Current and Future Economics of Parabolic Trough Technology

Author(s):  
Henry Price ◽  
Mark Mehos ◽  
Chuck Kutscher ◽  
Nate Blair

Solar energy is the largest energy resource on the planet. Unfortunately, it is largely untapped at present, in part because sunlight is a very diffuse energy source. Concentrating solar power (CSP) systems use low cost reflectors to concentrate the sun’s energy to allow it to be used more effectively. Concentrating solar power systems are also well suited for large solar power plants that can be connected into the existing utility infrastructure. These two facts mean that CSP systems can be used to make a meaningful difference in energy supply in a relatively short period. CSP plants are best suited for the arid climates in the Southwestern United States, Northern Mexico, and many desert regions around the globe. A recent Western Governors’ Association siting study [1] found that the solar potential in the U.S. Southwest is at least 4 times the total U.S. electric demand even after eliminating urban areas, environmentally sensitive areas, and all regions with a ground slope greater than 1%.While it is currently not practical to power the whole county from the desert southwest, only a small portion of this area is needed to make a substantial contribution to future U.S. electric needs. Many of the best sites are near existing high-voltage transmission lines and close to major power load centers in the Southwest (Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Phoenix). In addition, the power provided by CSP technologies has strong coincidence with peak electric demand, especially in the Southwest where peak demand corresponds in large part to air conditioning loads. Parabolic troughs currently represent the most cost-effective CSP technology for developing large utility-scale solar electric power systems. These systems are also one of the most mature solar technologies, with commercial utility-scale plants that have been operating for over 20 years. In addition, substantial improvements have been made to the technology in recent years including improved efficiency and the addition of thermal energy storage. The main issue for parabolic trough technology is that the cost of electricity is still higher than the cost of electricity from conventional natural gas-fired power plants. Although higher natural gas prices are helping to substantially reduce the difference between the cost of electricity from solar and natural gas plants, in the near-term increased incentives such as the 30% Investment Tax Credit (ITC) are needed to make CSP technology approach competitiveness with natural gas power on a financial basis. In the longer term, additional reductions in the cost of the technology will be necessary. This paper looks at the near-term potential for parabolic trough technology to compete with conventional fossil power resources in the firm, intermediate load power market and at the longer term potential to compete in the baseload power market. The paper will consider the potential impact of a reduced carbon emissions future.

Author(s):  
Meng Liu ◽  
Noam Lior ◽  
Na Zhang ◽  
Wei Han

This paper presents a thermoeconomic optimization of a novel zero-CO2 and other emissions and high efficiency power and refrigeration cogeneration system, COOLCEP-S† which uses the liquefied natural gas (LNG) coldness during its revaporization. It was predicted that at the turbine inlet temperature (TIT) of 900°C, the energy efficiency of the COOLCEP-S system reaches 59%. The thermoeconomic optimization determines the specific cost, the cost of electricity, and the system payback period. The optimization started by performing a thermodynamic sensitivity analysis, which has shown that for a fixed TIT and pressure ratio, the pinch point temperature difference in the recuperator, ΔTp1, and that in the condenser, ΔTp2, are the most significant unconstrained variables to have a significant effect on the thermal performance of this novel cycle. The thermoeconomic analysis of the cycle (with fixed net power output of 20 MW and plant life of 40 years) shows that the payback period with the revenue from electricity and CO2 mitigation was ∼5.9 years, and would be reduced to ∼3.1 years when there is a market for the refrigeration byproduct. The capital investment cost of the economically optimized plant is estimated to be about $1,000/kWe, and the cost of electricity is estimated to be 0.34–0.37 CNY/kWh (∼0.04 $/kWh). These values are much lower than those of conventional coal power plants being installed at this time in China, which, in contrast to COOLCEP-S, do produce CO2 emissions at that.


Author(s):  
Henry Price ◽  
David Kearney

Parabolic trough solar technology is the most proven and lowest cost large-scale solar power technology available today, primarily because of the nine large commercial-scale solar power plants that are operating in the California Mojave Desert. However, no new plants have been built during the past ten years because the cost of power from these plants is more expensive than power from conventional fossil fuel power plants. This paper reviews the current cost of energy and the potential for reducing the cost of energy from parabolic trough solar power plant technology based on the latest technological advancements and projected improvements from industry and sponsored R&D. The paper also looks at the impact of project financing and incentives on the cost of energy.


