Data-Driven Design Space Exploration and Exploitation for Design for Additive Manufacturing

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Xiong ◽  
Pham Luu Trung Duong ◽  
Dong Wang ◽  
Sang-In Park ◽  
Qi Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Design Space ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Detailed Design ◽  
Embodiment Design ◽  
Ankle Brace

Recently, design for additive manufacturing has been proposed to maximize product performance through the rational and integrated design of the product, its materials, and their manufacturing processes. Searching design solutions in such a multidimensional design space is a challenging task. Notably, no existing design support method is both rapid and tailored to the design process. In this study, we propose a holistic approach that applies data-driven methods in design search and optimization at successive stages of a design process. More specifically, a two-step surrogate model-based design method is proposed for the embodiment and detailed design stages. The Bayesian network classifier is used as the reasoning framework to explore the design space in the embodiment design stage, while the Gaussian process regression model is used as the evaluation function for an optimization method to exploit the design space in detailed design. These models are constructed based on one dataset that is created by the Latin hypercube sampling method and then refined by the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling method. This cost-effective data-driven approach is demonstrated in the design of a customized ankle brace that has a tunable mechanical performance by using a highly stretchable design concept with tailored stiffnesses.

An Innovative Channel Design of the Freezing Chucker

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong-Yuan Jou
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Design ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Plate Surface ◽  
Channel Design ◽  
Typical Structure ◽  
Design Work ◽  
Detailed Design ◽  
Embodiment Design ◽  
Final Design

A freezing chucker is a clamp-less mechanism of fixture for easy broken egg-shell, clay, and other ferrous/nonferrous materials. Typical structure of this mechanism includes a top plate for freezing workpieces, a body with specially designed channels for the coolant flows, and a bottom plate to fasten on the table of other machine. Just by a small amount of liquids on the top surface and by rapidly cool down to 253K, parts can be frozen stationary on the top plate surface and can conduct precision machining on it. There are four steps to design a new freeze chucker by the engineering design process: planning and clarifying the task; conceptual design; embodiment design; detailed design. Some useful tools from the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) technique and the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) method are used in this design process. Eight concept designs are generated by the conceptual design work and the final design of channel with transverse ribs is selected by decision matrix technique during embodiment design and detailed design stage. This final design is evaluated by numerical modeling of the COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS 3.2 finite-element based package. Performances such as the temperature distribution of top-plate surface temperature and the lowest temperature of a freezing chucker are shown. Numerical results show the success of the innovative channel design by this inventive design process using TRIZ methodology.

scholarly journals REVIEW OF DESIGN HEURISTICS AND DESIGN PRINCIPLES IN DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2571-2580
Author(s):  
Filip Valjak ◽  
Angelica Lindwall
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Design Principles ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Heuristics ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Support Methods

AbstractThe advent of additive manufacturing (AM) in recent years have had a significant impact on the design process. Because of new manufacturing technology, a new area of research emerged – Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) with newly developed design support methods and tools. This paper looks into the current status of the field regarding the conceptual design of AM products, with the focus on how literature sources treat design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM. To answer the research question, a systematic literature review was conducted. The results are analysed, compared and discussed on three main points: the definition of the design heuristics and the design principles, level of support they provide, as well as where and how they are used inside the design process. The paper highlights the similarities and differences between design heuristics and design principles in the context of DfAM.

scholarly journals An Optimization Workflow in Design for Additive Manufacturing

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2572
Author(s):  
Stefano Rosso ◽  
Federico Uriati ◽  
Luca Grigolato ◽  
Roberto Meneghello ◽  
Gianmaria Concheri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Structural Optimization ◽  
Geometric Model ◽  
Complex Geometries ◽  
Design Phase ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Engineering Software ◽  
Embodiment Design ◽  
Pros And Cons

