Evidence-Based Structural Uncertainty Quantification by Dimension Reduction Decomposition and Marginal Interval Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lixiong Cao ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Chao Jiang ◽  
Zhantao Wu ◽  
Zheng Zhang

Abstract Evidence theory has the powerful feature to quantify epistemic uncertainty. However, the huge computational cost has become the main obstacle of evidence theory on engineering applications. In this paper, an efficient uncertainty quantification (UQ) method based on dimension reduction decomposition is proposed to improve the applicability of evidence theory. In evidence-based UQ, the extremum analysis is required for each joint focal element, which generally can be achieved by collocating a large number of nodes. Through dimension reduction decomposition, the response of any point can be predicted by the responses of corresponding marginal collocation nodes. Thus, a marginal collocation node method is proposed to avoid the call of original performance function at all joint collocation nodes in extremum analysis. Based on this, a marginal interval analysis method is further developed to decompose the multidimensional extremum searches for all joint focal elements into the combination of a few one-dimensional extremum searches. Because it overcomes the combinatorial explosion of computation caused by dimension, this proposed method can significantly improve the computational efficiency for evidence-based UQ, especially for the high-dimensional uncertainty problems. In each one-dimensional extremum search, as the response at each marginal collocation node is actually calculated by using the original performance function, the proposed method can provide a relatively precise result by collocating marginal nodes even for some nonlinear functions. The accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method are demonstrated by three numerical examples and two engineering applications.

2011 ◽  
Vol 314-316 ◽  
pp. 2569-2573
Author(s):  
Yan Ming Xiong ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Shi Ling Li ◽  
Zhan Ping Yang

A novel interval analysis method of fault tree is proposed. Evidence theory is applied to calculate the interval probability of basic events. Convex model is applied to structure the interval operators for interval analysis, and Monte-Carlo simulation method is used to calculate conditional extreme. Simulation result demonstrates that the proposed method is coinciding with the practical applications very well, and can be applied when statistical data are incomplete.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley D. Scillitoe ◽  
Chun Yui Wong ◽  
James C. Gross ◽  
Irene Virdis ◽  
Bryn N. Ubald ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh-Quyet Ha ◽  
Nguyen-Duong Nguyen ◽  
Viet-Cuong Nguyen ◽  
Takahiro Nagata ◽  
Toyohiro Chikyow ◽  
...  

Abstract We present a data-driven approach to explore high-entropy alloys (HEAs). To overcome the challenges with numerous element-combination candidates, selecting appropriate descriptors, and the limitations and biased of existing data, we apply the evidence theory to develop a descriptor-free evidence-based recommender system (ERS) for recommending HEAs. The proposed system measures the similarities between element combinations and utilizes it to recommend potential HEAs. To evaluate the ERS, we compare its HEA-recommendation capability with those of matrix-factorization- and supervised-learning-based recommender systems on four widely known data sets, including binary and ternary alloys. The results of experiments using k-fold cross-validation on the data sets show that the ERS outperforms all competitors. Furthermore, the ERS shows excellent extrapolation capabilities in experiments of recommending quaternary and quinary HEAs. We experimentally validate the most strongly recommended Fe-Co-based magnetic HEA, viz. FeCoMnNi, and confirm that it shows a body-centered cubic structure and is stable at high temperatures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 475 ◽  
pp. 115258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai B. Huang ◽  
Jiu H. Wu ◽  
Xiao R. Huang ◽  
Wei P. Ding ◽  
Ming L. Yang

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 762
Author(s):  
Shuai Yuan ◽  
Honglei Wang

In a multi-sensor system, due to the difference of performance of sensors and the environment in which the sensor collects evidence, evidence collected will be highly conflicting, which leads to the failure of D-S evidence theory. The current research on combination methods of conflicting evidence focuses on eliminating the problem of "Zadeh paradox" brought by conflicting evidence, but do not distinguish the evidence from different sources effectively. In this paper, the credibility of each piece of evidence to be combined is weighted based on historical data, and the modified evidence is obtained by weighted average. Then the final result is obtained by combining the modified evidence using D-S evidence theory, and the improved decision rule is used for the final decision. After the decision, the system updates and stores the historical data based on actual results. The improved decision rule can solve the problem that the system cannot make a decision when there are two or more propositions corresponding to the maximum support in the final combination result. This method satisfies commutative law and associative law, so it has the symmetry that can meet the needs of the combination of time-domain evidence. Numerical examples show that the combination method of conflict evidence based on historical data can not only solve the problem of “Zadeh paradox”, but also obtain more reasonable results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document