A Review on Compliant Joints and Rigid-Body Constant Velocity Universal Joints Toward the Design of Compliant Homokinetic Couplings

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Farhadi Machekposhti ◽  
N. Tolou ◽  
J. L. Herder

This paper presents for the first time a literature survey toward the design of compliant homokinetic couplings. The rigid-linkage-based constant velocity universal joints (CV joints) available from literature were studied, classified, their graph representations were presented, and their mechanical efficiencies compared. Similarly, literature is reviewed for different kinds of compliant joints suitable to replace instead of rigid-body joints in rigid-body CV joints. The compliant joints are compared based on analytical data. To provide a common basis for comparison, consistent flexure scales and material selection are used. It was found that existing compliant universal joints are nonconstant in velocity and designed based on rigid-body Hooke's universal joint. It was also discovered that no compliant equivalent exists for cylindrical, planar, spherical fork, and spherical parallelogram quadrilateral joints. We have demonstrated these compliant joints can be designed by combining existing compliant joints. The universal joints found in this survey are rigid-body non-CV joints, rigid-body CV joints, or compliant non-CV joints. A compliant homokinetic coupling is expected to combine the advantages of compliant mechanisms and constant velocity couplings for many applications where maintenance or cleanliness is important, for instance in medical devices and precision instruments.

Author(s):  
Davood Farhadi Machekposhti ◽  
N. Tolou ◽  
J. L. Herder

Many applications require a compliant mechanism to transmit rotation from one direct to another direct with constant velocity. This paper presents a literature survey towards the design of compliant constant velocity universal joints. The traditional constant velocity universal joints available from the literature were studied, classified and their mechanical efficiencies were compared. Also the graph representation of them was studied. In the same manner, literature review for different kind of compliant joints suitable for the Rigid-Body-Replacement of constant velocity universal joints was also performed. For the first time a comparison with analytical data of compliant joints was performed. All of compliant universal joints are non-constant velocity and designed based on rigid Hooke’s universal joint. Also we show there are no equivalent compliant joints for some rigid-body joints such as cylindrical joint, planar joint, spherical fork joint and spherical parallelogram quadrilateral joint. However, we may achieve them by combining numbers of available compliant joints. The universal joints found are non-compliant non-constant velocity universal joint, non-compliant constant velocity universal joint or compliant non-constant velocity universal joint. A compliant constant velocity universal joint has a great horizon for developments, for instance in medical or rehabilitation devices.


Author(s):  
Larry L. Howell ◽  
Ashok Midha

Abstract Compliant mechanisms gain some or all of their mobility from the flexibility of their members rather than from rigid-body joints only. More efficient and usable analysis and design techniques are needed before the advantages of compliant mechanisms can be fully utilized. In an earlier work, a pseudo-rigid-body model concept, corresponding to an end-loaded geometrically nonlinear, large-deflection beam, was developed to help fulfill this need. In this paper, the pseudo-rigid-body equivalent spring stiffness is investigated and new modeling equations are proposed. The result is a simplified method of modeling the force/deflection relationships of large-deflection members in compliant mechanisms. Flexible segments which maintain a constant end angle are discussed, and an example mechanism is analyzed. The resulting models are valuable in the visualization of the motion of large-deflection systems, as well as the quick and efficient evaluation and optimization of compliant mechanism designs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujitkumar V. Naik ◽  
Anupam Saxena ◽  
Ashok Kumar Rai ◽  
B. V. S. Nagendra Reddy

Partially compliant mechanisms inherit the attributes of fully compliant and rigid-body linkages and offer simpler, compact design alternatives to accomplish complex kinematic tasks such as tracing large nonsmooth paths. This paper describes qualitative and quantitative criteria that can be employed to select the linkage configuration. The proposed criteria are categorized as general or specific. General criteria pertain to often-used kinematic attributes whereas specific criteria address the application at hand. The veracity and viability of each mechanism are evaluated with respect to compactness, design simplicity, static and dynamic failure, number of rigid-body joints, relative ease of fabrication, and other relevant criteria. Three decision-making techniques, namely, Pugh decision matrix, analytic hierarchy process, and a variant of the Pugh decision matrix are used to perform the evaluation. An example of a displacement-delimited gripper with a prescribed large nonsmooth path is used to illustrate linkage selection.


1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 280-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Howell ◽  
A. Midha

Compliant or flexible-link mechanisms gain some or all of their motion from the relative flexibility of their joints rather than from rigid-body joints only. Unlike rigid-body mechanisms, energy is not conserved between the input and output ports of compliant mechanisms because of energy storage in the flexible members. This effect and the nonlinearities introduced by large deflections complicate the analysis of such mechanisms. The design of compliant mechanisms in industry is currently accomplished by expensive trial and error methods. This paper introduces a method to aid in the design of a class of compliant mechanisms wherein the flexible sections (flexural pivots) are small in length compared to the relatively rigid sections. The method includes a definition and use of a pseudo-rigid-body model, and the use of a large-deflection finite element type algorithm. An example is used to illustrate the design technique described.


