End Wall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring—Part II: Validation

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Sangston ◽  
Jesse Little ◽  
M. Eric Lyall ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wall Loss ◽  
Wall Flow ◽  
End Wall ◽  
Stagger Angle

The hypothesis, posed in Part I, that excessive end wall loss of high lift low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoils is due to the influence of high stagger angles on the end wall pressure distribution and not front loading is evaluated in a linear cascade at Re = 100,000 using both experimental and computational studies. A nominally high lift and high stagger angle front-loaded profile (L2F) with aspect ratio 3.5 is contoured at the end wall to reduce the stagger angle while maintaining the front loading. The contouring process effectively generates a fillet at the end wall, so the resulting airfoil is referred to as L2F-EF (end wall fillet). Although referred to as a fillet, this profile contouring process is novel in that it is designed to isolate the effect of stagger angle on end wall loss. Total pressure loss measurements downstream of the blade row indicate that the use of the lower stagger angle at the end wall reduces mixed out mass averaged end wall and passage losses approximately 23% and 10%, respectively. This is in good agreement with computational results used to design the contour which predict 18% and 7% loss reductions. The end wall flow field of the L2F and L2F-EF models is measured using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) in the passage. These data are used to quantify changes in the end wall flow field due to the contouring. PIV results show that this loss reduction is characterized by reduced inlet boundary layer separation as well as a change in strength and location of the suction side horseshoe vortex (SHV) and passage vortex (PV). The end wall profile contouring also produces a reduction in all terms of the Reynolds stress tensor consistent with a decrease in deformation work and overall flow unsteadiness. These results confirm that the stagger angle has a significant effect on high-lift front-loaded LPT end wall loss. Low stagger profiling is successful in reducing end wall loss by limiting the development and migration of the low momentum fluid associated with the SHV and PV interaction.

Endwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring: Part II — Validation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Sangston ◽  
Jesse Little ◽  
M. Eric Lyall ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Suction Side ◽  
Boundary Layer Separation ◽  
Horseshoe Vortex ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Stagger Angle

The hypothesis, posed in Part I [1], that excessive endwall loss of high lift low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoils is due to the influence of high stagger angles on the endwall pressure distribution and not front-loading is evaluated in a linear cascade at Re = 100,000 using both experimental and computational studies. A nominally high lift and high stagger angle front-loaded profile (L2F) with aspect ratio 3.5 is contoured at the endwall to reduce the stagger angle while maintaining the front loading. The contouring process effectively generates a fillet at the endwall, so the resulting airfoil is referred to as L2F-EF (Endwall Fillet). Although referred to as a fillet, this profile contouring process is novel in that it is designed to isolate the effect of stagger angle on endwall loss. Total pressure loss measurements downstream of the blade row indicate that the use of the lower stagger angle at the endwall reduces mixed out mass averaged endwall and passage losses approximately 23% and 10% respectively. This is in good agreement with computational results used to design the contour which predict 18% and 7% loss reductions. The endwall flow field of the L2F and L2F-EF models is measured using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) in the passage. These data are used to quantify changes in the endwall flow field due to the contouring. PIV results show that this loss reduction is characterized by reduced inlet boundary layer separation as well as a change in strength and location of the suction side horseshoe vortex (SHV) and passage vortex (PV). The endwall profile contouring also produces a reduction in all terms of the Reynolds stress tensor consistent with a decrease in deformation work and overall flow unsteadiness. These results confirm that the stagger angle has a significant effect on high-lift front-loaded LPT endwall loss. Low stagger profiling is successful in reducing endwall loss by limiting the development and migration of the low momentum fluid associated with the SHV and PV interaction.

Endwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring—Part I: Airfoil Design

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Eric Lyall ◽  
Paul I. King ◽  
John P. Clark ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Linear Cascade ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Turbine Airfoils ◽  
Stagger Angle

This paper presents the reasoning for and the design process of contouring a high lift front-loaded low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoil near the endwall to reduce the endwall loss. The test airfoil, L2F, was designed to the approximate gas angles with 38% larger pitchwise spacing than the widely studied Pack B airfoil. Being more front-loaded with a higher stagger angle, L2F is shown to produce more endwall losses than Pack B. It is suggested that the high endwall loss of L2F is due to the high stagger angle, not front-loading, as usually suggested in the literature. A procedure is presented to approximate the front-loading and stall resistance of L2F and obtain a low stagger version of that airfoil, designated as L2F-LS. A contoured airfoil is then designed by transitioning L2F into L2F-LS at the endwall to obtain a benefit from the reduced stagger angle at the endwall. Due to the contouring process generating a fillet, the contoured airfoil is referred to as L2F-EF (“endwall fillet”). Predictions in this paper suggest endwall loss reductions between 17% and 24% at Re = 100,000. Linear cascade experiments in Part II of this paper indicate that L2F-EF reduces endwall losses more than 20% compared to L2F. The overall conclusion is that the stagger angle has a significant effect on endwall loss and should be considered for designing high lift LPT airfoils at the endwall.

