Heat Transfer to a Boiling Liquid—Mechanism and Correlations

1959 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Engelberg-Forster ◽  
R. Greif
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Vapor Bubble ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Exchange Mechanism ◽  
Superheated Liquid ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
System Pressure ◽  
Transfer Mechanisms ◽  
Vapor Liquid

Various heat-transfer mechanisms which have been previously proposed are analyzed in the light of recent experiments. Evidence is presented in favor of a vapor-liquid exchange mechanism. The vapor-liquid exchange mechanism is shown to explain the insensitivity of boiling heat flux to the level of subcooling. A “Reynolds’ analogy” for nucleate boiling is presented in some detail. A procedure is given for calculating the superheat at which the liquid bulk velocity ceases to contribute to the heat flux. An expression for the growth of a vapor bubble in a highly superheated liquid is deduced. A method is presented which allows the deduction of correlations for nucleate boiling which give the dependence of heat flux on superheat and system pressure. Two such correlations are presented and results are compared with experiment. It is shown that one correlation yields the heat flux for different liquids varying from water to mercury, without necessitating any change in constant or exponent of the correlation.

Study on Subcooled-Forced Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Critical Heat Flux of Solid-Water Two-Phase Mixture

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuo Koizumi ◽  
Hiroyasu Ohtake ◽  
Manabu Mochizuki
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Liquid Layer ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Flow Boiling ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Forced Flow ◽  
Superheated Liquid ◽  
Flow Boiling Heat Transfer

Abstract The effect of solid particle introduction on subcooled-forced flow boiling heat transfer and a critical heat flux was examined experimentally. In the experiment, glass beads of 0.6 mm diameter were mixed in subcooled water. Experiments were conducted in a range of the subcooling of 40 K, a velocity of 0.17–6.7 m/s, a volumetric particle ratio of 0–17%. When particles were introduced, the growth of a superheated liquid layer near a heat trasnsfer surface seemed to be suppressed and the onset of nucleate boiling was delayed. The particles promoted the condensation of bubbles on the heat transfer surface, which shifted the initiation of a net vapor generation to a high heat flux region. Boiling heat trasnfer was augmented by the particle introduction. The suppression of the growth of the superheated liquid layer and the promotion of bubble condensation and dissipation by the particles seemed to contribute that heat transfer augmentation. The wall superheat at the critical heat flux was elevated by the particle introduction and the critical heat flux itself was also enhanced. However, the degree of the critical heat flux improvement was not drastic.

Microscale Vapor Bubble Interactions During Subcooled Nucleate Boiling on a Heated Wire

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Zhang ◽  
David M. Christopher
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Vapor Bubble ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Bubble Behavior ◽  
Transfer Rates ◽  
Bubble Interactions ◽  
Heated Wire ◽  
Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Transfer Mechanisms

Bubbles have been observed moving along heated wires during subcooled nucleate boiling as they are driven by Marangoni convection around the bubbles. This paper presents more detailed observations of the vapor bubble interactions and moving bubble behavior during subcooled nucleate boiling on a heated microwire. The experimental results show that moving bubbles coalesce or rebound from other bubbles and that bubbles hop on the wire. These observations show how bubble interactions significantly affect nucleate boiling heat transfer rates and how Marangoni flow plays an important role in microscale nucleate boiling heat transfer mechanisms.

Performance of Plate Heat Exchangers Used as Refrigerant Liquid-Overfeed Evaporators

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianchang Huang ◽  
Thomas J. Sheer ◽  
Michael Bailey-McEwan
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Strong Dependence ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Small Range ◽  
Plate Heat ◽  
System Pressure

The heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of plate heat exchangers were measured, when used as refrigerant liquid over-feed evaporators. The three units all had 24 plates but with different chevron-angle combinations of 28°/28°, 28°/60°, and 60°/60°. R134a flowing upwards was used as the refrigerant, in a counter-current arrangement with water flowing on the other side. Heat transfer and pressure drop measurements were made over a range of mass flux, heat flux and corresponding outlet vapour fractions. The effect of system pressure on the evaporator performance was not evaluated due to the small range of evaporating temperature. Experimental data were reduced to obtain the refrigerant-side heat transfer coefficient and frictional pressure drop. The results for heat transfer showed a strong dependence on heat flux and weak dependence on mass flux and vapour fraction. Furthermore, the chevron angle had a small influence on heat transfer but a large influence on frictional pressure drops. Along with observations that were obtained previously on large ammonia and R12 plate evaporators, it is concluded that the dominating heat transfer mechanism in this type of evaporator is nucleate-boiling rather than forced convection. For the two-phase friction factor, various established methods were evaluated; the homogeneous treatment gives good agreement.