Additive Manufacturing (AM) brought a revolution in parts design and production. It enables the possibility to obtain objects with complex geometries and to exploit structural optimization algorithms. Nevertheless, AM is far from being a mature technology and advances are still needed from different perspectives. Among these, the literature highlights the need of improving the frameworks that describe the design process and taking full advantage of the possibilities offered by AM. This work aims to propose a workflow for AM guiding the designer during the embodiment design phase, from the engineering requirements to the production of the final part. The main aspects are the optimization of the dimensions and the topology of the parts, to take into consideration functional and manufacturing requirements, and to validate the geometric model by computer-aided engineering software. Moreover, a case study dealing with the redesign of a piston rod is presented, in which the proposed workflow is adopted. Results show the effectiveness of the workflow when applied to cases in which structural optimization could bring an advantage in the design of a part and the pros and cons of the choices made during the design phases were highlighted.

Design for Additive Manufacturing in the Cloud Platform

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanbin Wang ◽  
Robert Blache ◽  
Xun Xu
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Management ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Full Advantage ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Cloud Platform ◽  
Am Processes

Additive manufacturing (AM) has experienced a phenomenal expansion in recent years and new technologies and materials rapidly emerge in the market. Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) becomes more and more important to take full advantage of the capabilities provided by AM. However, most people still have limited knowledge to make informed decisions in the design stage. Therefore, an interactive DfAM system in the cloud platform is proposed to enable people sharing the knowledge in this field and guide the designers to utilize AM efficiently. There are two major modules in the system, decision support module and knowledge management module. A case study is presented to illustrate how this system can help the designers understand the capabilities of AM processes and make rational decisions.

scholarly journals Detailed design process and assembly considerations for snap-fit joints using additive manufacturing

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 680-687
Author(s):  
Jorge Luis Amaya ◽  
Emilio A. Ramírez ◽  
Galarza F. Maldonado ◽  
Jorge Hurel
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Detailed Design

scholarly journals An additive manufacturing oriented design approach to mechanical assemblies

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Germain Sossou ◽  
Frédéric Demoly ◽  
Ghislain Montavon ◽  
Samuel Gomes
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Mechanical Assembly ◽  
Build Orientation ◽  
Assembly Design ◽  
Conventional Design ◽  
Downstream Processes ◽  
Assembly Operations

Abstract Firstly introduced as a prototyping process, additive manufacturing (AM) is being more and more considered as a fully-edged manufacturing process. The number of AM processes, along with the range of processed materials are expanding. AM has made manufacturable shapes that were too difficult (or even impossible) to manufacture with conventional technologies. This has promoted a shift in engineering design, from conventional design for manufacturing and assembly to design for additive manufacturing (DFAM). Research efforts into the DFAM field have been mostly dedicated to part's design, which is actually a requirement for a better industrial adoption. This has given rise to topologically optimized and/or latticed designs. However, since AM is also capable of manufacturing fully functional assemblies requiring a few or no assembly operations, there is a need for DFAM methodologies tackling product's development more holistically, and which are, therefore, dedicated to assembly design. Considering all the manufacturing issues related to AM of assembly-free mechanisms and available post-processing capabilities, this paper proposes a top-down assembly design methodology for AM in a proactive manner. Such an approach, can be seen as the beginning of a shift from conventional design for assembly (DFA) to a new paradigm. From a product's concept and a selected AM technology, the approach first provides assistance in the definition of the product architecture so that both functionality and successful manufacturing (including post-processing) are ensured. Particularly, build-orientation and downstream processes' characteristics are taken into account early in the design process. Secondly, for the functional flow (energy, material, signal) to be appropriately conveyed by the right amount of matter, the methodology provides guidance into how the components can be designed in a minimalism fashion leveraging the shape complexity afforded by AM. A mechanical assembly as case study is presented to illustrate the DFAM methodology. It is found that clearances and material (be it raw unprocessed material or support structures) within them plays a pivotal role in a successful assembly's design to be additively manufactured. In addition, the methodology for components' design proves to be an efficient alternative to topology optimization. Though, the approach can be extended by considering a strategy for part consolidation and the possibility to manufacture the assemblies with more than one AM process. As regards components' design, considering anisotropy can also improved the approach. Highlights Additive manufacturing is capable of printing fully functional assemblies without any assembly operations. It is found that Design For Additive Manufacturing is currently mainly focused on part's design. A process-independent, structured and systematic method for designing assembly-free mechanisms (for AM) is proposed. Build orientation and downstream processes (including post-processing capabilities) are taken into account early in the design process. A method - based on functional flows - for part's design in a minimalist fashion, is proposed.