Effect of Blade Profile Contouring on Endwall Flow Structure in a High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Sangston ◽  
Jesse Little ◽  
M. Eric Lyall ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Total Pressure ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Computational Tools ◽  
Design Modification ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine

Previous work has shown that low-stagger contouring near the endwall of a nominally high-lift and high-stagger angle front-loaded low-pressure turbine (LPT) airfoil is successful in reducing endwall loss by limiting the development and migration of low momentum fluid associated with secondary flow structures. The design modification that leads to loss reduction in that study was determined from an intuitive approach based on the premise that reducing flow separation near the endwall will lead to reduced loss production. Those authors also relied heavily upon Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) based computational tools. Due to uncertainties inherent in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions, there is little confidence that the authors actually achieved true minimum loss. Despite recent advances in computing capability, turbulence modeling remains a shortcoming of modern design tools. As a contribution to overcoming this problem, this paper offers a three-dimensional (3D) view of the developing mean flow, total pressure, and turbulence fields that gave rise to the loss reduction of the airfoil mentioned above. Experiments are conducted in a linear cascade with aspect ratio of 3.5 and Re = 100,000. The results are derived from stereoscopic particle image velocimetry (PIV) and total pressure measurements inside the passage. Overall, the loss reduction correlates strongly with reduced turbulence production. The aim of this paper is to provide readers with a realistic view of mean flow and turbulence development that include all the components of the Reynolds stress tensor to assess, at least qualitatively, the validity of high fidelity computational tools used to calculate turbine flows.

Endwall Loss Reduction of High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoils Using Profile Contouring: Part I — Airfoil Design

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Eric Lyall ◽  
Paul I. King ◽  
John P. Clark ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Design Process ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Linear Cascade ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Turbine Airfoils ◽  
Stagger Angle

This paper presents the reasoning for and the design process of contouring a high lift front-loaded low pressure turbine (LPT) airfoil near the endwall to reduce the endwall loss. The test airfoil, L2F, was designed to the approximate gas angles with 38% larger pitchwise spacing than the widely studied Pack B airfoil. Being more front-loaded with a higher stagger angle, L2F is shown to produce more endwall losses than Pack B. It is suggested that the high endwall loss of L2F is due to the high stagger angle, not front-loading as usually suggested in the literature. A procedure is presented to approximate the front-loading and stall resistance of L2F and obtain a low stagger version of that airfoil, designated L2F-LS. A contoured airfoil is then designed by transitioning L2F into L2F-LS at the endwall to obtain a benefit from the reduced stagger angle at the endwall. The contouring process generates a fillet, so the contoured airfoil is referred to as L2F-EF (“Endwall Fillet”). Predictions in this paper suggest endwall loss reductions between 17% and 24% at Re = 100,000. Linear cascade experiments in Part II [1] of this paper indicate that L2F-EF reduces endwall losses more than 20% compared to L2F. The overall conclusion is that the stagger angle has a significant effect on endwall loss and should be considered for designing high lift LPT airfoils at the endwall.

Comparison of Endwall Loss Reduction Techniques in a High-Lift Turbine Passage

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Marks ◽  
Nathan Fletcher ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Linear Cascade ◽  
Reduction Mechanisms ◽  
Research Profile ◽  
Secondary Flow Field

Abstract The development of techniques that reduce the losses in the endwall region is an important area of research as it supports an increase in the turbine design space through the use of higher lift blade designs while maintaining high efficiency. Several active and passive shape contouring methods that reduce losses generated by the secondary flow have been developed and investigated on a high-lift front-loaded LP turbine research profile in a low-speed linear cascade configuration. This paper summarizes and compares alterations to the three-dimensional secondary flow field by the application of three different techniques: blade profile contouring, optimized endwall shape contouring, and localized low mass coefficient jets. Each method was applied to identical research blade profiles and compared in the same linear cascade wind tunnel resulting in a unique perspective into the loss reduction mechanisms associated with each technique. The design strategy will be discussed along with a detailed description of changes to the secondary flow field using in- and out-of-passage total pressure loss measurements and high-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. The key findings include the loss reduction mechanisms associated with each approach and the manipulation of key endwall flow structures such as the passage vortex and a strong suction surface corner separation.