A Statistical Model of Bubble Coalescence and Its Application to Boiling Heat Flux Prediction—Part I: Model Development

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Wu ◽  
Barclay G. Jones ◽  
Ty A. Newell
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Statistical Model ◽  
Vapor Bubble ◽  
Surface Heat Flux ◽  
Bubble Radius ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Surface Heat ◽  
Bubble Coalescence ◽  
Bubble Motion

In this work a statistical model is developed by deriving the probability density function (pdf) of bubble coalescence on boiling surface to describe the distribution of vapor bubble radius. Combining this bubble coalescence model with other existing models in the literature that describe the dynamics of bubble motion and the mechanisms of heat transfer, the surface heat flux in subcooled nucleate boiling can be calculated. By decomposing the surface heat flux into various components due to different heat transfer mechanisms, including forced convection, transient conduction, and evaporation, the effect of the bubble motion is identified and quantified. Predictions of the surface heat flux are validated with R134a data measured in boiling experiments and water data available in the literature, with an overall good agreement observed. Results indicate that there exists a limit of surface heat flux due to the increased bubble coalescence and the reduced vapor bubble lift-off radius as the wall temperature increased. Further investigation confirms the consistency between this limit value and the experimentally measured critical heat flux (CHF), suggesting that a unified mechanistic modeling to predict both the surface heat flux and CHF is possible. In view of the success of this statistical modeling, the authors tend to propose the utilization of probabilistic formulation and stochastic analysis in future modeling attempts on subcooled nucleate boiling.

Influence of System Pressure on Microlayer Evaporation Heat Transfer

1978 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Fath ◽  
R. L. Judd
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Methylene Chloride ◽  
Laser Interferometry ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
High Speed Photography ◽  
System Pressure ◽  
Evaporation Heat ◽  
Microlayer Evaporation

Evaporation of the microlayer underlying a bubble during nucleate boiling heat transfer is experimentally investigated by boiling dichloromethane (methylene chloride) on an oxide coated glass surface using laser interferometry and high speed photography. The influence of system pressure (51.5 kN/m2—101.3 kN/m2) and heat flux (17 k W/m2—65 kW/m2) upon the active site density, frequency of bubble emission, bubble departure radius and the volume of the microlayer evaporated have been studied. The results of the present investigation indicate that the microlayer evaporation phenomenon is a significant heat transfer mechanism, especially at low pressure, since up to 40 percent of the total heat transport is accounted for by microlayer evaporation. This contribution to the overall heat transfer decreases with increasing system pressure and decreasing heat flux. The results obtained were used to support the model propounded by Hwang and Judd for predicting boiling heat flux incorporating microlayer evaporation, natural convection and transient thermal conduction mechanisms.

Heat Transfer Characteristics of Isolated Bubble Nucleate Boiling of Water

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohide Yabuki ◽  
Osamu Nakabeppu
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Temperature Variation ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Superheated Liquid ◽  
High Heat Flux ◽  
Surface Boundary ◽  
Measured Temperature ◽  
Wall Superheat ◽  
Dry Out

The mechanism of isolated bubble pool nucleate boiling of water is studied by a novel approach method using the developed MEMS thermal sensor. The local temperature variation beneath isolated bubble was measured using the MEMS sensor at different six wall superheats. Evaporation and dry-out of the microlayer and the rewetting of the dry-out area were obviously observed in the measured temperature variation. Wall heat transfer was numerically calculated by transient heat conduction simulation with the measured temperature as a surface boundary condition. The results showed that the microlayer evaporation transfers high heat flux of a few MW/m2, and dominantly contributes to the heat transport from the heating wall during the bubble growth phase. The ratio of the heat transferred from the wall to the latent heat in the bubble at the departure decreased with increasing wall superheat. In other words, the contribution of the heat transfer from the superheated liquid layer surrounding the bubble becomes important with increasing wall superheat. Moreover, the microlayer thickness was calculated by integrating the local heat flux. The derived initial thickness of the microlayer was independent from the wall superheat and became thick as distance from the nucleation site increases.