Author(s):  
Ashok Midha ◽  
Tony W. Norton ◽  
Larry L. Howell

Abstract Compliant mechanisms gain some or all of their mobility from the flexibility of their members rather than from rigid-body joints only. Compliant mechanisms are desirable since they require fewer parts, and have less wear, noise, and backlash than their rigid-body counterpart mechanisms. The field of compliant mechanisms is important, and is expected to continue to grow as materials with superior properties are developed. Inasmuch as evolution of efficient design techniques is viewed as essential research activity, a parallel, systematic development of appropriate vocabulary (nomenclature, classification, etc.) is of primary importance. This paper proposes standard nomenclature for the components of compliant mechanisms and discusses the relevant issues involved in this process. Definitions for components, such as “links” and “joints,” remove ambiguity that has been associated with these terms in the past. A concerted effort is made to be consistent with current literature on both rigid-body mechanisms and compliant mechanisms whenever possible.


1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Howell ◽  
A. Midha ◽  
T. W. Norton

Compliant mechanisms gain some or all of their mobility from the flexibility of their members rather than from rigid-body joints only. More efficient and usable analysis and design techniques are needed before the advantages of compliant mechanisms can be fully utilized. In an earlier work, a pseudo-rigid-body model concept, corresponding to an end-loaded geometrically nonlinear, large-deflection beam, was developed to help fulfill this need. In this paper, the pseudo-rigid-body equivalent spring stiffness is investigated and new modeling equations are proposed. The result is a simplified method of modeling the force/deflection relationships of large-deflection members in compliant mechanisms. The resulting models are valuable in the visualization of the motion of large-deflection systems, as well as the quick and efficient evaluation and optimization of compliant mechanism designs.


Author(s):  
Ashok Midha ◽  
Tony W. Norton ◽  
Larry L. Howell

Abstract A compliant mechanism is one which gains all or part of its mobility from the relative flexibility of its members rather than from rigid-body joints only. Compliant mechanisms offer clear advantages, such as need for fewer parts, less wear, noise and backlash due to clearances, when compared to rigid-body mechanisms performing similar functions. This important field is expected to undergo significant growth as materials with superior properties are developed. In the development of compliant mechanisms, the establishment of nomenclature and classification is of primary importance. This paper discusses common representations, i.e. names and diagrams, for a compliant mechanism. Names and diagrams will be shown to be similar because they represent “abstractions” of the same mechanism. The concept of “levels of abstraction” is introduced, and common levels of abstraction are identified. The relevance of this concept to the naming of mechanisms is shown by applying it to both rigid-body and compliant mechanism examples. Nomenclature is proposed for several of the common levels of abstraction, and issues involved in naming mechanisms are discussed. Finally, a discussion of synthesis types is presented, as are the advantages, disadvantages, and issues involved in the synthesis of a compliant mechanism.


2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Cao ◽  
Allan T. Dolovich ◽  
Arend L. Schwab ◽  
Just L. Herder ◽  
Wenjun (Chris) Zhang

Rigid-body mechanisms (RBMs) and compliant mechanisms (CMs) are traditionally treated in significantly different ways. In this paper, we present a synthesis approach that is appropriate for both RBMs and CMs. In this approach, RBMs and CMs are generalized into modularized mechanisms that consist of five basic modules, including compliant links (CLs), rigid links (RLs), pin joints (PJs), compliant joints (CJs), and rigid joints (RJs). The link modules and joint modules are modeled through beam elements and hinge elements, respectively, in a geometrically nonlinear finite-element solver, and subsequently a beam-hinge ground structure model is proposed. Based on this new model, a link and joint determination approach—module optimization—is developed for the type and dimensional synthesis of both RBMs and CMs. In the module optimization approach, the states (both presence or absence and sizes) of joints and links are all design variables, and one may obtain an RBM, a partially CM, or a fully CM for a given mechanical task. Three design examples of path generators are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach to the type and dimensional synthesis of RBMs and CMs.


Author(s):  
Guimin Chen ◽  
Shouyin Zhang

Although there are many examples of multistable compliant mechanisms in the literature, most of them are of planar configurations. Considering that a multistable mechanism providing spatial motion could be useful in numerous applications, this paper explores the multistable behavior of the overconstrained spatial Sarrus mechanisms with compliant joints (CSMs). The kinetostatics of CSMs have been formulated based on the pseudo-rigid-body method. The kinetostatic results show that a CSM is capable of exhibiting bistability, tristability, and quadristability. Possible applications of multistable CSMs include deployable structures, static balancing of human/robot bodies and weight compensators.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Calogero ◽  
Mary Frecker ◽  
Zohaib Hasnain ◽  
James E. Hubbard

A method for validating rigid-body models of compliant mechanisms under dynamic loading conditions using motion tracking cameras and genetic algorithms is presented. The compliant mechanisms are modeled using rigid-body mechanics as compliant joints (CJ): spherical joints with distributed mass and three-axis torsional spring dampers. This allows compliant mechanisms to be modeled using computationally efficient rigid-body dynamics methods, thereby allowing a model to determine the desired stiffness and location characteristics of compliant mechanisms spatially distributed into a structure. An experiment was performed to validate a previously developed numerical dynamics model with the goal of tuning unknown model parameters to match the flapping kinematics of the leading edge spar of an ornithopter with contact-aided compliant mechanisms (CCMs), compliant mechanisms that feature self-contact to produce nonlinear stiffness, inserted. A system of computer motion tracking cameras was used to record the kinematics of reflective tape and markers placed along the leading edge spar with and without CCMs inserted. A genetic algorithm was used to minimize the error between the model and experimental marker kinematics. The model was able to match the kinematics of all markers along the spars with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of less than 2% of the half wingspan over the flapping cycle. Additionally, the model was able to capture the deflection amplitude and harmonics of the CCMs with a RMSE of less than 2 deg over the flapping cycle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document