Unsteady Pressure Analysis of a Swirling Flow With Vortex Rope and Axial Water Injection in a Discharge Cone

2012 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alin Ilie Bosioc ◽  
Romeo Susan-Resiga ◽  
Sebastian Muntean ◽  
Constantin Tanasa
Keyword(s):  
Draft Tube ◽  
Partial Discharge ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Water Jet ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Conical Diffuser ◽  
Jet Control

The variable demand of the energy market requires that hydraulic turbines operate at variable conditions, which includes regimes far from the best efficiency point. The vortex rope developed at partial discharges in the conical diffuser is responsible for large pressure pulsations, runner blades breakdowns and may lead to power swing phenomena. A novel method introduced by Resiga et al. (2006, “Jet Control of the Draft Tube in Francis Turbines at Partial Discharge,” Proceedings of the 23rd IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Paper No. F192) injects an axial water jet from the runner crown downstream in the draft tube cone to mitigate the vortex rope and its consequences. A special test rig was developed at “Politehnica” University of Timisoara in order to investigate different flow control techniques. Consequently, a vortex rope similar to the one developed in a Francis turbine cone at 70% partial discharge is generated in the rig’s test section. In order to investigate the new jet control method an auxiliary hydraulic circuit was designed in order to supply the jet. The experimental investigations presented in this paper are concerned with pressure measurements at the wall of the conical diffuser. The pressure fluctuations’ Fourier spectra are analyzed in order to assess how the amplitude and dominating frequency are modified by the water injection. It is shown that the water jet injection significantly reduces both the amplitude and the frequency of pressure fluctuations, while improving the pressure recovery in the conical diffuser.

scholarly journals Effect of Air Injection on the Internal Flow Characteristics in the Draft Tube of a Francis Turbine Model

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1182
Author(s):  
Seung-Jun Kim ◽  
Yong Cho ◽  
Jin-Hyuk Kim
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Flow Characteristics ◽  
Internal Flow ◽  
Air Injection ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Vortex Rope

Under low flow-rate conditions, a Francis turbine exhibits precession of a vortex rope with pressure fluctuations in the draft tube. These undesirable flow phenomena can lead to deterioration of the turbine performance as manifested by torque and power output fluctuations. In order to suppress the rope with precession and a swirl component in the tube, the use of anti-swirl fins was investigated in a previous study. However, vortex rope generation still occurred near the cone of the tube. In this study, unsteady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes analyses were conducted with a scale-adaptive simulation shear stress transport turbulence model. This model was used to observe the effects of the injection in the draft tube on the unsteady internal flow and pressure phenomena considering both active and passive suppression methods. The air injection affected the generation and suppression of the vortex rope and swirl component depending on the flow rate of the air. In addition, an injection level of 0.5%Q led to a reduction in the maximum unsteady pressure characteristics.

scholarly journals Manipulation of the swirling flow instability in hydraulic turbine diffuser by different methods of water injection

2018 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 02090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Rudolf ◽  
Jiří Litera ◽  
Germán Alejandro Ibarra Bolanos ◽  
David Štefan
Keyword(s):  
Swirling Flow ◽  
Flow Instability ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Hydraulic Turbine ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Wide Range

Vortex rope, which induces substantial pressure pulsations, arises in the draft tube (diffuser) of Francis turbine for off-design operating conditions. Present paper focuses on mitigation of those pulsations using active water jet injection control. Several modifications of the original Susan-Resiga’s idea were proposed. All modifications are driven by manipulation of the shear layer region, which is believed to play important role in swirling flow instability. While some of the methods provide results close to the original one, none of them works in such a wide range. Series of numerical experiments support the idea that the necessary condition for vortex rope pulsation mitigation is increasing the fluid momentum along the draft tube axis.

Generation of Twin Vortex Rope in the Draft-Tube Elbow of a Francis Turbine During Deep Part-Load Operation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hossein Khozaei ◽  
Arthur Favrel ◽  
Toshitake Masuko ◽  
Naoki Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazuyoshi Miyagawa
Keyword(s):  
Linear Correlation ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Model Tests ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Deep Part ◽  
Swirl Number ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Part Load

Abstract This paper focuses on the generation of twin vortex rope in the draft-tube elbow of a Francis turbine at deep part-load operation through analyzing the results of model tests along with numerical simulations. Model tests, including pressure fluctuations measurements, are conducted over 10 speed factors. By considering the frequency of the pressure fluctuations with respect to the swirl intensity at the runner outlet, the part-load operating range is divided into three regimes, with two clear transitions between each occurring at swirl numbers 0.4 and 1.7. For operating conditions with a swirl number S>0.4, a linear correlation between the frequency of the precessing vortex core and the swirl number is established. During deep part-load regime (S>1.7), low-frequency pressure fluctuations appear. Their frequency feature another linear correlation with the swirl number. Unsteady CFD simulation of the full domain is performed to elucidate the generation mechanisms of the low-frequency fluctuations. By tracking the center of the vortical structures along the draft-tube, generation of three vortices in the elbow responsible for the pressure fluctuations at the lowest frequency is highlighted: the main PVC hits the draft-tube wall in the elbow resulting in its break down into three vortices rotating with half the rotational speed of the PVC. Two of the vortices rotate with opposite angular position, constituting a structure of twin vortices. The periodic rotation of these three vortices in the elbow induces the low-frequency pressure fluctuations.

