On Multiphysics Discrete Element Modeling of Powder-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Steuben ◽  
Athanasios P. Iliopoulos ◽  
John G. Michopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Discrete Element Modeling ◽  
Metal Powders ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
Residual Strains ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Am Processes

Physically accurate modeling of powder-based additive manufacturing (AM) processes can play an enabling role for both the certification and qualification as well as the functional tailoring of materials produced by these processes. In an effort to address these needs in a computationally efficient and physically realistic manner, this paper presents the initial efforts towards the development of a methodology for simulating polydisperse particle-based AM processes by the use of the Multiphysics Discrete Element Method (MDEM). We discuss the formulation of a DEM framework for addressing the unique multiphysics behavior of AM materials and processes. In particular, we focus on coupled thermo-mechanical effects that result in residual strains and deformation. The MDEM approach is demonstrated on several test problems involving laser sintering of metal powders. The paper concludes with a discussion on how this approach may be generalized to broader classes of AM systems, and details are given regarding future work that must be accomplished in order to further develop the present methodology.

Toward Metamodels for Composable and Reusable Additive Manufacturing Process Models

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Witherell ◽  
Shaw Feng ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
David B. Saint John ◽  
Pan Michaleris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Metal Powder ◽  
Manufacturing Process ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Model Development ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Powder Bed Fusion ◽  
Powder Bed ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Am Processes

In this paper, we advocate for a more harmonized approach to model development for additive manufacturing (AM) processes, through classification and metamodeling that will support AM process model composability, reusability, and integration. We review several types of AM process models and use the direct metal powder bed fusion AM process to provide illustrative examples of the proposed classification and metamodel approach. We describe how a coordinated approach can be used to extend modeling capabilities by promoting model composability. As part of future work, a framework is envisioned to realize a more coherent strategy for model development and deployment.

Recent Developments of the Multiphysics Discrete Element Method for Additive Manufacturing Modeling and Simulation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Steuben ◽  
Athanasios P. Iliopoulos ◽  
John G. Michopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Discrete Element Method ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Additive Manufacture ◽  
Computational Tools ◽  
Computational Performance ◽  
Macro Scale ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Am Processes ◽  
Element Method

Recent years have seen a sharp increase in the development and usage of Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies for a broad range of scientific and industrial purposes. The drastic microstructural differences between materials produced via AM and conventional methods has motivated the development of computational tools that model and simulate AM processes in order to facilitate their control for the purpose of optimizing the desired outcomes. This paper discusses recent advances in the continuing development of the Multiphysics Discrete Element Method (MDEM) for the simulation of AM processes. This particle-based method elegantly encapsulates the relevant physics of powder-based AM processes. In particular, the enrichment of the underlying constitutive behaviors to include thermoplasticity is discussed, as are methodologies for modeling the melting and re-solidification of the feedstock materials. Algorithmic improvements that increase computational performance are also discussed. The MDEM is demonstrated to enable the simulation of the additive manufacture of macro-scale components. Concluding remarks are given on the tasks required for the future development of the MDEM, and the topic of experimental validation is also discussed.

Complex Solutions for Complex Problems? Exploring the Role of Design Task Choice on Learning, Design for Additive Manufacturing Use, and Creativity

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Prabhu ◽  
Scarlett R. Miller ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
Nicholas A. Meisel
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Problem Statement ◽  
Design Task ◽  
Complex Solutions ◽  
Future Work ◽  
Am Processes

Abstract The integration of additive manufacturing (AM) processes in many industries has led to the need for AM education and training, particularly on design for AM (DfAM). To meet this growing need, several academic institutions have implemented educational interventions, especially project- and problem-based, for AM education; however, limited research has explored how the choice of the problem statement influences the design outcomes of a task-based AM/DfAM intervention. This research explores this gap in the literature through an experimental study with 175 undergraduate engineering students. Specifically, the study compared the effects of restrictive and dual (restrictive and opportunistic) DfAM education, when introduced through design tasks that differed in the explicit use of design objectives and functional and manufacturing constraints in defining them. The effects of the intervention were measured through (1) changes in participant DfAM self-efficacy, (2) participants' self-reported emphasis on DfAM, and (3) the creativity of participants' design outcomes. The results show that the choice of the design task has a significant effect on the participants' self-efficacy with, and their self-reported emphasis on, certain DfAM concepts. The results also show that the design task containing explicit constraints and objectives results in participants generating ideas with greater uniqueness compared with the design task with fewer explicit constraints and objectives. These findings highlight the importance of the chosen problem statement on the outcomes of a DfAM educational intervention, and future work is also discussed.

scholarly journals Study of the Environmental Implications of Using Metal Powder in Additive Manufacturing and Its Handling

Metals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Iñaki Arrizubieta ◽  
Olatz Ukar ◽  
Marta Ostolaza ◽  
Arantza Mugica
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Environmental Impact ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Life Cycle Analysis ◽  
Chemical Compounds ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Environmental Implications ◽  
Work Related ◽  
High Concentrations ◽  
Am Processes

Additive Manufacturing, AM, is considered to be environmentally friendly when compared to conventional manufacturing processes. Most researchers focus on resource consumption when performing the corresponding Life Cycle Analysis, LCA, of AM. To that end, the sustainability of AM is compared to processes like milling. Nevertheless, factors such as resource use, pollution, and the effects of AM on human health and society should be also taken into account before determining its environmental impact. In addition, in powder-based AM, handling the powder becomes an issue to be addressed, considering both the operator´s health and the subsequent management of the powder used. In view of these requirements, the fundamentals of the different powder-based AM processes were studied and special attention paid to the health risks derived from the high concentrations of certain chemical compounds existing in the typically employed materials. A review of previous work related to the environmental impact of AM is presented, highlighting the gaps found and the areas where deeper research is required. Finally, the implications of the reuse of metallic powder and the procedures to be followed for the disposal of waste are studied.