Impact of Timing in the Design Process on Students' Application of Design for Additive Manufacturing Heuristics

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-56
Author(s):  
Anastasia Schauer ◽  
Kenton Fillingim ◽  
Katherine Fu
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Design Activity ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Design Heuristics ◽  
Traditional Manufacturing ◽  
The Way

Abstract The goal of this work is to study the way student designers use design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) rules, or heuristics. It can be challenging for novice designers to succeed at creating successful designs for additive manufacturing (AM), given its differences from traditional manufacturing methods. A study was carried out to investigate the way novices apply DfAM heuristics when they receive them at different points in the design process. A design problem was presented to students, and three different groups of student participants were given a lecture on DfAM heuristics at three different points in the design process. The novelty and quality of each of the resulting designs was evaluated. Results indicate that although the DfAM heuristics lecture had no impact on the overall quality of the designs generated, participants who were given the heuristics lecture after the initial design session produced designs that were better suited for 3D printing in the second phase of the design activity. However, receiving this additional information appears to prevent students from creatively iterating upon their initial designs, as participants in this group did not experience an increase in novelty between the two sessions. Additionally, receiving the heuristics lecture increased all students' perceptions of their ability to perform DfAM-related tasks. These results validate the practicality of design heuristics as AM training tools while also emphasizing the importance of iteration in the design process.

Relative Design Cost Estimation at Design Stage Based on Design Features

2010 ◽  
Vol 26-28 ◽  
pp. 625-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Chuan Chen ◽  
Xiao Xia Lai ◽  
John. K. Gershenson
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Cost Estimation ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Design Features ◽  
Embodiment Design ◽  
Relative Design ◽  
The Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Design Cost ◽  
Design Factors

With the global financial crisis happened, companies and investors pay more attention to development expense. Development costs mainly include design cost at the design stage. We analyze the design process and extract many design factors in order to estimate design cost at the conceptual and embodiment design stage. A number of process-based design features that impact the design cost are considered. These design factors include: 1) the number of performances and constraints, 2) sub-functions level and relationships, and 3) solutions at the conceptual design stage. At the embodiment of the design stage the design factors include: 1) the number of parts and their relationships, 2) the types of materials, 3) load resources, and 4) the number and types of tolerances. We use relative cost to estimate design cost by comparing the number of design factors among designs. To demonstrate the relative design cost estimation in practice, Kodak single-use cameras are used as example products. Use of these methods proves beneficial in estimate design cost in the design process.

scholarly journals INVESTIGATING PERCEIVED MEANINGS AND SCOPES OF DESIGN FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1937-1946
Author(s):  
Aurora Berni ◽  
Yuri Borgianni ◽  
Martins Obi ◽  
Patrick Pradel ◽  
Richard Bibb
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Design For Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Hands On ◽  
The Future

AbstractThe concept of Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) is gaining popularity along with AM, despite its scopes are not well established. In particular, in the last few years, DfAM methods have been intuitively subdivided into opportunistic and restrictive. This distinction is gaining traction despite a lack of formalization. In this context, the paper investigates experts' understanding of DfAM. In particular, the authors have targeted educators, as the perception of DfAM scopes in the future will likely depend on teachers' view. A bespoke survey has been launched, which has been answer by 100 worldwide-distributed respondents. The gathered data has undergone several analyses, markedly answers to open questions asking for individual definitions of DfAM, and evaluations of the pertinence of meanings and acceptations from the literature. The results show that the main DfAM aspects focused on by first standardization attempts have been targeted, especially products, processes, opportunities and constraints. Beyond opportunistic and restrictive nuances, DfAM different understandings are characterized by different extents of cognitive endeavor, convergence vs. divergence in the design process, theoretical vs. hands on approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document