Flow in the Simplified Draft Tube of a Francis Turbine Operating at Partial Load—Part II: Control of the Vortex Rope

2014 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosein Foroutan ◽  
Savas Yavuzkurt
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Control Technique ◽  
Outer Flow ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Stagnant Region ◽  
Partial Load

Numerical simulations and investigation of a method for controlling the vortex rope formation in draft tubes are carried out in this paper, which is the second part of a two-paper series. As shown in the companion paper, formation of the vortex rope is associated with a large stagnant region at the center of the draft tube. Therefore, it is concluded that a successful control technique should focus on the elimination of this region. In practice, this can be performed by axially injecting a small fraction (a few percent of the total flow rate) of water into the draft tube. Water jet is supplied from the high-pressure flow upstream of the turbine spiral case by a bypass line; thus, no extra pump is needed in this method. It is shown that this method is very effective in elimination of the stagnant region in a simplified draft tube operating at two part-load conditions, i.e., at 91% and 70% of the best efficiency point (BEP) flow rate. This results in improvement of the draft tube performance and reduction of hydraulic losses. The loss coefficient is reduced by as much as 50% for the case with 91% of BEP flow rate and 14% for the case with 70% of BEP flow rate. Unsteady, three-dimensional simulations show that the jet increases the axial momentum of flow at the center of the draft tube and decreases the wake of the crown cone and thereby decreases the shear at the interface of the stagnant region and high velocity outer flow, which ultimately results in elimination of the vortex rope. Furthermore, reduction (by about 1/3 in the case with 70% of BEP flow rate) of strong pressure fluctuations leads to reliable operation of the turbine.

Experimental Evidence of Hydroacoustic Pressure Waves in a Francis Turbine Elbow Draft Tube for Low Discharge Conditions

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Arpe ◽  
Christophe Nicolet ◽  
François Avellan
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Fluctuation ◽  
Swirling Flow ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Hydropower Plant ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Vortex Rope

The complex three-dimensional unsteady flow developing in the draft tube of a Francis turbine is responsible for pressure fluctuations, which could prevent the whole hydropower plant from operating safely. Indeed, the Francis draft tube is subjected to inlet swirling flow, divergent cross section, and the change of flow direction. As a result, in low discharge off-design operating conditions, a cavitation helical vortex, so-called the vortex rope develops in the draft tube and induces pressure fluctuations in the range of 0.2–0.4 times the runner frequency. This paper presents the extensive unsteady wall pressure measurements performed in the elbow draft tube of a high specific speed Francis turbine scale model at low discharge and at usual plant value of the Thoma cavitation number. The investigation is undertaken for operating conditions corresponding to low discharge, i.e., 0.65–0.85 times the design discharge, which exhibits pressure fluctuations at surprisingly high frequency value, between 2 and 4 times the runner rotation frequency. The pressure fluctuation measurements performed with 104 pressure transducers distributed on the draft tube wall, make apparent in the whole draft tube a fundamental frequency value at 2.5 times the runner frequency. Moreover, the modulations between this frequency with the vortex rope precession frequency are pointed out. The phase shift analysis performed for 2.5 times the runner frequency enables the identification of a pressure wave propagation phenomenon and indicates the location of the corresponding pressure fluctuation excitation source in the elbow; hydroacoustic waves propagate from this source both upstream and downstream the draft tube.

Unsteady vortical flow simulation in a Francis turbine with special emphasis on vortex rope behavior and pressure fluctuation alleviation

2017 ◽  
Vol 231 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianwu Luo ◽  
An Yu ◽  
Bin Ji ◽  
Yulin Wu ◽  
Yoshinobu Tsujimoto
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Fluctuation ◽  
Swirling Flow ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Flow Simulation ◽  
Vortical Flow ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Spiral Vortex ◽  
Baroclinic Torque

Hydro turbines operating at partial flow conditions usually have vortex ropes in the draft tube that generate large pressure fluctuations. This unsteady flow phenomenon is harmful to the safe operation of hydropower stations. This paper presents numerical simulations of the internal flow in the draft tube of a Francis turbine with particular emphasis on understanding the unsteady characteristics of the vortex rope structure and the underlying mechanisms for the interactions between the air and the vortices. The pressure fluctuations induced by the vortex rope are alleviated by air admission from the main shaft center, with the water-air two phase flow in the entire flow passage of a model turbine simulated based on the homogeneous flow assumption. The results show that aeration with suitable air flow rate can alleviate the pressure fluctuations in the draft tube, and the mechanism improving the flow stability in the draft tube is due to the change of vortex rope structure and distribution by aeration, i.e. a helical vortex rope at a small aeration volume while a cylindrical vortex rope with a large amount of aeration. The preferable vortex rope distribution can suppress the swirl at the smaller flow rates, and is helpful to alleviate the pressure fluctuation in the draft tube. The analysis based on the vorticity transport equation indicates that the vortex has strong stretching and dilation in the vortex rope evolution. The baroclinic torque term does not play a major role in the vortex evolution most of the time, but will much increase for some specific aeration volumes. The present study also depicts that vortex rope is mainly associated with a pair of spiral vortex stretching and dilation sources, and its swirling flow is alleviated little by the baroclinic torque term, whose effect region is only near the draft tube inlet.

