P3GA: An Algorithm for Technology Characterization

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Galvan ◽  
Richard J. Malak

It is important for engineers to understand the capabilities and limitations of the technologies they consider for use in their systems. However, communicating this information can be a challenge. Mathematical characterizations of technical capabilities are of interest as a means to reduce ambiguity in communication and to increase opportunities to utilize design automation methods. The parameterized Pareto frontier (PPF) was introduced in prior work as a mathematical basis for modeling technical capabilities. One advantage of PPFs is that, in many cases, engineers can model a system by composing frontiers of its components. This allows for rapid technology evaluation and design space exploration. However, finding the PPF can be difficult. The contribution of this article is a new algorithm for approximating the PPF, called predictive parameterized Pareto genetic algorithm (P3GA). The proposed algorithm uses concepts and methods from multi-objective genetic optimization and machine learning to generate a discrete approximation of the PPF. If needed, designers can generate a continuous approximation of the frontier by generalizing beyond these data. The algorithm is explained, its performance is analyzed on numerical test problems, and its use is demonstrated on an engineering example. The results of the investigation indicate that P3GA may be effective in practice.

Author(s):  
Marcio Ferreira da Silva Oliveira ◽  
Marco Aurelio Wehrmeister ◽  
Francisco Assis do Nascimento ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Pereira

Modern embedded systems have increased their functionality by using a large amount and diversity of hardware and software components. Realizing the expected system functionality is a complex task. Such complexity must be managed in order to decrease time-to-market and increase system quality. This chapter presents a method for high-level design space exploration (DSE) of embedded systems that uses model-driven engineering (MDE) and aspect-oriented design (AOD) approaches. The modelling style and the abstraction level open new design automation and optimization opportunities, thus improving the overall results. Furthermore, the proposed method achieves better reusability, complexity management, and design automation by exploiting both MDE and AOD approaches. Preliminary results regarding the use of the proposed method are presented.


Author(s):  
Shane K. Curtis ◽  
Braden J. Hancock ◽  
Christopher A. Mattson

In a recent publication, we presented a new strategy for engineering design and optimization, which we termed formulation space exploration. The formulation space for an optimization problem is the union of all variable and design objective spaces identified by the designer as being valid and pragmatic problem formulations. By extending a computational search into this new space, the solution to any optimization problem is no longer predefined by the optimization problem formulation. This method allows a designer to both diverge the design space during conceptual design and converge onto a solution as more information about the design objectives and constraints becomes available. Additionally, we introduced a new way to formulate multiobjective optimization problems, allowing the designer to change and update design objectives, constraints, and variables in a simple, fluid manner that promotes exploration. In this paper, we investigate three use scenarios where formulation space exploration can be utilized in the early stages of design when it is possible to make the greatest contributions to development projects. Specifically, we look at s-Pareto frontier generation in the formulation space, formulation space boundary exploration, and a new way to perform inverse optimization. The benefits of these methods are illustrated with the conceptual design of an impact driver.


Author(s):  
Adrian G. Caburnay ◽  
Jonathan Gabriel S.A. Reyes ◽  
Anastacia P. Ballesil-Alvarez ◽  
Maria Theresa G. de Leon ◽  
John Richard E. Hizon ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (5s) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Fong ◽  
Vivek J. Srinivasan ◽  
Kourosh Vali ◽  
Soheil Ghiasi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document