performance Computing

The world’s largest class unsteady turbulence simulations of flow around vehicles were conducted using Large Eddy Simulation (LES) on the Earth Simulator in Japan. The main objective of our study is to investigate the validity of LES, as an alternative to a conventional wind tunnel measurement or the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes method, for the assessment of vehicle aerodynamics.

Validation of Species-Based Extended Coherent Flamelet Model in a Large Eddy Simulation of a Homogeneous Charge Spark Ignition Engine

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. See ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
J. Bohbot ◽  
O. Colin
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Spark Ignition ◽  
Spark Ignition Engine ◽  
Cylinder Pressure ◽  
Flamelet Model ◽  
Progress Variable ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Homogeneous Charge

Abstract The Species-Based Extended Coherent Flamelet Model (SB-ECFM) was developed and previously validated for 3D Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling of a spark-ignited gasoline direct injection engine. In this work, we seek to extend the SB-ECFM model to the large eddy simulation (LES) framework and validate the model in a homogeneous charge spark-ignited engine. In the SB-ECFM, which is a recently developed improvement of the ECFM, the progress variable is defined as a function of real species instead of tracer species. This adjustment alleviates discrepancies that may arise when the numerical treatment of real species is different than that of the tracer species. Furthermore, the species-based formulation also allows for the use of second-order numeric, which can be necessary in LES cases. The transparent combustion chamber (TCC) engine is the configuration used here for validating the SB-ECFM. It has been extensively characterized with detailed experimental measurements and the data are widely available for model benchmarking. Moreover, several of the boundary conditions leading to the engine are also measured experimentally. These measurements are used in the corresponding computational setup of LES calculations with SB-ECFM. Since the engine is spark ignited, the Imposed Stretch Spark Ignition Model (ISSIM) is utilized to model this physical process. The mesh for the current study is based on a configuration that has been validated in a previous LES study of the corresponding motored setup of the TCC engine. However, this mesh was constructed without considering the additional cells needed to sufficiently resolve the flame for the fired case. Thus, it is enhanced with value-based Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) on the progress variable to better capture the flame front in the fired case. As one facet of model validation, the ensemble average of the measured cylinder pressure is compared against the LES/SB-ECFM prediction. Secondly, the predicted cycle-to-cycle variation by LES is compared with the variation measured in the experimental setup. To this end, the LES computation is required to span a sufficient number of engine cycles to provide statistical convergence to evaluate the coefficient of variation (COV) in peak cylinder pressure. Due to the higher computational cost of LES, the runtime required to compute a sufficient number of engine cycles sequentially can be intractable. The concurrent perturbation method (CPM) is deployed in this study to obtain the required number of cycles in a reasonable time frame. Lastly, previous numerical and experimental analyses of the TCC engine have shown that the flow dynamics at the time of ignition is correlated with the cycle-to-cycle variability. Hence, similar analysis is performed on the current simulation results to determine if this correlation effect is well-captured by the current modeling approach.

A Large Eddy Simulation of the Bubbly Flow in Vertical Tube

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Xu Hong
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Bubbly Flow ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Vertical Tube ◽  
Simulation Approach ◽  
Bubble Distribution ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Two Fluid

This paper simulates the dispersed bubbly flow in a vertical tube with two different turbulence models based on Eulerian two-fluid frameworks. Both the RANS (Reynolds Averaged N-S equation) approach and LES (Large Eddy Simulation) approach can get results agreed with experiment well. The “wall peak” bubble distribution is captured. Compare with RANS with SST (Shear Stress Transport) turbulence model, the LES with WALE (Wall-Adapted Local Eddy-viscosity) sub-grid model can give transient and detail information of the flow field, and it shows better agreement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document