Response Probability Analysis of Random Acoustic Field Based on Perturbation Stochastic Method and Change-of-Variable Technique

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Baizhan Xia ◽  
Dejie Yu

To calculate the probability density function of the response of a random acoustic field, a change-of-variable perturbation stochastic finite element method (CVPSFEM), which integrates the perturbation stochastic finite element method (PSFEM) and the change-of-variable technique in a unified form, is proposed. In the proposed method, the response of a random acoustic field is approximated as a linear function of the random variables based on a first order stochastic perturbation analysis. According to the linear relationship between the response and the random variables, the formal expression of the probability density function of the response of a random acoustic field is obtained by the change-of-variable technique. The numerical examples on a two-dimensional (2D) acoustic tube and a three-dimensional (3D) acoustic cavity of an automobile cabin verify the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method. Hence, the proposed method can be considered as an effective method to quantify the effects of the parametric randomness of a random acoustic field on the sound pressure response.

2013 ◽  
Vol 702 ◽  
pp. 304-309
Author(s):  
Seifedine Kadry

The Stochastic Finite Element Method (SFEM) represents a new approach to solve mechanical systems with stochastic characteristics. The SFEM is based on the deterministic Finite Element Method in which some variables related to the structural state (variables involved in the stiffness matrix) and to the applied actions (involved in the load vector) are uncertain. In other words, the SFEM tries to look for the stochastic properties of the mechanical response. The solution of a stochastic mechanical system is completely defined through the evaluation of the probability density function of the response process. This cannot be analytically achieved through most of the available methods and techniques such as Fokker-Planck equation, Wiener-Hermite expansion, perturbation methods, stochastic linearization, WHEP technique, decomposition method and stochastic finite element methods [1; 2]. Some exact solutions are available for the mean and standard deviation, not for the Probability Density Function (pdf), of the solution process. In this paper, we develop the theory of method named the Stochastic Transformation Method (STM) in order to determine the pdf of the response of a stochastic mechanical system with random excitation and/or stiffness. The Stochastic Transformation Method is based on one-to-one mapping between the random output(s) and input(s) where the transformation Jacobean J can be computed. The pdf of the output(s) is then computed through the known joint pdf of the inputs multiplied by the determinant of transformation Jacobean matrix. The one-to-one mapping condition can be relaxed through some mathematical tricks. This STM allows us to express the “exact” pdf of the mechanical response [3], provided that the transformation Jacobean can be defined. For many cases, the pdf of the response can be obtained in a closed-form in terms of the joint distribution of the input random variables.


Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-43
Author(s):  
Dario Grana

Rock physics models are physical equations that map petrophysical properties into geophysical variables, such as elastic properties and density. These equations are generally used in quantitative log and seismic interpretation to estimate the properties of interest from measured well logs and seismic data. Such models are generally calibrated using core samples and well log data and result in accurate predictions of the unknown properties. Because the input data are often affected by measurement errors, the model predictions are often uncertain. Instead of applying rock physics models to deterministic measurements, I propose to apply the models to the probability density function of the measurements. This approach has been previously adopted in literature using Gaussian distributions, but for petrophysical properties of porous rocks, such as volumetric fractions of solid and fluid components, the standard probabilistic formulation based on Gaussian assumptions is not applicable due to the bounded nature of the properties, the multimodality, and the non-symmetric behavior. The proposed approach is based on the Kumaraswamy probability density function for continuous random variables, which allows modeling double bounded non-symmetric distributions and is analytically tractable, unlike the Beta or Dirichtlet distributions. I present a probabilistic rock physics model applied to double bounded continuous random variables distributed according to a Kumaraswamy distribution and derive the analytical solution of the posterior distribution of the rock physics model predictions. The method is illustrated for three rock physics models: Raymer’s equation, Dvorkin’s stiff sand model, and Kuster-Toksoz inclusion model.


Author(s):  
Robert J Marks II

In this Chapter, we present application of Fourier analysis to probability, random variables and stochastic processes [1089, 1097, 1387, 1329]. Arandom variable, X, is the assignment of a number to the outcome of a random experiment. We can, for example, flip a coin and assign an outcome of a heads as X = 1 and a tails X = 0. Often the number is equated to the numerical outcome of the experiment, such as the number of dots on the face of a rolled die or the measurement of a voltage in a noisy circuit. The cumulative distribution function is defined by FX(x) = Pr[X ≤ x]. (4.1) The probability density function is the derivative fX(x) = d /dxFX(x). Our treatment of random variables focuses on use of Fourier analysis. Due to this viewpoint, the development we use is unconventional and begins immediately in the next section with discussion of properties of the probability density function.


Author(s):  
Xin Gao ◽  
Hong Xu ◽  
Dong Ye

We consider the asymptotic behavior of a probability density function for the sum of any two lognormally distributed random variables that are nontrivially correlated. We show that both the left and right tails can be approximated by some simple functions. Furthermore, the same techniques are applied to determine the tail probability density function for a ratio statistic, and for a sum with more than two lognormally distributed random variables under some stricter conditions. The results yield new insights into the problem of characterization for a sum of lognormally distributed random variables and demonstrate that there is a need to revisit many existing approximation methods.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jagdev Singh ◽  
Devendra Kumar

Abstract In this paper, we obtain the distribution of mixed sum of two independent random variables with different probability density functions. One with probability density function defined in finite range and the other with probability density function defined in infinite range and associated with product of Srivastava's polynomials and H-function. We use the Laplace transform and its inverse to obtain our main result. The result obtained here is quite general in nature and is capable of yielding a large number of corresponding new and known results merely by specializing the parameters involved therein. To illustrate, some special cases of our main result are also given.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seifedine Kadry

We study the periodicity of the solutions of the rational difference equations system of type , (), and then we propose new exact procedure to find the probability density function of the solution, where a, b, and are independent random variables.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-121
Author(s):  
Yogendra P. Chaubey ◽  
Nhat Linh Vu

In this paper, we are interested in estimating the entropy of a non-negative random variable. Since the underlying probability density function is unknown, we propose the use of the Poisson smoothed histogram density estimator to estimate the entropy. To study the per- formance of our estimator, we run simulations on a wide range of densities and compare our entropy estimators with the existing estimators based on different approaches such as spacing estimators. Furthermore, we extend our study to residual entropy estimators which is the entropy of a random variable given that it has been survived up to time $t$.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document