Additive Manufacturing Processes for Infrastructure Construction: A Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Bhardwaj ◽  
Scott Z. Jones ◽  
Negar Kalantar ◽  
Zhijian Pei ◽  
John Vickers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Construction Industry ◽  
Manufacturing Sector ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Current State ◽  
Industry Applications ◽  
Am Processes

Additive manufacturing (AM) has had an enormous impact on the manufacturing sector. Its role has evolved from printing prototypes to manufacturing functional parts for a variety of applications in the automotive, aerospace, and medical industries. Recently, AM processes have also been applied in the infrastructure construction industry. Applications of AM processes could bring in significant improvements in infrastructure construction, specifically in the areas of productivity and safety. It is desirable to have a review on the current state of emerging AM processes for infrastructure construction and existing gaps in this field. This paper reviews the AM processes in infrastructure construction. It discusses the process principle, application examples, and gaps for each of the AM processes.

scholarly journals Design of Additively Manufactured Structures for Biomedical Applications: A Review of the Additive Manufacturing Processes Applied to the Biomedical Sector

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flaviana Calignano ◽  
Manuela Galati ◽  
Luca Iuliano ◽  
Paolo Minetola
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Biomedical Applications ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Disruptive Technology ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Medical Field ◽  
Successful Case ◽  
Design Perspective ◽  
Manufacturing Techniques ◽  
Am Processes

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a disruptive technology as it pushes the frontier of manufacturing towards a new design perspective, such as the ability to shape geometries that cannot be formed with any other traditional technique. AM has today shown successful applications in several fields such as the biomedical sector in which it provides a relatively fast and effective way to solve even complex medical cases. From this point of view, the purpose of this paper is to illustrate AM technologies currently used in the medical field and their benefits along with contemporary. The review highlights differences in processes, materials, and design of additive manufacturing techniques used in biomedical applications. Successful case studies are presented to emphasise the potentiality of AM processes. The presented review supports improvements in materials and design for future researches in biomedical surgeries using instruments and implants made by AM.

Consideration of the Manufacturing Trajectories in a Global Design for Additive Manufacturing Methodology

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Ponche ◽  
O. Kerbrat ◽  
P. Mognol ◽  
J. Y. Hascoet
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Cost Reduction ◽  
Design Problem ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Direct Impact ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Physical Phenomena ◽  
Am Processes

Additive Manufacturing (AM) is a new way of part production which opens up new perspectives of conception as mass and cost reduction and increase of functionalities. However these processes have their own characteristics which as for all the manufacturing processes have a direct impact on the manufactured parts quality. Especially, because the manufacturing trajectories have a influence on the physical phenomena during the process, they have also a strong impact on the quality of the produced parts in terms of geometry. In this paper, the choice of manufacturing trajectories and their impacts on the final shape and quality of the parts is integrated into a global Design For Additive Manufacturing (DFAM) methodology which allows to move from functional specifications of a design problem to a proposition of an adapted part for AM processes.

Review: Dimensional Accuracy in Additive Manufacturing Processes

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pil-Ho Lee ◽  
Haseung Chung ◽  
Sang Won Lee ◽  
Jeongkon Yoo ◽  
Jeonghan Ko
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
The State ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Accuracy Improvement ◽  
Process Characteristics ◽  
Art Research ◽  
Am Processes

This paper reviews the state-of-the-art research related to the dimensional accuracy in additive manufacturing (AM) processes. It is considered that the improvement of dimensional accuracy is one of the major scientific challenges to enhance the qualities of the products by AM. This paper analyzed the studies for commonly used AM techniques with respect to dimensional accuracy. These studies are classified by process characteristics, and relevant accuracy issues are examined. The accuracies of commercial AM machines are also listed. This paper also discusses suggestions for accuracy improvement. With the increase of the dimensional accuracy, not only the application of AM processes will diversify but also their value will increase.

scholarly journals Analysis and characterization of additive manufacturing processes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-180
Author(s):  
Andra TOFAN-NEGRU ◽  
Cristian BARBU ◽  
Amado STEFAN ◽  
Ioana-Carmen BOGLIS
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Complex Geometry ◽  
Cutting Tools ◽  
Manufacturing Processes ◽  
Layer By Layer ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Finishing Processes ◽  
Short Time ◽  
Physical Phenomena ◽  
Am Processes

Recently, additive manufacturing (AM) processes have expanded rapidly in various fields of the industry because they offer design freedom, involve layer-by-layer construction from a computerized 3D model (minimizing material consumption), and allow the manufacture of parts with complex geometry (thus offering the possibility of producing custom parts). Also, they provide the advantage of a short time to make the final parts, do not involve the need for auxiliary resources (cutting tools, lighting fixtures or coolants) and have a low impact on the environment. However, the aspects that make these technologies not yet widely used in industry are poor surface quality of parts, uncertainty about the mechanical properties of products and low productivity. Research on the physical phenomena associated with additive manufacturing processes is necessary for proper control of the phenomena of melting, solidification, vaporization and heat transfer. This paper addresses the relevant additive manufacturing processes and their applications and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of AM processes compared to conventional production processes. For the aerospace industry, these technologies offer possibilities for manufacturing lighter structures to reduce weight, but improvements in precision must be sought to eliminate the need for finishing processes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document