Mitigation of Flow-Induced Pressure Fluctuations in a Francis Turbine Using Water Injection

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhannad Altimemy ◽  
Bashar Attiya ◽  
Cosan Daskiran ◽  
I-Han Liu ◽  
Alparslan Oztekin
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Partial Load ◽  
Flow Induced Vibrations ◽  
Dynamics Simulations

Abstract Computational fluid dynamics simulations are conducted to characterize the spatial and temporal characteristics of the turbulent flow fields inside Francis turbine operating at the design and partial load regimes. High-fidelity large eddy simulations turbulence model is applied to investigate the flow-induced vibrations in the draft tube of the unit. The water injection at 4% rate from the runner cone is implemented to control the flow-induced pressure fluctuations. The simulations are conducted at the turbine design point and two partial load operations with and without water injection. It has been demonstrated that the water injection has a profound influence in the turbulent flow structure and the pressure field inside the draft tube at the partial load operating conditions. To evaluate the effectiveness of the water injection techniques in mitigating flow-induced fluctuations, the probes at various locations along the wall of the draft tube are used to monitor the pressure signals. It appears to be a reduction in the level of pressure fluctuations by the water injection at both partial load operating regimes. However, we could not draw a firm conclusion about the level of mitigation of flow-induced vibrations. Simulations should be carried out for much longer flow time. Water injection hardly influenced the unit power generation. Hence water injection can be employed effectively without a major liability on the power generation.

Pressure Fluctuation Mitigation in a Francis Turbine With Water Injection: Computational Study

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhannad Altimemy ◽  
Cosan Daskiran ◽  
Bashar Attiya ◽  
I-Han Liu ◽  
Alparslan Oztekin
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Fluctuation ◽  
Draft Tube ◽  
Computational Study ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Francis Turbine ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Tube Surface ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Central Vortex ◽  
Dynamics Simulations

Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed on Francis turbine using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) with k-ω SST turbulence model. Simulations were conducted at the turbine’s best efficiency point with a Reynolds number of 2.01 × 107. Water injection was admitted from the runner cone in the stream-wise direction. The aim of this process was to investigate the influence of water injection on the turbine performance and the pressure pulsation. The water injection did not affect the nominal value of the turbine’s power generation. Straight vortex rope was observed at the centerline of the draft tube. Moreover, helix-shaped vortex ropes were obtained near the draft tube surface. The water injection expands the central vortex rope, but it did not suppress or disrupt the helix-shaped peripheral vortex rope near the draft tube surface. The pressure fluctuation became less regular after the water injection, but the fluctuation level remained similar.

Flow-Feedback Method for Mitigating the Vortex Rope in Decelerated Swirling Flows

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantin Tănasă ◽  
Romeo Susan-Resiga ◽  
Sebastian Muntean ◽  
Alin Ilie Bosioc
Keyword(s):  
Swirling Flow ◽  
Flow Instability ◽  
Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Operating Regime ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Vortex Rope ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Wall Pressure Fluctuations ◽  
Hydraulic Turbines

When reaction hydraulic turbines are operated far from the design operating regime, particularly at partial discharge, swirling flow instability is developed downstream of the runner, in the discharge cone, with a precessing helical vortex and its associated severe pressure fluctuations. Bosioc et al. (2012, “Unsteady Pressure Analysis of a Swirling Flow With Vortex Rope and Axial Water Injection in a Discharge Cone,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 134(8), p. 081104) showed that this instability can be successfully mitigated by injecting a water jet along the axis. However, the jet discharge is too large to be supplied with high pressure water bypassing the runner, since this discharge is associated with the volumetric loss. In the present paper we demonstrate that the control jet injected at the inlet of the conical diffuser can actually be supplied with water collected from the discharge cone outlet, thus introducing a new concept of flow feedback. In this case, the jet is driven by the pressure difference between the cone wall, where the feedback spiral case is located, and the pressure at the jet nozzle outlet. In order to reach the required threshold value of the jet discharge, we also introduce ejector pumps to partially compensate for the hydraulic losses in the return pipes. Extensive experimental investigations show that the wall pressure fluctuations are successfully mitigated when the jet reaches 12% of the main flow discharge for a typical part load turbine operating regime. About 10% of the jet discharge is supplied by the plain flow feedback, and only 2% boost is insured by the ejector pumps. As a result, this new approach paves the way towards practical applications in real hydraulic turbines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document