THE MECHANISM OF RAISING AND QUANTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC HEAT FLUX AT BOILING OF NANOFLUIDS IN FREE CONVECTION CONDITIONS

2017 ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
V.N. Moraru
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heat Capacity ◽  
Specific Heat ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Heating Surface ◽  
Physical Models ◽  
Superheated Liquid ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Boiling Process

The results of our work and a number of foreign studies indicate that the sharp increase in the heat transfer parameters (specific heat flux q and heat transfer coefficient _) at the boiling of nanofluids as compared to the base liquid (water) is due not only and not so much to the increase of the thermal conductivity of the nanofluids, but an intensification of the boiling process caused by a change in the state of the heating surface, its topological and chemical properties (porosity, roughness, wettability). The latter leads to a change in the internal characteristics of the boiling process and the average temperature of the superheated liquid layer. This circumstance makes it possible, on the basis of physical models of the liquids boiling and taking into account the parameters of the surface state (temperature, pressure) and properties of the coolant (the density and heat capacity of the liquid, the specific heat of vaporization and the heat capacity of the vapor), and also the internal characteristics of the boiling of liquids, to calculate the value of specific heat flux q. In this paper, the difference in the mechanisms of heat transfer during the boiling of single-phase (water) and two-phase nanofluids has been studied and a quantitative estimate of the q values for the boiling of the nanofluid is carried out based on the internal characteristics of the boiling process. The satisfactory agreement of the calculated values with the experimental data is a confirmation that the key factor in the growth of the heat transfer intensity at the boiling of nanofluids is indeed a change in the nature and microrelief of the heating surface. Bibl. 20, Fig. 9, Tab. 2.

Near-Wall Microlayer Evaporation Analysis and Experimental Study of Nucleate Pool Boiling on Inclined Surfaces

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 641-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. Naterer ◽  
W. Hendradjit ◽  
K. J. Ahn ◽  
J. E. S. Venart
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Heating Surface ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Inclined Surfaces ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Model Predictions ◽  
Microlayer Evaporation ◽  
Near Wall

Boiling heat transfer from inclined surfaces is examined and an analytical model of bubble growth and nucleate boiling is presented. The model predicts the average heat flux during nucleate boiling by considering alternating near-wall liquid and vapor periods. It expresses the heat flux in terms of the bubble departure diameter, frequency and duration of contact with the heating surface. Experiments were conducted over a wide range of upward and downward-facing surface orientations and the results were compared to model predictions. More active microlayer agitation and mixing along the surface as well as more frequent bubble sweeps along the heating surface provide the key reasons for more effective heat transfer with downward facing surfaces as compared to upward facing cases. Additional aspects of the role of surface inclination on boiling dynamics are quantified and discussed.

Boiling Heat Transfer and Critical Heat Flux Enhancement of Upward- and Downward-Facing Heater in Nanofluids

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Zuhairi Sulaiman ◽  
Masahiro Takamura ◽  
Kazuki Nakahashi ◽  
Tomio Okawa
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Flux Enhancement ◽  
Optimum Configuration ◽  
Wall Superheat ◽  
Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer

Boiling heat transfer (BHT) and critical heat flux (CHF) performance were experimentally studied for saturated pool boiling of water-based nanofluids. In present experimental works, copper heaters of 20 mm diameter with titanium-oxide (TiO2) nanocoated surface were produced in pool boiling of nanofluid. Experiments were performed in both upward and downward facing nanofluid coated heater surface. TiO2 nanoparticle was used with concentration ranging from 0.004 until 0.4 kg/m3 and boiling time of tb = 1, 3, 10, 20, 40, and 60 mins. Distilled water was used to observed BHT and CHF performance of different nanofluids boiling time and concentration configurations. Nucleate boiling heat transfer observed to deteriorate in upward facing heater, however; in contrast effect of enhancement for downward. Maximum enhancements of CHF for upward- and downward-facing heater are 2.1 and 1.9 times, respectively. Reduction of mean contact angle demonstrate enhancement on the critical heat flux for both upward-facing and downward-facing heater configuration. However, nucleate boiling heat transfer shows inconsistency in similar concentration with sequence of boiling time. For both downward- and upward-facing nanocoated heater's BHT and CHF, the optimum configuration denotes by C = 400 kg/m3 with tb = 1 min which shows the best increment of boiling curve trend with lowest wall superheat ΔT = 25 K and critical heat flux enhancement of 2.02 times.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document