Author(s):  
David Kearney ◽  
Henry Price

Parabolic trough power plant technology is one of the most demonstrated solar power options commercially available. While trough power plants are the least expensive solar option, cost of electricity still exceeds that needed to directly compete with conventional fossil-fired large-scale central power technologies. Several evaluations have been done that identify a series of mechanisms for significant cost reduction over the next decade. One of the opportunities for improving the economics of parabolic trough plants is the development of lower cost and more efficient thermal energy storage (TES) technologies. This paper focuses on several of the TES technologies currently under development, namely: the use of an indirect molten-salt storage system, the use of molten-salt as a heat transfer fluid in the solar field and thermal energy storage system, and the development of new types of storage fluids. The assessment compares the cost and performance of these candidate thermal energy storage technologies by evaluating their impact on the levelized cost of electricity from the plant. This analysis is updated based on work conducted on these technologies during the last year.


2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Pitz-Paal ◽  
Jürgen Dersch ◽  
Barbara Milow ◽  
Félix Téllez ◽  
Alain Ferriere ◽  
...  

Besides continuous implementation of concentrating solar power plants (CSP) in Europe, which stipulate cost reduction by mass production effects, further R&D activities are necessary to achieve the cost competitiveness to fossil power generation. The European Concentrated Solar Thermal Roadmap (ECOSTAR) study that was conducted by European research institutes in the field of CSP intends to stipulate the direction for R&D activities in the context of cost reduction. This paper gives an overview about the methodology and the results for one of the seven different CSP system concepts that are currently under promotion worldwide and considered within ECOSTAR. The technology presented here is the parabolic trough with direct steam generation (DSG), which may be considered as an evolution of the existing parabolic systems with thermal oil as heat transfer fluid. The methodology is explained using this exemplary system, and the technical improvements are evaluated according to their cost-reduction potential using a common approach, based on an annual performance model. Research priorities are given based on the results. The simultaneous implementation of three measures is required in order to achieve the cost-reduction target: Technical improvement by R&D, upscaling of the unit size, and mass production of the equipment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 3937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Bouaddi ◽  
Aránzazu Fernández-García ◽  
Chris Sansom ◽  
Jon Sarasua ◽  
Fabian Wolfertstetter ◽  
...  

The severe soiling of reflectors deployed in arid and semi arid locations decreases their reflectance and drives down the yield of the concentrating solar power (CSP) plants. To alleviate this issue, various sets of methods are available. The operation and maintenance (O&M) staff should opt for sustainable cleaning methods that are safe and environmentally friendly. To restore high reflectance, the cleaning vehicles of CSP plants must adapt to the constraints of each technology and to the layout of reflectors in the solar field. Water based methods are currently the most commonly used in CSP plants but they are not sustainable due to water scarcity and high soiling rates. The recovery and reuse of washing water can compensate for these methods and make them a more reasonable option for mediterranean and desert environments. Dry methods, on the other hand, are gaining more attraction as they are more suitable for desert regions. Some of these methods rely on ultrasonic wave or vibration for detaching the dust bonding from the reflectors surface, while other methods, known as preventive methods, focus on reducing the soiling by modifying the reflectors surface and incorporating self cleaning features using special coatings. Since the CSP plants operators aim to achieve the highest profit by minimizing the cost of cleaning while maintaining a high reflectance, optimizing the cleaning parameters and strategies is of great interest. This work presents the conventional water-based methods that are currently used in CSP plants in addition to sustainable alternative methods for dust removal and soiling prevention. Also, the cleaning effectiveness, the environmental impacts and the economic aspects of each technology are discussed.


Solar Energy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 589-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Ferruzza ◽  
Monika Topel ◽  
Björn Laumert ◽  
Fredrik Haglind

Author(s):  
Valentina A. ◽  
Carmelo E. ◽  
Giuseppe M. ◽  
Rosa Di ◽  
Fabrizio Girardi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document