COMPARISON OF ENDWALL LOSS REDUCTION TECHNIQUES IN A HIGH-LIFT TURBINE PASSAGE

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Christopher Marks ◽  
Nathan Fletcher ◽  
Rolf Sondergaard
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Secondary Flow ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Linear Cascade ◽  
Reduction Mechanisms ◽  
Research Profile ◽  
Secondary Flow Field

Abstract The development of techniques that reduce the losses in the endwall region is an important area of research as it supports an increase in the turbine design space through the use of higher lift blade designs while maintaining high efficiency. Several active and passive shape contouring methods that reduce losses generated by the secondary flow have been developed and investigated on a high-lift front-loaded LP turbine research profile in a low-speed linear cascade configuration. This paper summarizes and compares alterations to the three-dimensional secondary flow field by the application of three different techniques: blade profile contouring, optimized endwall shape contouring, and localized low mass coefficient jets. Each method was applied to identical research blade profiles and compared in the same linear cascade wind tunnel resulting in a unique perspective into the loss reduction mechanisms associated with each technique. The design strategy will be discussed along with a detailed description of changes to the secondary flow field using in- and out-of-passage total pressure loss measurements and high-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. The key findings include the loss reduction mechanisms associated with each approach and the manipulation of key endwall flow structures such as the passage vortex and a strong suction surface corner separation.

Secondary Flow Response to Endwall Jets in a Low Pressure Turbine

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Fletcher ◽  
Christopher R. Marks ◽  
Molly H. Donovan
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Flow ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Active Flow Control ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Passage Vortex ◽  
Flow Features ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Due to the significant losses contributed by the secondary flow features, an active flow control system was implemented in a low-pressure turbine linear cascade which consisted of localized endwall jets with small mass ratios to perturb the dominant passage vortex. Benefits included significant area-averaged total pressure loss reduction and improved exit angle deviations which help to open the design envelope to application of high-lift front-loaded blades. This report looks to reveal the impact of steady and pulsed endwall blowing on the secondary flow dynamics. High-speed stereoscopic particle image velocimetry for an in-passage measurement plane was utilized to investigate the time-dependent behavior of key flow features such as the passage vortex. At baseline conditions, the passage vortex is characterized by time-varying oscillatory motion in the pitchwise direction, streamwise undulation, bursting, and fluctuating strength. Upon actuation of endwall jets, some of these defining dynamics of key flow features were greatly affected. A complementary investigation of the endwall jets mounted outside of a turbine environment in order to study the emitted structures at varying conditions was used to explain the observations found in the turbine passage. Insights into the secondary flow responsiveness demonstrated that loss reduction was realized by inducing reduced coherence of the passage vortex. Despite pulsed blowing at discrete frequencies associated with the passage vortex, there was no indication that instability excitation was exploited. Rather, the endwall jets acted as a periodic shape-change to the endwall which weakened the passage vortex and forced it closer to the suction-surface.

Profiled End-Wall Design Using an Adjoint Navier-Stokes Solver

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roque Corral ◽  
Fernando Gisbert
Keyword(s):  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Cost Function ◽  
Unstructured Mesh ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Gradient Based ◽  
Parallel Multigrid ◽  
End Wall ◽  
Discrete Formulation

A methodology to minimize blade secondary losses by modifying turbine end-walls is presented. The optimization is addressed using a gradient-based method, where the computation of the gradient is performed using an adjoint code and the secondary kinetic energy is used as a cost function. The adjoint code is implemented on the basis of the discrete formulation of a parallel multigrid unstructured mesh Navier-Stokes solver. The results of the optimization of two end-walls of a low pressure turbine row are shown.

Redesign of High-Lift LP-Turbine Airfoils for Low Speed Testing

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Marconcini ◽  
Filippo Rubechini ◽  
Roberto Pacciani ◽  
Andrea Arnone ◽  
Francesco Bertini
Keyword(s):  
Separated Flow ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
High Lift ◽  
Low Speed ◽  
Low Pressure Turbine ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Flow Configurations ◽  
Artificial Neural Network Ann ◽  
Lp Turbine ◽  
Turbine Airfoils

Low pressure turbine airfoils of the present generation usually operate at subsonic conditions, with exit Mach numbers of about 0.6. To reduce the costs of experimental programs it can be convenient to carry out measurements in low speed tunnels in order to determine the cascades performance. Generally speaking, low speed tests are usually carried out on airfoils with modified shape, in order to compensate for the effects of compressibility. A scaling procedure for high-lift, low pressure turbine airfoils to be studied in low speed conditions is presented and discussed. The proposed procedure is based on the matching of a prescribed blade load distribution between the low speed airfoil and the actual one. Such a requirement is fulfilled via an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methodology and a detailed parameterization of the airfoil. A RANS solver is used to guide the redesign process. The comparison between high and low speed profiles is carried out, over a wide range of Reynolds numbers, by using a novel three-equation, transition-sensitive, turbulence model. Such a model is based on the coupling of an additional transport equation for the so-called laminar kinetic energy (LKE) with the Wilcox k–ω model and it has proven to be effective for transitional, separated-flow configurations of high-lift cascade flows.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document